Scholz considers Trump's try and relativize NATO's help assure “irresponsible and dangerous” | International | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Monday sharply rejected former US President Donald Trump's feedback that he wouldn’t defend NATO allies that don’t attain 2% of gross home product (GDP) in protection spending if he returns. to the White House after the November presidential elections. “Any relativization of NATO's assistance guarantee is irresponsible and dangerous,” Scholz stated at a joint press convention with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk in Berlin, wherein he recalled the significance of NATO's frequent protection clause. the group: “All for one and one for all.”

These statements reply “solely to the interests of Russia,” Scholz criticized. “No one should play or negotiate with the security of Europe,” he added through the look on the Berlin Chancellery, wherein he insisted that NATO relies on the precept that “every centimeter of NATO land will be defended.” one thing that “everyone can trust that it will be so.”

Tusk pointed in the identical path as his German colleague, however took the chance to emphasise that, no matter Trump's phrases, all NATO members should improve their protection spending. “I am convinced that Trump's words should be like a cold shower for all of us,” declared the Polish Prime Minister, recalling that his nation has already reached the objective of spending 2% of GDP on protection. “The lesson we can draw from the attack on Ukraine is that no one doubts that we must improve our defensive potential. Europe must be able to face any challenge,” he added.

In this fashion, Tusk insisted on the necessity to “systematically increase defense efforts within NATO in the coming years.” All of this whatever the election outcomes that happen within the fall within the United States, he added.

A powerful EU militarily

Tusk thus took benefit of his first go to to Berlin after being sworn in final December to recollect the significance of the European Union being “not only an economic power, but also a military one.” “The EU cannot be weak in the military field.”

Join EL PAÍS to observe all of the information and browse with out limits.


The German Chancellor recalled, for his half, the extraordinary allocation of 100 billion euros introduced final yr, which can make it doable to realize in 2024 for the primary time in additional than three a long time the NATO goal of two% of GDP in protection spending and which had already been highlighted a number of hours earlier through the groundbreaking ceremony for a brand new ammunition manufacturing unit of the Rheinmetall arms firm.

“It is an urgent need. As harsh as this reality is, we do not live in times of peace. Russia's war of aggression and Putin's imperial ambitions, which he is openly expressing, are a major threat to the European peace order. In this situation, if you want peace, you have to successfully deter potential aggressors,” he declared to these liable for the brand new manufacturing unit.

The look of the 2 European leaders thus centered on the statements of the virtually sure Republican candidate for the presidency of the United States Donald Trump, who stated final weekend that he’ll “encourage” Russia to “do whatever it wants.” towards any NATO nation that, in its opinion, doesn’t spend sufficient on collective protection.

These statements have been additionally harshly criticized by the German president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who additionally described them as “irresponsible” and “playing into Russia's hands.” “And no one in our alliance can have any interest in it.”

The former US president had already repeated prior to now that it was unfair that the United States needed to take accountability for the protection of the opposite 30 member states. In specific, he criticized Europeans for not spending sufficient on weapons.

Follow all of the worldwide info on Facebook y Xor our weekly publication.

Subscribe to proceed studying

Read with out limits