Terrorist assault exposes Putin’s vulnerabilities in Russia | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

When Vladimir Putin lastly spoke concerning the worst terrorist assault to hit Russia in 20 years, he swept over the evident failure of his safety state to forestall the assault, which left a minimum of 133 lifeless, regardless of a transparent warning from the United States on March 7 {that a} strike on a live performance corridor may very well be imminent.

He additionally made no reference to the Islamic State, which claimed accountability for the assault on the Crocus City live performance corridor on Friday and which Putin denounced repeatedly as an enemy all through Russia’s lengthy navy intervention in Syria. In 2017, Putin declared victory over the Islamic State, also called ISIS.

Putin as an alternative used his five-minute televised handle on Saturday to emphasise that the 4 direct perpetrators have been “moving toward Ukraine” after they have been detained and that “a window was prepared for them from the Ukrainian side to cross the state border.” He didn’t straight accuse Ukraine, which has denied any involvement, however a reference to “Nazis” — his regular label for the Ukrainian authorities — made clear that he was blaming Kyiv.

But the ugly movies of the attackers with computerized weapons coldly murdering harmless concertgoers and setting ablaze one of many Russian capital’s hottest leisure venues smashed by means of Putin’s efforts to current Russia as sturdy, united and resilient.

The strike occurred simply 5 days after his triumphant declare of a brand new six-year time period in an election that was closely managed by the Kremlin and extensively denounced overseas as failing to fulfill democratic requirements. Putin used the election to say enormous public assist for his insurance policies.

Despite Putin’s rhetoric searching for to implicate Ukraine, analysts, former U.S. safety officers and members of the Russian elite mentioned the assault underscored the vulnerabilities of Putin’s wartime regime, which have been additionally evident when Yevgeniy Prigozhin led his Wagner mercenaries in a short mutiny aiming to oust prime protection officers in June.

“The regime shows its weakness in such critical situations, just as it did during the mutiny by Prigozhin,” mentioned Andrei Kolesnikov, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. Though Prigozhin deserted the rebellion, the injury was clear. Then, as throughout this weekend’s occasions, Putin didn’t seem for hours earlier than lastly addressing the emergency. “In difficult moments, Putin always disappears,” Kolesnikov mentioned.

Just three days earlier than the Crocus City assault, Putin dismissed the U.S. warning a few potential imminent terrorist assault as “open blackmail” and as “an attempt to frighten and destabilize our society.”

But together with his authoritarian grip on energy and just about nobody keen to problem him, the Russian chief is unlikely to face any criticism or penalties for failing to take the warning extra significantly.

When Russia was hit by terrorist assaults up to now, Putin typically accused the West of stoking them, most notably after the Beslan faculty siege of 2004, which left over 330 hostages lifeless. Then, he claimed the assault had been engineered by those that wished to weaken Russia and aimed for its “disintegration.”

Analysts mentioned the Russian chief would nearly actually search to take action this time, as properly. A lead Kremlin propagandist, Margarita Simonyan, the pinnacle of state broadcaster RT, was already claiming on Saturday that the Americans’ warning forward of the assault indicated they have been contributors in getting ready it.

The former U.S. officers and analysts mentioned rhetoric blaming Ukraine and the collective West was prone to proceed and will result in additional crackdowns as Putin seeks to provoke his nation for a protracted conflict.

Others mentioned the bloodshed raised eerie echoes of an period Putin thought was lengthy behind him — throughout his first two phrases as president within the 2000s, when Russia was wracked by lethal terrorist assaults that he later used to justify harsh responses by the navy and safety companies and to strengthen his rule.

They pointed to the obvious lack of ample safety at Crocus City, an enormous leisure and purchasing venue on the outskirts of Moscow, regardless of the warning from the U.S. authorities.

“Crocus City is a gigantic place with many concert halls,” mentioned one Moscow businessman, noting that the Moscow regional authorities’s places of work are shut by. “There should have been serious security, and there should have been a lot of police.”

“There is a lack of responsibility for security at large public events,” the businessman mentioned, talking on the situation of anonymity for concern of retribution. “Almost the same thing happened 20 years ago during the Nord Ost theater siege, and nothing has changed since then,” he mentioned, referring to the 2002 hostage disaster that left greater than 115 lifeless after Chechen terrorists seized a theater in central Moscow.

A Russian educational with shut ties to senior Moscow diplomats supplied an identical evaluation of Russia’s failure to forestall Friday night time’s assault. “It’s clear that we will search for Ukrainian fingerprints and possibly those of Western security services,” the tutorial mentioned, talking on the situation of anonymity as a result of Putin’s regime typically retaliates towards critics. “But probably any investigation will find failures by our security services.”

Russia’s safety companies have poured huge sources into monitoring the actions of opponents of the Putin regime, utilizing facial recognition know-how to trace and query those that participated within the current protest towards Putin’s election or who laid flowers in honor of Alexei Navalny, the opposition chief who died in jail final month.

But offering ample safety for residents towards threats emanating from identified terrorist teams seems to have slipped down the record of priorities, analysts mentioned, regardless of the nation persistently dealing with terrorist assaults through the years, together with two claimed or attributed to the Islamic State in 2019.

Earlier this month, the Russian Federal Security Service, or FSB, mentioned it had foiled an assault being ready by the Islamic State on a synagogue in Moscow and had “neutralized” an unknown variety of the group’s militants throughout a raid within the Kaluga area, southwest of the capital. Kazakhstan later confirmed that two of its residents have been killed within the raid.

Last 12 months, the Tass information company reported that the FSB had killed two different Islamic State militants planning to assault a chemical facility in Kaluga.

“Everywhere there is the feeling we are living in a police state which is closely watching every citizen,” Kolesnikov mentioned. “People now are often stopped and checked at the entrance to the metro system. At airports, security has become much tougher. … There really is a question how this could happen at all.”

Others mentioned Russian safety failures weren’t an exception, however the norm.

“Unless it’s a really high-profile public event like the Olympics or where Putin is involved … Russia’s guard on serious security is always down,” mentioned one former senior U.S. intelligence official, talking on the situation of anonymity to debate delicate issues. “You really need to have an elaborate system focused on these kind of threats, and they have been focused elsewhere.”

During his televised handle on Saturday, Putin didn’t handle an evaluation by U.S. officers who mentioned there was “no reason to doubt” the declare of accountability by a department of the Islamic State based mostly in Afghanistan.

Russian state media nonetheless has broadcast footage of a minimum of two of the alleged attackers being interrogated, together with one wherein the suspect spoke Tajik, the language of Tajikistan, a Central Asian nation bordering Afghanistan.

The former U.S. officers mentioned the potential terrorist menace emanating from Central Asia had turn into a blind spot of the Putin regime whereas it targeted on pursuing political enemies in Russia and on threats ensuing from Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, together with drone strikes and cross-border assaults.

“They have not prioritized the threat from ISIS that includes many Central Asians,” mentioned Douglas London, a former senior CIA officer who has specialised in counterterrorism and Central Asia and serves as an adjunct affiliate professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. “Thousands of Central Asians joined the Islamic State, and many returned from Syria and Iraq after the loss of the caliphate. A lot of them rose to very senior positions and had come from either the army, the police or the intelligence services of a number of Central Asian states.”

“The Central Asian element of ISIS had always targeted Russia,” London added. “I don’t think there is shock and surprise in Russian intelligence that there was an issue. It just simply wasn’t sufficiently high on their agenda.”

Mary Ilyushina in Berlin and Natalia Abbakumova in Riga, Latvia, contributed to this report.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/03/24/vladimir-putin-terror-attack-russia/