Dinesh D’Souza Says ‘2000 Mules’ Conspiracy Film Relied On ‘Inaccurate’ Data | EUROtoday

Dinesh D’Souza — the conservative filmmaker behind the extensively debunked conspiracy movie “2000 Mules” — apologized to a Georgia man accused of poll fraud through the 2020 election and admitted the documentary relied on “inaccurate information.”

The movie, launched in 2022, turned a rallying cry for a lot of conservatives for years, who claimed, with out proof, that the 2020 race was stolen from Donald Trump. Trump himself praised the movie, which pointed to cellphone location information filmmakers stated instructed poll “mules” had been paid to illegally accumulate and drop off ballots in key swing states that voted for Joe Biden throughout that race.

Experts and election official from each events shortly debunked these claims, however D’Souza vehemently defended his work for years. But he issued a mea culpa over the weekend saying he had not too long ago discovered the cellphone proof didn’t assist the “mule” principle.

“We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data,” D’Souza stated.

“I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters … ” he went on. “While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology.”

D’Souza stated if he had identified the true nature of the cellphone geolocation information, “I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently.”

“We operated in good faith and in reliance on True the Vote,” he stated. “We continue to have confidence in their work and also in the basic message of ‘2000 Mules.’”

Andrews, along with his face blurred out, is seen within the movie as he locations ballots in a drop field in Georgia. A voiceover by D’Souza says the person is committing a criminal offense, claiming he was depositing “fraudulent votes.”

The New York Times notes the state investigated that declare and located Andrews had legally solid ballots for himself and his household on the similar deal with.

The man filed a lawsuit towards D’Souza in 2022, which is ongoing. The case claims D’Souza and others named within the swimsuit “knew that their portrayals of Mr. Andrews were lies, as was the entire narrative of ’2000 Mules.’”

“But they have continued to peddle these lies in order to enrich themselves,” attorneys for Andrews wrote, per The Associated Press. The case additionally notes that video used to advertise the movie contains unblurred photographs of Andrews and the license plate on his automobile.

True the Vote, a nonprofit that equipped the cellphone geolocation information, can also be named within the swimsuit. The group stated Monday the details of the movie stay “accurate,” however stated it had no editorial management over the the documentary’s message.

D’Souza stated in his assertion this month his apology was not associated to a settlement or underneath any “duress … but because it is the right thing to do, given what we have now learned.”

“While I do not believe Mr. Andrews was ever identified by the film or book, I am sorry for any harm he believes he and his family has suffered as a result of ‘2000 Mules,’” D’Souza stated.