The successor: Oedipus and the disastrous adventures of the patriarchy (****) | EUROtoday

All detective novels reproduce the Oedipal tragedy in a method or one other. Oedipus – grasp of fixing riddles to the despair of the Sphinx – sees himself one good day, issues of a nasty afternoon, on the throne of Thebes. It's all congratulations. In it 'pack'The crown consists of Queen Jocasta and even a big household. And so on till the looks of a horrible plague able to put an finish to a lot supervening happiness. Way to finish misfortune? Solve the thriller of the demise of the traditional king. And that’s the place Oedipus changed into Marlowe has no rival. Why was Laius (the earlier monarch) killed? What is Tiresias, the soothsayer, hiding? What does Creon, who aspired to the place of Oedipus himself, have in all this? We don’t reveal something if we anticipate that Oedipus's shock will likely be monumental when he realizes that, in reality, he’s the offender. He killed Laius, his father; He is chargeable for the suicide of Jocasta, his mom, and he’s the one who will likely be left with out eyes in order to not see a lot incestuous horror. Every discovery of fact is nothing greater than self-discovery. Y as.

'The successor' She is aware of she is the inheritor of Oedipus. And as such it behaves between incest, the revelation of an historical taboo, horror and, certainly, shock. The story is advised of a person who in the future is shocked by the demise of his father. Our protagonist is none aside from the star designer of a well-known vogue home. When he goes from the Paris the place he works to Montreal the place his father has died, he’ll come nose to nose with a type of secrets and techniques that not solely change a life, they even spoil it.

The son will first uncover that the daddy he thought he knew and whom he hated was one other, one other individual with one other life, who deserved to be hated much more. But the shock, in actuality, comes later. When in a second discovery he realizes that every little thing that disgusts him in regards to the deceased is strictly him, then there will likely be no treatment. Discovering that you’re what you’ve spent your complete life attempting to not be, first disconcerting after which, on the very least, distressing. It sounds convoluted or great and, as has already been mentioned, it’s nothing greater than Oedipus one step away from gouging out his eyes. So apparent.

Legrand as soon as once more resorts to essentially the most conventional and easy components of classical tragedy to compose a contemporary intrigue very near terror. He already did it earlier than, in 2017, when he shocked with 'Shared custody'; a rereading of essentially the most fundamental concern from the supposedly peaceable house of the household. The new movie begins with a wierd, overhead shot of a vogue present. It is a baroque, exuberant and unusually complicated picture. Almost a dream. The scene looks like a type of prologue that, in its personal manner, contradicts every little thing that comes after. What follows is a linear story, however filled with accidents that, removed from being merely arbitrary, appear fairly cathartic. They usually are not methods, they’re disasters. What is settled is how heredity finally ends up figuring out a superb a part of what we’re, even when we don't wish to, even when we’re by no means conscious of it.

A slight ache within the chest reveals to the protagonist the opportunity of carrying a coronary heart situation in his genes. But not solely that, DNA may also be the repository of the darkest. Yeah 'Shared custody'changed into a monster the obsession of a loving father immediately dispossessed of his son, 'The Successor' is extra delicate and crueler on the identical time. Now, it’s the son who, with the passage of time, finds out that he’s possessed by the daddy. Violence (sexist violence, to place it merely) is inherited, it’s there, it possesses us, it could be the in no way hidden ethical of this feverish movie exhibition. as tremendously efficient (and efficient, why not) as, certainly, oedipal.

—

Director: Xavier Legrand. Interpreters: Marc-Andr Grondin, Yves Jacques, Louis Champagne, Anne-Elisabeth Bossm, Blandine Bury. Duracin: 107 minutes. Nationality: France.