Fury in fairly UK seaside city as locals at struggle over wine bar plans | UK | News | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

A wine buff struggle has damaged out in a complicated city – dubbed the ‘Prosecco ghetto’.

The prosperous space of Well-next-the-Sea in Norfolk has been rocked by the full-bodied row after plans had been submitted to double its variety of wine bars.

The merlot-melee was sparked when Bert Blaize – nominated as Young Sommelier of the Year by the likes of GQ and Imbibe – lodged plans with the council to open a wine bar referred to as North Norfolk Cellars.

But amongst these to lodge a proper objection was Richard Turfrey, a rival wine vendor who runs Wells Wine Shop and Bar simply 250 metres away.

The pair went face to face after Richard wrote in his official objection that the “tranquil environment that has been enjoyed in this part of the town for hundreds of years will be lost.”

Councillors final week authorised the proposal when Richard withdrew his objections after his identification was made public on the council planning portal.

It has since been claimed the argument was ‘blown out of propotion’ and that Richard believed his identify wouldn’t be launched.

At the assembly on Tuesday of North Norfolk District Council, Bert mentioned he had obtained an apology – and claimed Richard had been attempting to drum up additional objections for worry of lack of commerce.

He informed councillors: “Richard, the gentleman who removed his objection, he actually came to see me.

“He’s the proprietor of the opposite wine bar in Wells and he admitted that he objected as a result of he thought that it will have an effect on his commerce and he additionally inspired others to object on his behalf, which is why a few the objections say ‘we have already got one wine bar in Wells, we don’t want a second’.

“He apologised to me and came to me face-to-face which is pretty respectful of him and then he phoned me later to say he removed his objection.”

Mr Blaize, 35, who has written a e-book referred to as Which Wine When, obtained a complete of eight objections round noise, extreme booze, and shutting instances.

Among them was the one from Mr Turfrey — who didn’t disclose a connection to his bar, however wrote: “Having lived within the east finish of Wells for the final eight years I’ve grown to grasp the importance of this tranquil atmosphere throughout the city and the significance of its preservation for future generations to return.

“All drinking establishments are unavoidably noisy and therefore the addition of a licensed premises will change the above mentioned environment forever and this is an absolute fact that can not be denied.

“A different type of human traffic with a different requirement will be visiting this area for the first time as a result of the premises license and this will irrevocably change this historic environment in a detrimental way forever after being protected for so long.

“There is no doubt that the permanent residents that are living directly opposite and within a stones throw will be unavoidably effected by the inevitable noise and comings and goings of a licensed premises in an environment that has never been accustomed to one; their quiet enjoyment will be lost forever and the tranquil environment that has been enjoyed in this part of the town for hundreds of years will be lost.”

Another objector did mention his wine bar however, stating: “In conclusion we should point out that there is already a wine bar in Wells- the Wells Wine Bar in Staithe Street.

“We don’t see the need for another one.”

Speaking after the assembly, Mr Blaize mentioned he now held no ill-will in direction of his wine rival.

He added: “I want Richard all the very best and I feel this has all been vastly blown out of proportion actually.”