The PSOE and the PP rejoice the protection of consensus and “serenity” made by Felipe VI and keep away from taking themselves with no consideration | Spain | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The two major events in Spain, the PSOE and the PP, have agreed this Wednesday, as yearly, of their applause for the Christmas speech given the day earlier than by the King, though neither of them wished to imagine their share of the blame for what Felipe VI described the general public debate as a “thunderous” contest. The head of state urged the events and administrations to place apart the anger, pursue “consensus”, defend the “common good” and foster a “high-level” dialogue to face the good issues and challenges of the Spanish individuals. Socialists and fashionable individuals have caught to the literal protection of these phrases, with out anticipating any future adjustments of their habits.

“Philip VI understands that political life must be marked by serenity. We cannot agree more,” the PSOE has written on its official X account. “Consensus should be the way in which to dedicate all our efforts to the well-being of the residents of Spain. And to these affected by dana: you’ll by no means be alone. The State shall be there so long as it’s wanted,” adds the message, alluding to another of the central elements of the King’s speech: the demand for the “widespread good” and the duty of public administrations to devote their resources to major crises. .

The president of the PP and chief of the opposition, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, has ignored Felipe VI’s appeals to the events to cut back the decibels within the political debate and has targeted on applauding the popularity proven by the King “to the solidarity of the Spanish people, their demand for the common good as a guiding principle in politics, and their defense of the Constitution.” “The parliamentary monarchy closes another exemplary year at the service of the Spanish people. And at his side,” he wrote on social networks.

The number two of the PP, Cuca Gamarra, has spoken along the same lines: “A correct vindication of the common good by the Head of State. And in the face of the denial of the shared space that generations of Spaniards have built with so much effort, serenity and institutional trust to guarantee it.” The president of the Valencian Generalitat, Carlos Mazón (PP), thanked the King for “his memory, closeness and affection for Valencia” for the words dedicated by the head of state to the province. “A speech that once again demonstrates his stature and humanity,” he noted.

Much extra essential has been the response from Sumar, the occasion that governs Spain along with the PSOE and which has described the speech as “disappointing and right-wing.” “DANA was not a problem of coordination between administrations, but of climate denialism and political negligence. Pointing out migration as a problem is serious. Not mentioning sexist violence or sexual assaults is even more so,” Yolanda Díaz’s platform on the social community X has listed. And she provides: “Not a mention of the Palestinian genocide or the war in Ukraine. Not even the climate crisis. A speech locked in a paradigm, that of ’78, that no longer says anything to almost anyone. Even less to younger people.”

The Communication Secretary of Movimiento Sumar, Elizabeth Duval, later elaborated on that concept. “The background music [del discurso del Rey] “It sounds good, the ideas of common good, dialogue or responsibility, but the lyrics, in reality, are much less friendly,” he mentioned, in a message despatched to the media.

The president of Junts per Catalunya, Jordi Turull, has mentioned that he didn’t see or hear the King’s Christmas message as a result of he believes that what the top of state says is “absolutely irrelevant and lacks credibility” so long as he doesn’t start by “apologizing for what he did on October 3rd and from October 3rd [de 2017]”, in reference to the looks of Felipe VI two days after the unlawful independence referendum was held in Catalonia, when he demanded the restoration of constitutional order.

Turull has additionally attacked the “executioners in toga” and the “delusional gravediggers” who keep – because the PSC has carried out this week – that Catalonia “has turned the page” on the course of independence. “No one here will be able to turn the page” till Catalonia reaches its “fullness,” he mentioned through the conventional floral providing on the tomb of the previous president of the Republican Generalitat Francesc Macià within the Montjuïc Cemetery.

Another voice of the Catalan independence motion essential of the King has been that of the president of ERC, Oriol Junqueras, who has said, additionally in Montjuïc, that the monarch “is not authorized in any case to ask others to make less noise when he has contributed more than anyone” to it. “On October 3, 2017, I applauded the beatings that the police had given to the 1-O voters,” he mentioned. Like Turull, Junqueras has claimed to not have listened to Felipe VI’s speech.

The PNV spokesperson in Congress, Aitor Esteban, has criticized the “idyllic” imaginative and prescient that the King has of the Constitution and has regretted that he’s not making an attempt to make the monarchy “useful” throughout his reign. “It is a continuation of his father,” he mentioned. The PNV believes that the monarch might have tried to “accommodate the different national sentiments” current in Spain, “but he did not have the will.” Yes, Esteban has supported Felipe VI’s protection of liberal democracy and the European Union. And he has assured that the PNV doesn’t really feel challenged when the top of state calls for serenity within the face of the “thunderous political anger.” “We work from responsibility to improve the lives of Basque citizens,” he concluded.

Podemos: the King, “representative of the extreme right”

Ione Belarra, normal secretary of Podemos, already expressed on Tuesday evening her “laziness” within the face of Felipe VI’s speeches. “Anyone else here wishing that the end of the year speeches would be given once and for all by the President of the Republic? “This king is no longer anything more than the depressing project of the Spanish right,” he wrote in to his father and predecessor, Juan Carlos I, as “corrupt.”

Along the identical traces as its normal secretary, Podemos has described the top of state because the “maximum representative of the extreme right”, contemplating that, from his name for consensus – which Podemos sees as an try to make sure that “nothing changes” – to the allusions to housing or immigration, has purchased the Vox framework. “Every day that passes he seems more like a Vox deputy than the head of state,” mentioned the secretary of Speech, Institutional Action and deputy spokesperson for the occasion, María Teresa Pérez, calling the speech “worryingly reactionary.” We can censure that the King spoke of an absence of coordination between administrations within the face of dana and never of local weather change or the “negligence” of Carlos Mazón; rejects the allusion to the tensions that immigration can generate; and factors out that mentioning the issues of entry to housing from a “huge palace” exhibits “how out of touch with reality” Felipe VI is. Belarra’s occasion has come to name the King an confederate of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, and has additionally regretted that he didn’t seek advice from the victims of sexist violence in his speech.


https://elpais.com/espana/2024-12-25/el-psoe-y-el-pp-celebran-la-defensa-del-consenso-y-la-serenidad-hecha-por-felipe-vi-y-evitan-darse-por-aludidos.html