Trump’s Win Is Historic – If ‘History’ Is Defined As Starting With Trump’s 2016 Election | EUROtoday

WASHINGTON — Weeks after Donald Trump’s victory to regain the White House, he and his allies proceed to name his election “massive” and “historic” and a “landslide” — which is simply true if historical past consists of solely these elections that contain Donald Trump.

“We’ve made history,” Trump mentioned in his election evening speech in Florida, claiming he had been given a “mandate” by voters. “It’s a political victory that our country has never seen before, nothing like this.”

Every week later, in a dialog with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, Trump mentioned: “Amazing what happened, we had tremendous success. The most successful in over 100 years, they say.”

Trump’s workers and allies have stored up the drumbeat of boasts.

“President Trump won in dominating and historic fashion,” spokesperson Steven Cheung advised The New York Times.

Karoline Leavitt, a marketing campaign spokesperson who will probably be White House press secretary when Trump retakes workplace, referred to as the win “massive and historic” in a social media put up final week.

Those superlatives, although, are solely correct if the dataset consists of simply the final three elections.

In reality, Trump virtually actually won’t exceed 50 p.c of the full vote by the point the election is licensed subsequent month, that means a majority of Americans who forged ballots may have voted for another person. His 1.6-percentage-point margin over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris would be the smallest of any standard vote winner since Richard Nixon’s 0.7 p.c win over Hubert Humphrey in 1968.

Further, his Electoral College margin will probably be smaller than each of Democrat Barack Obama’s wins and each of Democrat Bill Clinton’s victories.

Indeed, the one true historic achievement Trump can declare is that America had beforehand elected neither a convicted felon nor somebody who had earlier tried a coup to stay in energy, and now has performed each in the identical individual.

Leavitt, responding to HuffPost’s question asking what made Trump’s win this month historic, mentioned that Trump had gained the favored vote; had obtained extra votes than any earlier Republican candidate; had obtained extra electoral votes than any Republican going again 9 elections; had gained all seven “battleground” states, and had obtained “record” help amongst Latino voters.

“Need I continue,” she requested — however then didn’t reply to follow-up questions apart from to insult HuffPost.

But Leavitt’s record of “historic” feats is extra of an outline of his efficiency in comparison with latest Republican candidates than any historic normal. For instance, that Trump gained the favored vote is unremarkable — the overwhelming majority of presidents have performed this.

That he gained extra uncooked votes than earlier Republican presidents is unsurprising given how a lot the nation’s inhabitants has grown in latest many years. Ronald Reagan gained 59% of the votes forged in 1984, whereas Richard Nixon gained 61% in 1972, however did so with 54 million and 47 million votes, respectively, in comparison with Trump’s 77 million.

And whereas Trump’s share of Latino voters could barely exceed that gained by George W. Bush in his 2004 reelection, it’s smaller than that gained by each Democratic candidate going again many years.

It is unclear what the purpose of mendacity about Trump’s victory margin is.

“He’s the king of hyperbole,” mentioned one Republican National Committee member who spoke on situation of anonymity. “Who knows what the point may be.”

One longtime GOP marketing consultant, who additionally spoke on situation of anonymity, steered it may be to assist get his Cabinet appointments by way of. “To enforce discipline on the GOP Senate to approve his nominees,” he mentioned.

Trump, after all, has by no means been shy about exaggerating his accomplishments. After 2016, he took to calling that victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton “historic” regardless that he obtained practically 3 million fewer votes than she did. In nearly each speech, whatever the event, he would recount that election evening as the tv networks referred to as state after state for Trump. He even started claiming that no Republican had gained Wisconsin since Dwight Eisenhower in 1956 till he did — which was true provided that you disregard Nixon in 1960, 1968 and 1972 and Reagan in 1980 and 1984.

After his 2017 inauguration images confirmed he attracted lower than half the gang that Obama did in 2008, Trump nonetheless claimed at a speech at CIA headquarters the next day that there had been 2 million individuals in attendance, and later that day ordered his press secretary to exit to the White House briefing room and repeat these false claims to the media.

The marketing consultant mentioned Trump’s willingness to lie repeatedly about his achievements, whereas not efficient with everybody, completely turns into actuality for his followers. “When he does these things, he essentially creates his own weather,” he mentioned. “Most of his supporters know nothing of history. They take what he says at face value and echo that sentiment across every platform.”