The Prosecutor's Office now admits that there are two stories however says that García Ortiz solely knew “seriously” the one which exonerates Puigdemont | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.


The press workplace of the State Attorney General This Monday, a letter from the Supreme Court prosecutor was despatched, lvaro Redondoaccountable for writing the report on Puigdemont that the Board of Criminal Prosecutors will debate tomorrow, the place the prosecutor himself acknowledges that he ready two paperwork in regards to the Junts chief.

In the press launch, signed by Redondo, the prosecutor of the High Court – who, as EL MUNDO has revealed solely in a primary report, noticed indicators of terrorism in opposition to the fugitive, asking the Supreme Court to open a case in opposition to him and in a second doc requests to the Second Chamber to reject the reasoned assertion – explains that “on Tuesday, January 30, first thing in the morning, I attended a hearing with the State Attorney General,” in reference to Álvaro García Ortiz.

According to the model given by the TS prosecutor, Redondo “briefly advanced” the that means of the draft of his second report back to the legal professional common. In it, he states that the proof taken under consideration by the trainer of the National Court “in order to present the reasoned exposition, are too open, to be able to affirm that the procedural situation exists that would reasonably allow the Supreme Court to assume the competence”. This is acknowledged within the doc to which this newspaper has had entry. In the primary of the stories, Redondo appreciated, nonetheless, terrorism in Puigdemont's conduct.

Likewise, prosecutor Álvaro Redondo – along with corroborating the existence of the assembly revealed by this implies earlier than the Board of Prosecutors held final week – additionally confirms that he advised a number of of his Penal colleagues final Tuesday the that means of his draft after dispatch with García Ortiz.

Different fiscal sources consulted clarify that the prosecutor didn’t give any rationalization about his radical change of opinion and totally different Supreme Court prosecutors pointed to the assembly with García Ortiz because the origin of the change. Álvaro Redondo, nonetheless, signifies that the legal professional common didn’t give him any directions.

Sources from the Board consulted by this newspaper clarify that the change of thoughts of this conservative prosecutor generated shock amongst a few of his colleagues, conscious that there was a primary report, very elaborate, the place he did help opening a case within the Supreme Court in opposition to the previous president. Catalan for terrorism.

In the primary of the stories, dated January 26, 63 pages lengthy, which bears his signature, it’s maintained that Puigdemont's participation in conduct consisting of finishing up acts that affected mentioned authorized property, with the plain intention of significantly violating public peace and obliging public powers, may be thought-about, a minimum of at this procedural second, as a prison offense, and particularly as against the law of terrorism.

In the second of the stories, signed 4 days later, the prosecutor guidelines out the crime of terrorism and affirms that within the case of Democratic Tsunami there have been crimes of public dysfunction.

EL MUNDO contacted the State Attorney General's Office this Sunday to acquire García Ortiz's model of the assembly with Redondo and the explanation why there have been two contradictory stories written by the identical prosecutor in just some days. The legal professional common assured this newspaper that it was “flatly false” that there have been two stories. Today, the Supreme Court prosecutor admits, nonetheless, its existence.