Former head of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution: Maaßen is taking authorized motion in opposition to his outdated authority | EUROtoday

As of 4:44 p.m | Reading time: 2 minutes

Ex-Constitutional Protection Chief Hans-Georg Maaßen says he takes authorized motion in opposition to his former company. A lawsuit was filed with the Cologne Administrative Court in opposition to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution on Friday night, Maaßen defined on Saturday on the request of the German Press Agency. The “Nius” portal had beforehand reported on it. The Cologne Administrative Court couldn’t initially be reached on Saturday to substantiate receipt of the lawsuit.

At the tip of January it turned identified that the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) had saved information on its former president within the authority's data system within the space of ​​right-wing extremism. Maaßen accuses Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) of utilizing the home secret service “to observe government opponents,” as he advised the dpa. “Opponents of the government are not enemies of the constitution. In doing so, she is seriously violating her official duties and thereby damaging liberal democracy,” stated Maaßen. That's why he filed a lawsuit. Faeser is “unbearable” as Interior Minister and should be “immediately removed.”

additionally learn

According to Maaßen, the assertion of declare includes 40 pages and 165 pages of appendices – excerpts can be found to the dpa. This exhibits that Maaßen objects to the truth that “he was classified by the defendant/respondent as an object of observation or is currently being treated”. Accordingly, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution also needs to chorus from accumulating, evaluating, accumulating and storing data, private information, data, information and paperwork on measures.

The doc accuses the authority of unlawful and unconstitutional actions. “Apparently the BfV initially bases its assessment on the fact that a right-wing extremist mentioned the plaintiff/applicant in a letter; Another person is said to have shared videos of the plaintiff/applicant on Facebook (…),” the grievance states. The argument goes that such third-party actions are irrelevant below constitutional safety regulation. There isn’t any authorized foundation for observing or classifying Maaßen as a person.

Maaßen is federal chairman of the Values ​​Union occasion, which was based in mid-February and plans to run within the East German state elections within the fall.