The Constitutional Court endorses that younger girls aged 16 and 17 can have an abortion with out parental consent | Society | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The Constitutional Court gave its approval this Tuesday to the reform of the abortion regulation, by which younger girls aged 16 and 17 can terminate pregnancies with out the necessity for parental consent. Public facilities are additionally set as reference facilities to hold them out.

Vox's attraction has been rejected by seven votes, these of the progressive majority of the Constitutional Court. Four magistrates have voted in opposition to, which represents the identical stability of forces with which the physique endorsed the deadline regulation accredited by the Government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero a yr in the past.

The 4 votes in opposition to belong to the judges from the conservative sector of the courtroom, Enrique Arnaldo, Concepción Espejel, Ricardo Enríquez and César Tolosa, who already voted in opposition to the ruling relating to the 2010 abortion regulation. In that case the discrepancy got here from , amongst different extremes, that stated magistrates thought-about that extra info needs to be given to girls who wished to have an abortion in regards to the alternate options they might consider.

Rajoy's reform

This second ruling on abortion consolidates the Constitutional doctrine in assist of the lady's free will to terminate being pregnant throughout the first 14 weeks. The first decision put an finish to the questioning of the 2010 regulation, appealed by the PP that very same yr. The Government of Mariano Rajoy, nonetheless, didn’t make any substantial modification to the regulation, besides to incorporate in 2015 obligatory parental depart within the occasion of termination of being pregnant by minors aged 16 and 17.

Vox, in flip, appealed in opposition to the modification of the abortion regulation accredited within the final legislature, alleging that it violated varied constitutional precepts and ideas, comparable to these of freedom, plurality and legality, in addition to the rights to equality and life. and ideological freedom. Among different facets, the Vox parliamentary group emphasised within the problem that within the case of voluntary termination of being pregnant, not solely the desire of the surrogate mom, but additionally that of her father, needed to be considered.

In this sense, the problem highlighted that each the present 2010 regulation and the brand new textual content, “with their alleged defense of women's freedom of decision, absolutely ignore the figure of the father, who is not recognized as having any intervention in the decision that may result in the death of your unborn child [sic]”. Vox added that the legislative initiative “perfectly reflects the destructive spirit of the basic moral principles that structure Western civilization” and “attacks the sacred nature of human life and the fundamental bond between the father and his son.”

Subscribe to proceed studying

Read with out limits