Macron tries to quell the federal government disaster after the approval of the brand new immigration legislation | International | EUROtoday

French President Emmanuel Macron will enchantment to the French Constitutional Court to confirm whether or not the brand new immigration legislation is authorized and respects basic rights. The legislation was adopted on Tuesday night time within the National Assembly with votes in favor of the standard proper, the acute proper and a majority of deputies who help Macron. But 1 / 4 of Macronists voted towards or abstained. The president is now attempting to quell the riot. It is not going to be simple. The Minister of Health, Aurélien Rousseau, has already introduced that he’ll resign. Others, positioned within the social democratic wing of the Government, have threatened to take action as nicely.

The left and part of Macronism contemplate that the legislation breaks the precept of equality for residents of France and, much more severely, it assumes with out saying one of many totems of the acute proper, the so-called nationwide choice. That is, the precedence for French individuals over foreigners, even when they’ve the required residence and work permits, when accessing the sturdy French social safety system. Marine Le Pen, chief of the far-right National Rally (RN) celebration and aspiring to succeed Macron within the Elysée, celebrated the adoption of the textual content as an “ideological victory” for her celebration, the National Rally.

“I will submit [el proyecto de ley] to the Constitutional Council because I think that there are provisions that are not in accordance with our Constitution,” Macron declared in an interview on the political discuss present C à vous, on the general public channel France 5. The Constitutional Council performs the features of the Constitutional Court in France.

Macron justified that the ultimate textual content “is the fruit of a compromise.” “It’s the shield we were missing,” he summarized. He framed it within the European Union migration settlement authorized virtually concurrently in Brussels: “What we do in Europe with the asylum and immigration pact and this law will allow us to fight more effectively against clandestine networks and return people who are irregularly in our territory.” He defended that the opposite goal, within the French case, is “to integrate better, through language learning and work.”

The model adopted shouldn’t be the one which Macron initially wished, extra balanced between repressive and progressive measures. But, missing an absolute majority within the National Assembly, they wanted the votes of the opposition. And they ended up agreeing on a harsher and extra right-wing model of the textual content with the right-wing Republicans, the bulk within the Senate. The Constitutional Council might annul some articles and soften the legislation once more.

Land legislation

Critics denounce that the legislation questions basic rules of the Republic. One of them is that in France the nationality of a citizen doesn’t rely on his origins, however on the place the place he was born, in response to the custom of the so-called proper of the soil, versus the appropriate of blood. Until now, a baby of foreigners robotically turned French on the age of 18. Now he must ask for it. The concept is that whoever needs to be French, expresses their will to be so, with out it being automated.

Another criticism factors to the duty for international college students to deposit a deposit after they come to check in France. It is a measure, impressed by the appropriate, that seeks to stop individuals who need to immigrate to France from enrolling in universities to acquire a visa, after which not going to class. The rectors of the colleges denounced in an announcement that this measure “goes against the multi-secular tradition of openness to the world of the French university” and “is an insult to the Enlightenment.”

The most controversial measure is the one which toughens the circumstances in order that foreigners, even when they’ve a piece and residence allow, obtain household or housing help. That this establishes a distinction between the French and foreigners is what leads critics to say that Macron has adopted nationwide choice, an idea till now poisonous to most events besides the far proper.

The progressive newspaper The world, in an editorial, laments: “Since forty years ago, the French political debate adopted the issue of immigration, rarely has a government expressed such a degree of commitment to forces that thrive by designating the foreigner as a scapegoat.” For Le Figarothe political disaster is the results of the “denial [por parte de Macron] of his lack of an absolute majority in the Assembly, which exposes him to the shifting sands of the oppositions, and of the denial, above all, of the central place that immigration occupies in the French evil. The conservative newspaper believes that the president tried for too long to please both the left and the right, and did not understand that, on the issue of immigration, public opinion leans to the right.

In the interview on France 5, Macron denied that the measures represent a break with the fundamental values ​​of the Republic, but admitted that he does not like some of them: “Did I ask for them or did the Government promote them? No. Do they represent an ontological break, of regime? No.” Le Pen’s claim of an “ideological victory” is “a crude maneuver,” said the president, since until the last minute his party had opposed the law. Faced with the accusation, made by former socialist president François Hollande and others, of assuming the ideas of the extreme right, he replied: “If we close our eyes, if we say that there is no immigration problem, we play the game of National Regrouping.”

Of the six or seven ministers who threatened to resign, only one has confirmed it in public. “I don’t give leftist or moral lessons to anyone,” he told The world the head of Health, Rousseau. “I clinically confirm that it is not possible for me to explain this text.” This minister belongs to the social democratic wing of the Government. He was also director of the prime minister’s cabinet, also from the social democracy.

One of the effects of the law may be the breakdown of the balance between the different currents of Macronism, a movement that sought to be transversal and bring together moderates from the left and the right. The crisis has left deep wounds. They will take time to close.

Follow all the international information on Facebook y Xor our weekly newsletter.

_