Ayuso's boyfriend recordsdata a grievance towards the chief prosecutor of Madrid for alleged revelation of secrets and techniques | EUROtoday

Alberto Gonzlez Amador, accomplice of the regional president, Isabel Daz Ayuso, has filed a grievance with the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid (TSJM) towards the chief prosecutor of Madrid, Pilar Rodríguez Fernndezfor alleged revelation of secrets and techniques, authorized sources have identified to Europa Press and confirmed THE WORLD.

The grievance can be directed towards the financial crimes prosecutor Julin Salto in relation to the informative be aware broadcast by an official channel by which the Madrid Prosecutor's Office reported on the change of emails between González Amador's lawyer and the prosecutor associated to the investigation towards Ayuso's accomplice for alleged tax fraud.

The judicial doc has been offered to the Civil and Criminal Chamber of the TSJM, because the prosecutors have the standing of licensed individuals. The Chamber has already initiated some proceedings and can now be transferred to the Prosecutor's Office to rule on the admission of the grievance, because the aforementioned sources have detailed to Europa Press.

Regarding the identical matter, the Court of Instruction quantity 28 of Madrid has already opened proceedings in relation to the grievance offered by the Madrid Bar Association (ICAM) towards the Prosecutor's Office for the dissemination of the aforementioned assertion.

For its half, the Madrid president's accomplice known as to declare the subsequent May twentieth as being investigated for the alleged fee of two crimes of tax fraud and one crime of forgery in a business doc.

The investigation focuses on the alleged felony proof concerning information associated to the Corporate Tax akin to the years 2020 and 2021 and an alleged crime of falsification of a business doc as a consequence of invoices having been supplied that don’t correspond to companies really supplied and contributed with the aim of decreasing the tax quantity to be paid.

In the order opening proceedings, the choose reasoned that supposedly and “as a consequence of these fraudulent behaviors, the taxpayer has stopped paying into the state Treasury for the Corporation tax of 2020 a fee of 155,000 euros and for the 2021 corporate tax, a fee of 195,951 euros, crimes punishable in article 305.1 of the Penal Code in medial competition with a crime of forgery in a commercial document, of article 392.1 in relation to article 390 of the Penal Code”.

The Prosecutor's Office investigated the information following a report from the Tax company that warned of alleged tax fraud when “fictitious expenses based on invoices issued by various companies” had been detected throughout an investigation.

“Expenses that do not correspond to services actually provided and all of this with the purpose of entering into the public treasury less than the amount that corresponds to paying for the Corporate Income Tax for the 2020 and 2021 financial years,” states the prosecutor's grievance.