Glovo supply drivers, confronted with their regularization: “Before I rented the account, now I don’t know what that will be like” | Economy | EUROtoday
At the tip of 2018, when the battle between Glovo’s labor mannequin and the courts started, the corporate’s CEO and co-founder, Òscar Pierre, admitted that “it would be a chore” in the event that they had been compelled to rent all their supply drivers. Six years later—and after dozens of rulings, the Supreme Court’s ruling and the approval of the Rider legislationwhich Glovo has been avoiding for 3 years—the corporate lastly introduced this Monday, someday earlier than Pierre declares himself below investigation in a legal trial, that it’s abandoning its mannequin, based mostly on false freelancers, and that it’ll rent its employees. Now, along with the duty that the corporate could should regularize its staff, it’s the supply drivers themselves who really see it as a activity.
What needs to be excellent news – regularization implies job safety, improved contributions and enhancements in threat prevention, amongst different issues – is obtained by many with nice skepticism, if not outright rejection. “It’s very bad because if the majority of us are already self-employed, it should continue like this: we were used to working like this,” claims Javier Rojas, a Venezuelan who delivers with a yellow backpack round Madrid. But Rojas, like many others, will not be actually self-employed and doesn’t work at Glovo below his identify: he rents out the account of a 3rd get together, to whom he pays 25% of what he invoices. “Now I don’t know what that will be like,” he admits.
Workers and unions doubt the true scope of Glovo’s promise: there’s nervousness on the road as a result of it’s not clear how many individuals can be employed, of the 15,000 supply staff that Glovo says it has lively in Spain. It can also be not recognized what the wage can be within the new labor mannequin: “If they hire, it will be a minimum wage, and we can make more than a minimum wage,” says Ronald Roa, additionally from Venezuela. Finally, it appears clear to everybody that within the new mannequin they will be unable to have the flexibleness that they’ve had till now, nor perform the practices that – with out being regulated – permit them to earn extra money and work even when they don’t have papers.
“This is the reality of any informal job: what a model like this gives is the possibility of survival, especially for migrants who the State does not consider legal because they do not have papers. It is understandable that even though it is through exploitation, they want a model that allows them to survive,” says Núria Soto, spokesperson for the Riders x Rights union, the platform that began the battle for the regularization of supply drivers eight years in the past, when Glovo started to work along with different supply purposes. “But what do we have to do, maintain a company that exploits people so that they don’t starve? No, what we have to do is think of solutions for these people, which have also generated benefits for the company,” he factors out.
Sub-renting an account, or passing the account amongst a number of staff to have the ability to work extra hours than initially allowed, is a really widespread apply amongst Glovo supply staff. That is why the variety of supply folks offered by the corporate will be a lot greater, since there isn’t a solution to management how many individuals work with the identical account.
Ángel Jiménez, not too long ago arrived from Venezuela, has been paying 30% of his revenue to the self-employed one that rents the account for a month and a half. “They told me that this way you earn more,” he explains. He fears that regularization might jeopardize the job he has labored so arduous to seek out. The identical factor occurs to Colombian Carlos Luque, who discovered the proprietor of the account because of phrase of mouth. “An acquaintance told me about this opportunity,” he says. “It’s difficult for someone who isn’t used to riding a bicycle all day, but I didn’t find a job doing anything else,” he laments. In the few weeks he has been within the capital he tried to work in pastry retailers, bakeries and as a contractor. “You can’t choose, it’s what you have to do.”
The uncertainty over revenue will not be minor both. What a supply driver earns now is dependent upon the hours he places in, the orders he is ready to ship on this time and the supply he reveals, one thing that rewards the algorithm to have entry to extra orders. “I know people who earn up to 1,600 euros a month; “We get between 1,100 and 1,200,” details Jesús Zambrano, another rider from Madrid, who has also been dealing with the repair of his scooter, for which he must pay around 500 euros. “If they put this new thing in, my expenses will go out of balance,” he laments. He can also be involved that to any extent further they will be unable to have further funds, referred to as “challenges” in Glovo, which they obtain relying on their efficiency. “They stimulate the worker, depending on the orders delivered: for 12 in three hours you can get 15 euros,” provides Zambrano.
Distrust
Regarding flexibility, Roa fears that as a contract worker they can not reject orders or take a break day. “Hired, you have to or yes you have to make the orders. It’s raining, for example, there are some who don’t like it or who can’t work. Here we all work like this, because there is more demand and more profit, but it is our own decision. When you are hired, you cannot refuse,” he says. “Or they are going to send you an order of almost five kilometers and you have to do it no matter what,” provides Zambrano, who, nevertheless, acknowledges that “paid vacations can be an advantage” of being a salaried worker. “I have a cousin who was at Just Eat in the summer, he worked well and they gave him vacations,” he remembers. Just Eat, however, does adjust to the legislation when hiring its supply drivers and has sued Glovo for unfair competitors.
What for some is a means of survival, for others is the lure of precariousness. “I prefer to be hired, because this means being enslaved and hooked on your cell phone so that orders come in,” explains one other supply driver in Barcelona, who prefers to not give his identify.
However, the unions mistrust the corporate’s promise. “We don’t want to celebrate anything until they hire the last delivery driver and until they recognize all the years of work,” says Soto. “We are concerned about the number of undocumented workers there are and how many are going to be left without work,” provides Franz Morales, from CC OO, who requires “caution” concerning regularization. Both additionally categorical their doubts about the truth that Glovo has introduced this promise someday earlier than Pierre’s assertion in courtroom: “It is a measure to protect himself,” Morales closes.
The promise has taken unexpectedly even the supply drivers’ associations that defend the self-employed mannequin, and which have all the time been positioned within the firm’s orbit. “More than with the corporate, we’re upset with the context, the unions and the Government. It appears surreal to me that Pierre has to testify in legal proceedings, that it has to return this far for the Government to impose its legislation,” says Gustavo Gaviria, spokesperson for Repartdores Unidos, who affirms that he was not aware of the regularization announcement: “Clearly It doesn’t adapt to the overwhelming majority of supply drivers’ pursuits. And, however, we’ve the precedent left by Deliveroo, Stuart, Gorillas… which is that this sector is unviable with staff.” This query, how Glovo, a loss-making firm that belongs to the German big Delivery Hero, will be viable within the new mannequin, can also be one other activity.
https://elpais.com/economia/2024-12-03/los-repartidores-de-glovo-ante-su-regularizacion-antes-realquilaba-la-cuenta-ahora-no-se-como-sera-eso.html