The “irregularities” of the Daniel Sancho case in Thailand: a fictitious lawyer and an unattainable promise | EUROtoday

The workplace that collaborates with the younger man’s protection warns that they made him signal a false doc and that they promised to deport him inside 48 hours

• Daniel Sancho All the information concerning the case
• Trial in Thailand Sancho Case: the prosecutor says that there was premeditation and the forensic specialists can not decide the causes of Arrieta’s loss of life

The judicial process in opposition to Daniel Sancho for the crime of the Colombian surgeon Edwin Arrieta It is in a decisive part earlier than the listening to room opens for the younger man subsequent April 3. For this purpose, the crew that collaborates together with her protection – made up of the lawyer Carmen Balfagnthe criminologist Ramn Chippirrs y Marcos García-Montes– they work in opposition to the clock within the course of.

This Friday morning, they held a joint press convention to reveal the “irregularities” they’ve detected within the Thai Police investigation. This suspicion was all the time current for the authorized representatives of Rodolfo Sancho, father of Daniel. However, it’s the first time that they’ve talked about these irregularities publicly.

They preserve that the Thai Police deceived Daniel and that, amongst different issues, the younger man testified within the first moments with no lawyer. Specifically, the Balfagn-Chippirrs workplace has indicated that the investigators made Daniel consider that if he confessed he would return to Spain. “within 48 hours”. In addition, they’ve revealed that they deceived him with the determine of the lawyer. They launched him as a lawyer to a person who, in actuality, was a police agent. Balfagn claimed that they gave him “false documents” to signal.

“From minute one he is promised deportation in 48 hours and a document is given to his signature. From minute one he declares that there had been a fight, an attempted sexual assault and that he defended himself. They gave him a signature. a deportation order despite not having legal or legal capacity“Balfagn has insisted. “There are recordings that confirm this but the Police say the opposite. Transcribe other things.”

“A murder can never be accidental. A death can be,” he declared.

Balfagn, Chippirrs and García-Montes have been working for months to show that Edwin Arrieta’s loss of life was unintended and never premeditated, because the police within the Asian nation declare. They insist that Sancho killed Arrieta throughout a struggle as a result of the sufferer, they insist, wished to pressure the younger man to have sexual relations.

The goal of this work is to keep away from the capital punishment or life imprisonment requested by the Prosecutor in Thailand, and thus be capable to acquire a lowered sentence – with the choice of ending it in Spain, if the mandatory situations are met. The Balfagn-Chippirs agency and Marcos Garca-Montes perceive that there are turning factors all through the police investigation that might flip Daniel Sancho’s state of affairs round.

Sancho is accused of three crimes: premeditated homicide, concealment of the physique and destruction of different folks’s documentation. He, nevertheless, assured the choose on the listening to that the crime occurred by accident, after a struggle between the 2. Likewise, he pleaded not responsible to destruction of one other’s documentation, in reference to the disappearance of Edwin Arrieta’s passport.

The two males had met the earlier 12 months by means of Instagram due to their curiosity in gastronomy and, after a number of conferences elsewhere all over the world, they traveled individually to Phanganwith the intention of assembly on this Thai island.

Witnesses on the trial

The trial will final two weeks and may have no less than 57 witnesses between all events. The Prosecutor’s Office will current 28 witnesses, whereas the attorneys representing Edwin Arrieta’s household embody two witnesses on their record, amongst whom are the sufferer’s mother and father.

On the primary day of the listening to, each the protection, the prosecutor and the attorneys representing the sufferer’s household will be capable to make a five-minute opening assertion. Afterwards, the testimony of witnesses will start, which will probably be in particular person.

The first to testify would be the witnesses of the Prosecutor’s Office, who will give option to these summoned by Daniel Sancho’s lawyer, the ex-officio lawyer. Apricot Srinuel. Once this course of is completed, on May 3, the events will be capable to make a remaining argument and a brand new date will probably be set to learn the ruling.

In addition, the Balfagn-Chippirrs workplace will put within the palms of Sancho’s lawyer in Thailand a report that analyzes all of the gadgets that the younger man purchased and on which the Thai police relied to ascertain their speculation of premeditation.

The doc analyzes the conclusions that the Thai brokers conveyed within the press convention after the crime, analyzing every of the weather introduced by the Police as occasional gadgets which Daniel Sancho purchased in his capability as a chef and follower of Thai delicacies. For this purpose, his skilled title has a outstanding place within the file for the reason that bulk of the conclusions revolve round it.

The younger man confessed that he killed the Colombian surgeon throughout a struggle on August 3 and that he then dismembered him as a result of, in response to him, he was afraid of his alleged threats. Since his arrest, Sancho has all the time maintained that Arrieta had him subjected to stress and threats reminiscent of, for instance, making public intimate pictures of the younger man or harming members of his household.