The inclusion of abortion within the Constitution delayed by the Senate? | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.


VSThis shouldn’t be the primary time they’ve used such a ploy. But as our colleagues from HuffPost famous on Tuesday February 27, the inclusion of voluntary termination of being pregnant (abortion) within the Constitution remains to be the topic of debate within the Senate. And significantly amongst Republican senators. On Monday February 26, Bruno Retailleau and Philippe Bas tabled a brand new modification, two days earlier than the textual content was examined within the hemicycle. The mentioned modification goals to “remove the term “guarantee” added by the federal government in an effort to restore the model adopted by the Senate a 12 months in the past”.

The political e-newsletter

Every Thursday at 7:30 a.m.

Receive a preview of data and political analyzes from the Point editorial workers.

THANKS !
Your registration has been taken under consideration with the e-mail deal with:

To uncover all our different newsletters, go right here: MyAccount

By registering, you settle for the final situations of use and our confidentiality coverage.

More exactly, this modification goals, specify the deputies, “to remove the legal uncertainties which weigh on the use of the term “guarantee””. The time period has been the topic of debate for a number of weeks. On January 30, in the course of the vote on the textual content within the National Assembly, it was most popular to that of “law”. A semantic choice which took the type of a compromise, to encourage the vote of essentially the most recalcitrant to the constitutionalization of abortion. And particularly Les Républicains, a crucial hyperlink to deliver the mission to fruition.

New vote within the Assembly?

“For a certain number, guaranteed freedom means a right. And this is not at all the meaning of what was discussed a few months ago,” warned Bruno Retailleau on Public Senate, January 23. He then mentioned he was against the constitutionalization of abortion.

A selection that might shake up the legislative calendar. Indeed, if the modification is adopted and the invoice voted on in these phrases, it must be mentioned once more within the Assembly. Indeed, based on the regulation, a invoice should be adopted in precisely the identical phrases by each chambers. And there’s nothing to point that the National Assembly will vote on a textual content evoking “freedom” and not a “guaranteed freedom”.


https://www.lepoint.fr/politique/l-inscription-de-l-ivg-dans-la-constitution-retardee-par-le-senat-27-02-2024-2553687_20.php