On its immigration invoice, the federal government pits Parliament in opposition to the French | EUROtoday

” The French (…) very broadly support our text, (…) expect us to take strong measures to reduce illegal immigration and to better integrate the people we choose to welcome”, chanted Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne on December 12 during questions to the government. Before the National Assembly, the day after a motion to reject its immigration bill, the government strove to pit parliamentarians against the French.

“What we do a majority of deputies (…), it means agreeing so that the French do not have the text they want”also vilified the Minister of the Interior Gérald Darmanin. “The French want this text, they say it in all the polls”further argued the Minister of Justice, Eric Dupond-Moretti, on France Inter, on December 14.

Parliament in opposition to the favored will? “Public support is always an interesting resource to mobilize, agrees Jérôme Fourquet, director of the Opinion department of the IFOP polling institute. But the government did not call on public opinion when it was largely unfavorable to pension reform or the abolition of the ISF [impôt de solidarité sur la fortune]. »

The fact remains that on the broad outlines of its text, Macronie can boast of having the polls on its side. “86% of French people are in favor, for example, of the expulsion of foreign offenders at the end of their prison sentence”quoted on December 12 in the Hemicycle Philippe Pradal, Horizons deputy for Alpes-Maritimes, by repeating an IFOP survey carried out for the far-right magazine Black book.

“Not neutral” instruments

“The polls are almost all in the same direction, agrees Jérôme Fourquet. The general public does not necessarily have a very precise idea of ​​the text, which itself has evolved over time, but there is a fairly majority of the population in support of two things: on the one hand, the need for better control flows and, on the other, the regularization of undocumented immigrants. » Which corresponds, originally, to the presentation of the two main main lines of the text by the government, although it went from less than thirty to nearly a hundred articles when it was adopted by the Senate, including in particular measures on access to social benefits, the tightening of family reunification or the questioning of land rights.

“We should keep in mind that polls usually are not impartial devicesadditionally warns Vincent Tiberj, sociologist at Sciences Po Bordeaux. Depending on the query you ask, you’ll be able to underestimate or overestimate xenophobic opinions. And entry panels [panels en lignes constitués d’internautes disponibles pour répondre aux sondages] are inclined to overestimate right-wing views. We noticed it throughout the presidential election. »

You have 55% of this text left to learn. The relaxation is reserved for subscribers.