why it’s crucial to go to the theater to see this masterpiece! | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.


HASadapt Dune on the cinema, mission not possible? This query has bothered me for a few years. This is a degree that I handle at size within the first a part of my essay. Dune, a science fiction masterpiece (Pocket Imaginary, 2023). Like the Lord of the Rings, Frank Herbert's novel has a tumultuous historical past with the seventh artwork. After Alejandro Jodorowsky's pharaonic aborted mission, David Lynch was unable to do justice to a textual content of which he was nonetheless a superb connoisseur.

With Dune: half two, Denis Villeneuve rises to an immense problem. Even extra spectacular and rhythmic than the primary opus, whereas having actual depth, his characteristic movie is each a vibrant tribute to the work of Frank Herbert and a really private rewriting of this wealthy science fiction universe. As when he tackled the variation of the primary half of the novel, Villeneuve is respectful of the unique materials. His ardour for Dune, born throughout her adolescence, shines by way of each second of her movie. If Dune: half two is a Hollywood blockbuster, it’s much more an arthouse movie. Better: a declaration of affection addressed to a piece to which Villeneuve has at all times devoted true worship.

This adaptation of the second half of Frank Herbert's novel is a marvel. A visible and sound expertise from which we can not depart detached. The most important scene of a huge epic and an intra-family tragedy, the fascinating desert of Arrakis is a personality in its personal proper within the plot. Of fascinating magnificence, the pure settings are the place of an initiatory journey each for the younger Paul Atréides and for the spectators, as the sensation of immersion is powerful.

Reason versus fanaticism

Denis Villeneuve continues to develop the principle characters of the primary movie, whereas succeeding in introducing new main antagonists. The character of Feyd-Rautha (unimaginable Austin Butler), nephew of the horrible Baron Harkonnen, fascinates with a darkness which makes him much more horrifying than his uncle. A feat! Villeneuve additionally achieves the feat of giving an actual place within the plot to Princess Irulan, a wise selection once we know her significance in The Messiah of Dunethe second quantity that the Canadian director desires of adapting.

By taking up the problem of bringing probably the most learn science fiction novel on the earth to the display screen, Denis Villeneuve introduced Dune like a ” Star Wars for adults.” Faithful to Frank Herbert's will, his film vigorously denounces the dangerous connections of politics with heroism and religion. The fanaticism of the Fremen leader Stilgar is opposed by the critical gaze of Chani, with whom Paul Atréides will fall madly in love. Even more independent than in the novel, the young woman embodies the light of reason in a society tempted to give in to the sirens of messianism. The rewriting of this feminine and feminist character, played by one of the most popular actresses in the world (Zendaya), is a strong act: as the acknowledged heir of Herbert, Villeneuve invites us to never abandon our faculty of judgment, whatever whatever the leaders and the circumstances.

While being a complex work, Dune: part two manages to address everyone. The liberties taken with the original material are often necessary: ​​they aim in particular not to put off newbies to this fictional universe. A real adult in the body of a child, the character of Alia, Paul's little sister, is presented in the novel as an abomination. Denis Villeneuve cleverly succeeds in integrating it into his plot without arousing the same feeling of disturbing strangeness as in Lynch's film.

The Canadian director also ensures that the outcome is less ambiguous than with Herbert. Bittersweet, the final act of his sand tragedy only partially celebrates the triumph of nature and freedom over artificiality and oppression. In a mirror effect with a scene from the beginning of the film, we witness the incineration of the defeated adversaries. The identity of the victims changes, but the act performed is exactly the same. A way of showing that the cycle of violence is not about to end. We are here a long way from the last minutes of Return of the Jedi (1983), third film in a trilogy loosely inspired by Dune. For Villeneuve, victory by arms does not constitute a climax, but only a stage, which does not generate any jubilation or calm.

To mark its differences with the saga created by George Lucas, Dune: part two carefully avoids any form of Manichaeism. Like Paul Atréides, the main character that Timothée Chalamet embodies with great accuracy, it is chiaroscuro that dominates here. An idea masterfully staged on Giedi Prime, planet of the Harkonnen. Lit by a low intensity sun, it immerses the characters there in a constant marriage of black and white. A perfect metaphor for Dunea universe in which the notions of good and evil tend to merge as the plot progresses.

Probable triumph, new era?

Unlike several blockbusters from the years 2010-2020, Dune: part two is not just another demonstration of the fantastic power of visual effects. If the latter are an undeniable success, they do not overwhelm the film with their presence. On the contrary, Denis Villeneuve puts them at the service of a story whose power lies above all in the richness of its themes and the complexity of its characters, all remarkably interpreted.

The Canadian director not solely pays homage to Frank Herbert's masterpiece. He works extra usually in favor of science fiction. Long thought-about futile, this style skilled a serious turning level in 1965 with the publication of Dune. Frank Herbert supposed to supply his readers an escape and an journey like no different. But, much more, he wished to ascertain sturdy hyperlinks between science fiction and fields as completely different as poetry, philosophy, politics, psychology and ecology. A novel of beautiful richness, Dune is a masterpiece of literature.

While taking needed liberties with the unique materials, Villeneuve's characteristic movie retains its spirit and complexity. Unlike unhealthy variations of literary works, it doesn’t encourage one to return to the unique supply to remorse that it was sacrificed within the title of a needed cinematic simplification. No, Dune: half two is a journey to a distant galaxy however above all a mirrored image on our world and its future. This movie isn’t against the novel on which it’s impressed: it completes it and magnifies its visionary character. Above all, it’s a great invitation to learn or reread it.

Dune: half two is a pinnacle of the seventh artwork and maybe – that is my hope – a turning level within the Hollywood trade. Let's hope that Denis Villeneuve's demanding cinema might be emulated. At the time of reboot king and infinite tales that demystify even probably the most stable sagas, the possible triumph of Dune might properly mark the beginning of a brand new period. All on Arrakis? Yes ! And even past!

* Nicolas Allard is an affiliate professor of contemporary literature in preparatory courses and an essayist within the fields of science fiction and popular culture. A specialist within the work of Frank Herbert, he’s the writer of “Dune, a masterpiece of science fiction” (Pocket Imaginaire, version corrected and expanded by the writer in collaboration together with his editor Charlotte Volper, 2023).


https://www.lepoint.fr/pop-culture/dune-deuxieme-partie-pourquoi-il-est-imperatif-de-se-rendre-tous-sur-arrakis-27-02-2024-2553653_2920.php