Glovo, Uber and Cabify don’t assure the minimal wage and don’t shield their staff from occupational dangers, in keeping with a research by the Complutense | Economy | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Glovo doesn’t assure that its staff earn a minimum of the minimal wage, a lot much less a good remuneration after bills, nor does it mitigate the dangers of labor, nor does it present a social security web, nor clear contractual circumstances, nor ample procedures for making choices. choices, nor an equitable administrative course of, nor does it guarantee the liberty of affiliation and expression of staff, nor does it promote democratic governance, nor does it keep away from abusive clauses. As it fails to adjust to these ten variables, the supply firm obtains a zero out of ten within the examination to which it was subjected by a bunch of researchers from the Complutense University of Madrid and which was launched this Thursday. It is the worst attainable grade. The evaluation additionally suspends the working circumstances of different giant platforms that function in Spain, equivalent to Uber and Cabify, which solely respect two of the ten variables analyzed. It portrays a bleak panorama concerning the working circumstances in these firms. Just Eat is the one giant platform that approves, with seven factors.

“There are platforms that comply and provide acceptable working conditions to their employees, such as Just Eat, and others that do not,” summarizes the principle co-investigator, Arturo Lahera, who shares the management of the mission with fellow Complutense professor Alberto Riesco. One of the strengths of the analysis is that it’s primarily based on an examination with world requirements, these imposed by the Fairwork mission. It is an thought promoted and coordinated by the Internet Institute of the University of Oxford, which consists of evaluating working circumstances on platforms by way of ten particular factors. Lahera and Riesco have carried out this train in Spain adopting the factors of the British college, supported by financing from the CC OO union. They have analyzed seven platforms, by way of interviews with the businesses and with workers: the supply platforms Just Eat, Glovo and La Pájara; transportation firms Cabify and Uber; the cleansing firm MyPoppins; and the transferring and meeting firm TaskRabbit.

The La Pájara cooperative obtains the most effective rating of the platforms analyzed, because it meets eight of the ten variables analyzed. It is extra applicable to say that it complied, because it closed in January, however was nonetheless open through the preparation of the research. It was a small participant within the sector, not like Just Eat, the opposite platform that stands out for its optimistic ranking. It meets seven of the ten Fairwork necessities, amongst which the fee of compensation in accordance with the minimal wage stands out. The research highlights that the wage tables come from an settlement with the unions, “which simultaneously implies both the recognition of the dependence and subordination of the delivery workers in an employment relationship, and the recognition of collective bargaining.” At the identical time, Lahera and Riesco specify that lots of this firm's supply drivers are employed part-time: “Just Eat guarantees salaries to its delivery staff above the minimum wage, but below what would be a sufficient living wage.” .

Just Eat has additionally applied an occupational threat prevention coverage, offers social safety protection to workers and offers them with clear contractual circumstances. Compliance with the regulation rider on the a part of Just Eat implies, says the research, “that its working and employment conditions, following Fairwork's evaluation criteria, are significantly more guaranteeing and protective than those of other platforms.” At the identical time, as the corporate itself often highlights, because of this they incur extra working prices than their opponents.

Glovo doesn’t meet a single one of many research's necessities to assign factors. Regarding remuneration, the evaluation considers that Glovo doesn’t even pay the minimal wage: “The evidence collected in our field work shows that the real income received by workers (between 3.4 euros and 5.3 euros net [por hora]) are below the minimum interprofessional salary (7.7 euros gross in 2022).” A key issue on this very low remuneration is that the corporate solely pays per order, it doesn’t cowl the intervals through which the supply particular person is ready, though with the laws in hand that is additionally working time.

In addition, the research additionally warns of flaws within the security of supply staff: “Glovo does not have an adequate occupational risk prevention policy for the majority of its delivery workers. The training received is limited and the platform is not responsible for the condition of the vehicles used in the delivery.”

Uber and Cabify, two out of ten

The different huge participant in meals supply in Spain is Uber Eats, however it’s not a part of the research. The authors didn’t need the prognosis to be restricted to supply, therefore they analyzed this group by its transportation exercise. And Uber doesn't comply there both. It solely will get a optimistic ranking concerning honest illustration of staff. It fails when it comes to remuneration, since, in keeping with researchers' estimates, an Uber driver has to work greater than 60 hours per week to acquire earnings “slightly above the minimum wage.” Nor does it adjust to the prevention of occupational dangers: “The salary remuneration system of a fixed part and a variable part promotes very long work days that reduce rest times and increase the risks of suffering an accident.” This intensification, the researchers diagnose, “also promotes risk-taking when driving, which increases the possibility of suffering an accident, as well as psychosocial risks.”

It is an evaluation much like the one which Lahera and Riesco make of the working circumstances at Cabify. Although these drivers are topic within the Community of Madrid to an settlement that established a base wage of 14,720 euros in 2022, barely above the SMI for that 12 months (14,000), there are components that dilute these earnings. “The remuneration system applied by the platform requires the worker to reach a minimum weekly billing threshold in order to receive their base salary. The problem we have detected is that the minimum billing required is very high and all the people interviewed claim to have to work long hours, about 12 hours a day,” the researchers level out. In interviews with these staff, they’ve additionally licensed that “some tasks that should be considered effective work time, such as refueling with gasoline or cleaning the vehicle, are not always paid, as are the times dedicated to attending to the company instructions or return the vehicle at the end of the shift.”

The research additionally addresses working circumstances on smaller platforms, the cleansing firm MyPoppins (which went bankrupt in April) and the meeting and transferring firm TaskRabbit, owned by Ikea. The first, like Glovo, fails to adjust to all of the variables analyzed, whereas the second obtains a meager two out of ten.

Negative conclusions

The researchers make a really detrimental prognosis of the overall panorama: “Despite the progress registered since the approval of the law rider, the working and employment conditions in the platform economy in Spain are still quite precarious, with quite modest labor standards.” They give for example the truth that Just Eat comes out so properly, when “it is limited, in reality, to applying current labor legislation, moving very little away from the minimum standards that are mandatory.” For this purpose, Lahera and Riesco take into account that “the room for improving labor protection in the platform economy is still large.” One of the traces they level out is that the protecting umbrella of the regulation rider should transcend supply and attain the remainder of the platforms, simply what is going to occur when the brand new just lately accredited European laws are transposed.

“Low wages; insufficient or excessive working hours; unpaid work time; insufficient protection against occupational risks; wide presence of false self-employment and subcontracting; unilateral changes in working conditions and presence of abusive clauses in the conditions of use contracts provided; precarious recognition of collective rights of representation and collective bargaining… Many of these problems persist even in those platforms and sectors where the salaried nature of the employment relationship is recognized and there is union representation,” they insist.

Follow all the data Economy y Business in Facebook y Xor in our publication semanal

Subscribe to proceed studying

Read with out limits

_


https://elpais.com/economia/2024-06-13/glovo-uber-y-cabify-no-garantizan-el-salario-minimo-y-no-protegen-a-sus-trabajadores-de-los-riesgos-laborales-segun-un-estudio-de-la-complutense.html