Rita Maestre, about Errejón: “How was I going to cover up as politics what I didn’t know as a couple?” | Spain | EUROtoday

On October 28, Rita Maestre appeared at a press convention with a critical face to elucidate the response of her celebration, Más Madrid, after the resignation of Íñigo Errejón on account of nameless complaints on an Instagram profile for alleged humiliating sexual habits. This Sunday, the Madrid councilor was as soon as once more in entrance of the cameras, on this case in an interview on this system Saved of La Sexta. “How was I going to cover up as politics what I didn’t know as a couple?” Maestre defended herself, guaranteeing that neither she nor anybody in her celebration was conscious of the sexist attitudes in the direction of different girls of her boyfriend roughly a decade in the past.

Errejón, co-founder of Podemos in 2014 and since final February parliamentary spokesperson for de Sumar, all of the sudden left politics two weeks in the past by means of a letter wherein he mentioned that he had reached “the limit of the contradiction between the character and the person.” . Maestre considers that assertion “an insult to intelligence and an indecent mix of victimhood, throwing balls out of bounds and not asking for forgiveness.”

Days earlier than the resignation, an nameless criticism on the Instagram profile of journalist Cristina Fallarás not directly identified the politician, a reference on the Spanish left because the delivery of Podemos. Later there have been different nameless accounts of “psychological violence, abuse and humiliation,” Maestre says. And a criticism on the police station from the presenter and actress Elisa Mouliaá. Two of the 5 nameless episodes occurred throughout the courtship between Maestre and Errejón. “I’m still digesting it,” he says. The one who was Errejón’s girlfriend ten years in the past and a fellow activist within the house on the left of the PSOE then determined to jot down a letter that she made public. “I wrote it in one go, it didn’t cost me anything. It came out very naturally and with a lot of anger,” Maestre confesses within the interview.

In the dialog, which lasted nearly an hour, Maestre says she feels indignant, upset, considerably responsible – “How is it possible that you didn’t realize this?” [los comportamientos de Errejón] earlier than?, she asks herself. But above all he feels anger. “One day I get up and browse a sworn statement wherein a girl says that she had a relationship when Íñigo Errejón was my companion. And that she has felt unhealthy, humiliated, and many others. And then I notice that later Errejón got here dwelling with me and that has a whole lot of impression. I shouldn’t have a rivalry with that lady, however quite a contempt for that man. That’s why I write the letter.”

A judge has summoned Errejón next Tuesday to testify as a defendant as a result of Elisa Mouliaá’s complaint. “The role is not mine. The victims are the women who have suffered situations of mistreatment, harassment or abuse,” Maestre emphasizes. “I feel cheated, personally and politically,” she continues and explains that from now on she will have to relocate the chapter of her life with Errejón to another place in her memory. “Everything that has happened forces us to relocate and relocate the past in a different way. And I have to do it in private but also in public because the only way to heal is to talk.”

When the scandal was uncovered, many voices, especially on the left, said that Errejón’s behavior with women was an open secret. With a huge face of stupor and surprise, Rita Maestre defends herself and assures that neither she “nor Manuela [Bergerot]by Monica [García]nor any other person” from Más Madrid knew that Íñigo Errejón was “a misogynist, a predator and a pathological manipulator.” Furthermore, he defines the management of this crisis as “impeccable” by both Sumar and Más Madrid. “We have been quick and very forceful and frank with the press and in assuming that there is much to rethink to ensure that this does not happen again.” And she responds with a categorical “no” to the question of whether she is worried about Errejón’s emotional or psychological situation. “Right now, the level of anger and disappointment does not allow me to have empathy,” he concludes. Asked how she feels seeing the end of Errejón’s political career, she states: “What I feel is that we didn’t know all this before. Because I don’t believe that any contribution to politics is worth as much as the parallel damage it has created.”