Can chemistry make us blissful someday or is it a matter of religion? | The stone axe | Science | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The shepherd who utilized mould to the wound is not any completely different from Alexander Fleming in his observe. What is completely different is that Fleming adopted the scientific methodology to show that making use of mould to the wound labored. In this manner, the scientific methodology serves as a differentiating attribute between two options that, at first look, appear to be one and the identical.

Antonio Escohotado tells us one thing comparable in considered one of his items which have simply been compiled by Guillermo Herranz for Página Indómita with a Jungerian and vital title: Facing concern (Volume II). For some cause the e-book opens with a quote from Jünger that may be a declaration of intent. Because, following the German thinker's instance, well being for Escohotado resides in those that have no idea concern. In accordance with this, we discover a tendency to deal with sickness as a psychosomatic dysfunction in every of his scientific approaches, that’s, for Escohotado, illnesses and sicknesses have an emotional origin.

Without going any additional, when Antonio Escohotado addresses the topic of tranquilizers and antidepressants, he does so from a essential perspective, stating that, with chemical remedy, sufferers are held in an invisible straitjacket, making his personal the qualification of Dr. Henri Laborit (1914-1995) when he mentioned that tranquilizers had been a “pharmacological lobotomy.” For those that have no idea, H. Laborit was the primary to make use of GHB for therapeutic functions within the Nineteen Sixties. Much earlier, throughout World War II, Laborit used an antipsychotic —chlorpromazine— for surgical functions, since this sedative reduces irritation and calms the affected person earlier than surgical procedure. Chlorpromazine is an antihistamine that, when it takes impact on the affected person, he doesn’t lose consciousness; observing the element, experiments with this substance started in psychiatry, inflicting what is named the “Fourth revolution in Psychiatry.”

We should not neglect that Antonio Escohotado was, above all, a thinker, an individual skilled within the artwork of decoding ideas. That is why he left us a legacy of details about the completely different substances that trigger alterations in consciousness and he did so from the pharmakon, an idea from classical Greece that may be a poison and a treatment on the similar time, the dose being what makes the idea swing to at least one facet or the opposite. However, Escohotado dissects chemical therapies in his article, because the chemical treatment attenuates the consequences of melancholy or nervous agitation, however doesn’t get to the foundation of the matter, that’s, to the trigger.

Continuing along with his essential background, Escohotado gives us one other article entitled Epidemic factoriesthe place he offers his perspective on HIV as a social stigma for many who contract the virus. Its presence “is equivalent to a death sentence that steals the future and, for that reason, the present,” says Escohotado, happening to level out that the analysis of this illness is advanced, as a consequence of its lengthy incubation interval.

We might discover his scientific articles controversial, we might agree with some and disagree with many others, however there isn’t a doubt that Escohotado, when expressing his information and opinions, doesn’t ignore the rational procedures utilized by the scientific methodology. That is what makes him the black sheep of the flock.

The stone axe It is a bit the place Montero Glezwith a will to prose, workouts its explicit siege on scientific actuality to show that science and artwork are complementary types of information.

You can comply with MATERIA in Facebook, X e Instagramor enroll right here to obtain our weekly e-newsletter.

Subscribe to proceed studying

Read with out limits