Jonathann Daval information a criticism in opposition to his ex-in-law for defamation | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

L'Jonathann Daval's lawyer denounces “judicial revisionism”. Me Randall Schwerdorffer introduced the submitting of a criticism in opposition to Alexia Daval's household after the published of the sequence Alexia, our daughter, on Canal+, based on info from RTL. The feedback made within the sequence, significantly within the fourth episode, quantity to defamation based on the lawyer. In his criticism, he assures that Isabelle Fouillot and her daughter Stéphanie ship “an unprecedented version” of the affair the place they maintain Jonathann Daval “responsible for Alexia’s miscarriage”.

The night newspaper

Every night at 6 p.m.

Receive the knowledge analyzed and deciphered by the Point editorial workers.

Your registration has been taken under consideration with the e-mail deal with:

To uncover all our different newsletters, go right here: MyAccount

By registering, you settle for the overall circumstances of use and our confidentiality coverage.

In the sequence, broadcast in November 2023, the sufferer's mom and sister guarantee that the miscarriage “was not accidental”. Isabelle Fouillot even goes as far as to declare that her daughter was “not aware that he drugged her”. In his criticism, Jonathann Daval's lawyer believes that she “clearly implies that the miscarriage was caused by Jonathann's administration of medicinal substances to Alexia”.

“A series of misinformation”

This concept of intentional poisoning, put ahead by the civil events throughout the assize trial, was nonetheless dismissed by the Court. According to the forensic physician, the dose of treatment discovered within the sufferer's physique was too low to be the results of intentional poisoning.

READ ALSO Esquivillon, Daval, Jubillar… Why such a protracted wait earlier than the arrest? This is why the statements of Alexia Daval's mom and sister are in “total contradiction with the judgment of the Haute-Saône Assize Court”, for the lawyer, who judges that the Canal+ sequence is “a series of complete disinformation on the Daval affair”.