Oubiña’s lawyer, within the trial towards ‘Fariña’: “His life has worsened after the broadcast of the series” | Galicia | Spain | EUROtoday

A brand new judicial setback looms over Laureano Oubiña, the previous Galician drug trafficker who spent greater than 20 years in jail. On this event, he’s the plaintiff in a civil process towards the consideration for which he has put the manufacturing firm Bambú, Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación (Antena 3 TV) and Netflix as distributor of the sequence on the bench. flour, which obtained viewers information. He and his late spouse, as fundamental characters, have been additionally fictional protagonists of scenes of sexual content material that exacerbated the previous Galician boss for ethical damages. He claims compensation of 1.5 million euros for this.

At the listening to held this Tuesday in a court docket in Vilagarcía de Arousa (Pontevedra), Oubiña reported by means of his lawyer that his life has not been the identical for the reason that sequence was broadcast. “The life of Mr. Laureano Oubiña has worsened considerably after the broadcast of this series, because he is portrayed as a person capable of taking the life of another, violent, sexist, cocaine trafficker, impotent, vicious, unfaithful, carried away, a bad father “bad husband, brute, foolish, vengeful, abuser of women, ignorant or mafia,” said lawyer Jorge Paladino Hernández.

However, the prosecutor’s office has asked the magistrate to dismiss Oubiña’s claim for illegitimate interference with his right to honor, personal and family privacy, and his own image. In his report of conclusions, the representative of the public ministry considers that the contents of the series are under the protection of the “right to freedom of creation”, so it’s not attainable to demand “a criterion of veracity that would be typical of the freedom of information.”

In line with the three protection attorneys, the prosecutor concludes that “there has been no illegitimate interference nor have the rights been violated” of Laureano Oubiña. They have additionally agreed together with his thesis by alleging that the plaintiff has not confirmed or quantified any sort of harm brought on by the content material of the sequence in rivalry. Thus, the prosecution and the protection imagine that there isn’t any foundation to say the 1.5 million euros that the previous drug trafficker collectively requests from the defendants, which is why the case has been heard for sentencing.

In the midst of nice media expectation and within the face of a trial that started greater than an hour and a half late, Oubiña went to court docket accompanied by his lawyer, though his presence was not vital because the defendant had not requested his interrogation. Even so, the 77-year-old former Galician boss carried a duplicate of his newest e-book underneath his arm, Disassembling Fariña, which can go on sale within the subsequent few days and barely made any statements. “I feel perfectly calm,” she stated. At the top of the listening to, an Oubiña with a displeased and nearly mute expression left the judicial premises ready for what Justice guidelines.

However, the plaintiff did request the testimony of the defendants, though not one of the witnesses appeared, together with Oubiña’s two daughters and the journalist Nacho Carretero, writer of the e-book flour from which the sequence was impressed. The interrogation session was opened by the consultant of Bambú Producciones, Ramón Campos. Regarding the scenes of a sexual nature, the scriptwriter and producer associated in his assertion that it was Oubiña himself who partly impressed these photographs by telling the actor who performed the previous boss that “as they always had the phone tapped, he and his wife left it under the bed in moments of intimacy.”

The attack of the defenses

Campos also alluded in his statement to the aggressive character of the character and alleged that it was the impression that Oubiña himself had conveyed through his statements and interviews. The producer concluded by highlighting the contradictions of the plaintiff, whom he considers “a man whose honor is not endangered by the series.” flour but their own actions.” Campos stated that a year after the series aired, the former boss proposed through an email that he do one about him, so “agreeing with Oubiña is placing the keys to censorship within the palms of those individuals.” the producer stressed.

Netflix representative, Diego Ábalos, explained that the series premiered in August 2018 and reached 2.5 million Spanish homes. He insisted that the content of the series is inspired by real events, but that the contents have been dramatized for fiction. The platform’s lawyer even rescued phrases uttered by Oubiña on his website, such as the one that says that “he does not aspire to clean her image because there is no caustic soda to clean it.”

According to the lawsuit, this amount claimed “is proportionate to the moral damage that has been multiplied given the impact and audience obtained by said broadcast.” Oubiña alleges that the series is broadcast in prime time and that the episode that is the reason for the lawsuit reached 21.5% of share at the national level, and in the autonomous community of Galicia, 42.7%.

The former drug trafficker also infers in the lawsuit that both he and his late wife are “nominally mentioned in the series,” and remembers that, although they were detained for drug trafficking in Operation Nécora, they were finally only convicted of a tax crime in this case, as as stated in Carretero’s essay. The reproduction and distribution of the book that narrates the origins and evolution of organized crime in Galicia was paralyzed as a precautionary measure by a judge, a controversial kidnapping that weeks before becoming effective triggered the sale of copies.

This is the second lawsuit that Oubiña has filed since he was released from prison in 2017, after chaining three convictions for hashish trafficking for which he spent more than 20 years in prison. The drug trafficker brought Carmen Avendaño, leader of the movement of mothers of drug addicts and president of the Érguete Foundation, to the bench, whom he accused of having insinuated in two radio interviews that he had also trafficked heroin and cocaine. The lawsuit against the honor was dismissed considering that Avendaño’s insinuations “were not libelous,” although it was understandable to the judge that her expressions “could have bothered the plaintiff.”

“I am not going to sit still, I am going to report any accusation that is untrue. Nor am I going to allow them to continue calling me a drug trafficker, because that’s why I served my sentences more than enough,” Oubiña defends himself. His past linked to tobacco smuggling and hashish trafficking is recorded in his memoirs. All the truth, published in June 2018, and has now announced that it is preparing another publication that will be titled Disassembling the Fariña. Oubiña tells in his book all the adventures that he lived outside the law and that he sells with numerous merchandising alluding to that stage at fairs and events, where he also promotes his role as a winegrower with the sale of bottles of the Albariño, Rioja and Ribera del Duero varieties. “Before dead than snitch” or “Rumbo cero” are some of his trademarks.

_