Martin Baron: “A Trump presidency would put American democracy in check” | USA Elections | EUROtoday
The journalistic world of the United States was blown up this Friday when it grew to become recognized that The Washington Post wouldn’t help any presidential candidate for the primary time for the reason that Eighties. Media endorsement of a candidate, generally known as endorsement in English, it is not uncommon observe within the United States. The resolution to not publish the editorial supporting Democrat Kamala Harris got here when it was already written. It was the proprietor of the historic newspaper – and second richest man on this planet – Jeff Bezos, who stopped the publication with the argument that the newspaper is not going to help any candidate now or sooner or later. Since then, criticism of the choice has multiplied: each within the editorial workplace and by headline legends corresponding to Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who uncovered the Watergate scandal, one of many nice investigations in historical past. of journalism. One of the primary to react harshly towards Bezos’s resolution was Martin Baron (Tampa, Florida, 70 years previous), director of the Post through the first Trump Administration and when Bezos took management of the newspaper.
At the time of the dialog with EL PAÍS, on Friday morning, the choice of The Washington Post, however Baron, retired since he left the top in January 2021, already identified that the announcement of Los Angeles Times Not supporting any candidate was an indication of journalism’s weak spot within the face of the potential of the previous president returning to the White House after the November 5 elections. Once the video name is over, he sends his opinion by electronic mail in regards to the resolution of the newspaper he directed.
Ask. What did you suppose that The Washington Post not going to help any of the candidates?
Answer. It is cowardice, a second of darkness with democracy as a sufferer. Donald Trump will see this as an invite to additional intimidate his proprietor, Jeff Bezos, and different media homeowners. Disturbing cowardice in an establishment well-known for its bravery.
P. Eight years after Trump’s first victory and going through a potential new victory, do you suppose journalism within the United States goes by a very good or unhealthy second?
R. There is proof of weak spot, of concern amongst some sectors of the press, and others that point out that the media has completed a very good job: they’ve investigated Trump’s workforce, the way in which he needs to implement his proposals. There are few voters who have no idea the character, character, or plans of the 2 candidates. Everything has been informed. It’s wonderful, as a result of there are a variety of critics who say we’ve not completed our job effectively sufficient. However, most of what we all know is as a result of it was printed, specifically, in two media: The Washington Post y The New York Times. His achievements have to be acknowledged, although there are lots of critics, primarily on the left, who will blame the standard press if Trump wins.
The downside is that we can’t agree on how you can decide the details, as a result of all the weather we use have been devalued: schooling, expertise, information and, above all, proof. It shouldn’t be solely an issue of the press, however of society. How are we going to progress as a society if we can’t agree on how you can decide a reality? Only 8% of adults within the United States contemplate The New York Times as one in all your principal sources of data; 3% within the case of The Washington Post. Less than 10% of readers of the Times They are thought of conservative. The fact is that Trump’s followers aren’t getting their data by these media. They do it by Fox News, above all, and thru the networks, Truth Social or Twitter. [actualmente X]. The proprietor of Twitter [Elon Musk] He has been supporting Trump, giving him $45 million a month and selling his marketing campaign daily and virtually all day. He represents the primary distributor of faux information all around the world. He is at all times spreading baseless conspiracy theories.
P. How do you suppose Elon Musk has influenced this marketing campaign?
R. I believe it has had a variety of influence, it has been efficient for Trump. He has 200 million followers on Twitter, all customers obtain his posts. There isn’t any different human being who can convey his opinion to so many individuals. Not solely has he had a big effect, however he’ll play a fairly necessary position within the Trump Administration if he wins the election.
P. What distinction do you see between the protection of this election and former ones?
R. When Trump ran for president in 2015, he was a candidate in contrast to any we had seen earlier than. We weren’t used to somebody who criticized the press on a regular basis, who threatened to indict his supposed political enemies and, above all, somebody who was mendacity on a regular basis, deceiving individuals. At that point we had been reluctant to talk so frankly, as a result of we weren’t used to it. I believe every part has modified, as a result of it’s apparent that Trump continues to lie, he is aware of that he’s not telling the reality and that he says some issues to realize political benefit. Trump is attempting to create an setting wherein voters have no idea how you can distinguish between fact and lies, and he’ll proceed to attempt to undermine the credibility of the press if he returns to the White House.
P. What has the media not recognized how you can do then?
R. It’s an advanced subject. The media’s approval ranking had dropped earlier than Trump’s arrival in politics. And it accelerated throughout his Administration, primarily resulting from his incessant criticism of the press. There are many individuals who suppose that he’s their voice, that the elites haven’t completed sufficient for them, they haven’t paid consideration to their issues, to their expectations. They are nervous in regards to the excessive price of inflation, which impacts everybody, or about excessive gas costs; There are additionally many individuals who suppose that the United States is spending an excessive amount of cash on the conflict in Ukraine. They suppose Trump understands their lives higher. And, as in different nations, within the United States there may be an alarming decline in help for democracy. And sure, I believe we’ve to do self-criticism too. We made the error, earlier than Trump ran for president, of not understanding the political setting within the nation effectively sufficient. We did not perceive the issues of a big portion of the American individuals. We didn’t perceive that they held a lot resentment and grievance towards the standard media. We don’t anticipate a candidate like Donald Trump. I believe we’ve to suppose deeply about that failure. We have an obligation to cowl all individuals, perceive their struggles. Also in some corners of the standard media there may be an excessive amount of activism on the a part of journalists, and it’s important that we keep away from contempt or being condescending to individuals.
P. In the face of what looks as if fixed adverse protection of Trump for his conduct, how do you suppose you possibly can keep away from false stability with Harris and being unfairly adverse about her?
R. Voters have the appropriate to know the insurance policies of the 2 candidates, to know their historical past. No candidate ought to run for president with out ready for an evaluation, an investigation of his efficiency. All politicians have to be held accountable. Sebastian Junger, the journalist who wrote The excellent storm He stated {that a} true journalist should sacrifice his personal opinions for the details. We have an obligation to unearth the details, whatever the candidate and no matter our political preferences. We should keep our independence and be trustworthy to the core values of our career. We should not be allies of a celebration, however of the reality, of the details. And we’ve the duty, clearly, to place them in context. It is as much as the individuals to make the choice about the way forward for the nation. The press doesn’t have management over the way forward for the nation. We have an obligation to present the general public the data they want and need to know. However, there’s a large distinction between the 2 candidates. There is a candidate who believes within the democratic system and one other who has drawn political traces of an autocratic nature; there is no such thing as a doubt that he’s a would-be autocrat. He admires dictators from different nations, like Orbán, Erdogan, Putin.
P. How shut can the United States be to dropping its democracy if Trump wins the presidency once more?
R. There is a superb hazard as a result of we’ve to consider what Trump has already completed. He incited an insurrectionary mob on January 6, 2021. They stormed the Capitol, an emblem of democracy within the United States, to overturn the election outcomes. And what did Trump do? Nothing, except inciting his followers. A brand new presidency may put American democracy in test.
P. How to regain belief in journalism with leaders who don’t wish to know something in regards to the details?
R. It is an issue that isn’t going to be solved within the quick time period. We need to cowl all individuals actually, impartially and independently. We ought to by no means have contempt for anybody, nor condescension. Regardless of their political positions. We want a coverage of radical transparency in our work. That is to say, once we consult with a judicial doc, we must always give that doc to the general public in order that they will see that we’re not taking it out of context. The identical with a video, with an audio, or the origin of the information. We have to indicate readers that they’ve the appropriate and alternative to take a look at our work. We have to indicate, not simply inform.
https://elpais.com/internacional/elecciones-usa/2024-10-26/martin-baron-una-presidencia-de-trump-pondria-en-jaque-a-la-democracia-de-estados-unidos.html