POLL: Do you assume Labour hates pensioners? Vote right here | Politics | News | EUROtoday

Pensioners are the folks on this nation who’ve labored all their lives placing cash into the nationwide coffers and serving to construct the Britain we dwell in at present.

But as one other blow is introduced for aged folks from the Government at present, with the information that so-called WASPI ladies affected by modifications to the state pension age is not going to obtain compensation, it looks like Labour do not just like the older technology that a lot.

Evidence it could possibly be argued has been clear inside the first 5 months of Sir Keir Starmer’s time in workplace, throughout which period winter gasoline funds have been axed and aged farmers have been hit with inheritance tax which means they can not go on the land they’ve labored on all their lives.

A society is commonly judged by the way it treats its most susceptible so right here at Express.co.uk we dare to ask the query ‘Do you assume Labour Hates Pensioners?’, take our new POLL beneath.

Women affected by modifications to the state pension age is not going to obtain compensation, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has introduced.

Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) have advocated for assist for girls who had been born within the Nineteen Fifties and say they didn’t get enough warnings about modifications to the state pension.

“The Government does not believe paying a flat rate to all women at a cost of up to £10.5 billion would be fair or proportionate to taxpayers,” Ms Kendall instructed the Commons.

But the choice has sparked anger from WASPI who’ve referred to as the transfer “bizarre”.

Angela Madden, chairwoman of Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) mentioned: “The Government has today made an unprecedented political choice to ignore the clear recommendations of an independent watchdog which ordered ministers urgently to compensate waspi women nine months ago.

“This is a weird and completely unjustified transfer which is able to go away everybody asking what the purpose of an ombudsman is that if ministers can merely ignore their selections. It appears like a choice that may make the likes of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump blush.

“The idea that an ‘action plan’ to avoid such mistakes in future should be the result of a six-year ombudsman’s investigation is an insult both to the women and to the PHSO process.

“An overwhelming majority of MPs again waspi’s requires honest compensation and all choices stay on the desk. Parliament should now search an alternate mechanism to pressure this difficulty on to the order paper so justice will be accomplished.”