EU defence reforms will not instantly assist Ukraine: Former prime NATO official Camille Grand | EUROtoday
Issued on:
The EU’s proposed defence reforms aren’t going to make a distinction to Ukraine within the brief time period, warns Camille Grand, NATO’s former assistant secretary normal for defence funding. Both the European Defence Industrial Strategy (EDIS) and the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) “are going to be very useful in the longer term, provided that the money comes in 2028, which is more or less the cycle that the EU is announcing”, Grand tells Talking Europe. He talks about Ukraine’s ammunition scarcity – a topic on which he put ahead a 10-point plan on the European Council on Foreign Relations, the place he’s distinguished coverage fellow. We additionally focus on how NATO has advanced because the begin of the struggle, and the methods wherein, in response to Grand, NATO and the EU can – and may – work collectively extra intently.
On EDIS and EDIP, “there is neither the money nor the support of the Member States and industry to allow those initiatives to make a difference today to Ukrainians, or to rebuild our own stockpiles,” Grand says.
“According to the EU treaties, defence remains a competency for the member states,” he goes on. “As the Commission affirms its intention to become an important player in this domain and hopefully with significant money on the table, there will be a tension with the member states who will want to see what’s the added value of the Commission, and how is that going to fit with their own priorities and requirements.”
Grand additionally addresses the latest announcement by France’s minister of the armed forces, who stated that the French authorities may drive companies to place defence orders earlier than civilian ones if manufacturing doesn’t pace up. “This is really about critical components and subcomponents. If you think of ammunition production or missile production, there are some components which might be microelectronics or very basic things like black powder, that need to be prioritised for defence needs,” Grand explains. The French authorities are making “a fair request”, Grand says. “You can’t say, on the one hand, ‘we’re in a war economy’, and on the other hand say, ‘oh, it’s a pity that some of the ammunition production is not available because we are competing with civilian needs’.”
On the potential return of Donald Trump to the White House and Europeans “Trump-proofing” their safety, Grand says: “We have to prepare for a whole range of scenarios. And we have to be serious about defence over a decade. So that is being able to act with possibly less American commitment, but also, simply, to face a degraded security environment no matter who is in the White House. I think this is within reach. The Europeans have already increased their defence expenditure quite significantly. We had only three allies at 2 percent [of GDP spending on defence] in 2014 at NATO. Now we have close to 20 this year. European allies have turned the corner on this. But it now needs to be sustained.”
Grand argues that there’s nonetheless plenty of room for NATO and the EU to cooperate extra intently. “There is institutional competition, which is absolutely not useful in today’s environment. Both organisations need to turn to each other and see what they can bring to the table and how they can support each other. It’s a good thing that the EU is more active, but the EU needs to work more closely with NATO. Both the EU and NATO need to be much more relaxed about how they work together.”
Programme ready by Sophie Samaille, Perrine Desplats and Paul Guianvarc’h
https://www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/talking-europe/20240329-eu-defence-reforms-won-t-immediately-help-ukraine-former-top-nato-official-camille-grand