Alito Spoke To Trump Before SCOTUS Asked To Delay Sentencing | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Donald Trump this week, simply hours earlier than Trump’s attorneys requested the court docket to delay sentencing Friday in his New York hush cash case.

Alito first confirmed that the pair spoke by cellphone in an announcement to ABC News on Wednesday, saying he had taken a name from the president-elect to offer a job reference for a former legislation clerk.

“William Levi, one of my former law clerks, asked me to take a call from President-elect Trump regarding his qualifications to serve in a government position,” the justice informed the information community. “I agreed to discuss this matter with President-elect Trump, and he called me yesterday afternoon.”

Alito mentioned he didn’t speak to Trump concerning the emergency submitting to name off sentencing on 34 felony counts of falsifying enterprise data to hide funds made to a porn actor earlier than the 2016 election.

“Indeed, I was not even aware at the time of our conversation that such an application would be filed,” Alito mentioned. “We also did not discuss any other matter that is pending or might in the future come before the Supreme Court or any past Supreme Court decisions involving the President-elect.”

"We also did not discuss any other matter that is pending or might in the future come before the Supreme Court or any past Supreme Court decisions involving the President-elect," Justice Samuel Alito said in a statement Wednesday.
“We also did not discuss any other matter that is pending or might in the future come before the Supreme Court or any past Supreme Court decisions involving the President-elect,” Justice Samuel Alito mentioned in an announcement Wednesday.

Alex Wong by way of Getty Images

Both ABC News and The New York Times observe it’s not uncommon for justices to function references for former clerks. But it is usually unprecedented for a president-elect to have private authorized proceedings earlier than the court docket.

The Countdown To Trump Is On

On Jan. 20, Donald Trump will reclaim probably the most highly effective seat in our nation’s authorities. HuffPost will proceed to fearlessly report on the brand new administration — however we want your assist.

We imagine important info throughout this unprecedented time must be free for everybody. With your help, we will present crucial information with out paywalls.

You’ve supported HuffPost earlier than, and we’ll be trustworthy — we might use your assist once more. We view our mission to offer free, truthful information as critically vital on this essential second, and we will not do it with out you.

Whether you give as soon as or many extra instances, we admire your contribution to maintaining our journalism free for all.

You’ve supported HuffPost earlier than, and we’ll be trustworthy — we might use your assist once more. We view our mission to offer free, truthful information as critically vital on this essential second, and we will not do it with out you.

Whether you give only one extra time or join once more to contribute repeatedly, we admire you taking part in a component in maintaining our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

New York Judge Juan Merchan has refused to once more postpone the sentencing listening to after the May 31 verdict. The listening to can be unprecedented for a former president or president-elect, and Merchan has ordered Trump to look in individual or by way of video convention whereas a sentence is handed down.

Trump has denied any wrongdoing regardless of the conviction, and his attorneys have aggressively moved to cease the sentencing, which might be simply 10 days earlier than his inauguration. Those efforts to this point have failed, and an appeals court docket refused to step in earlier this month.

Merchan has indicated he won’t impose any jail time or vital penalties in opposition to Trump, as an alternative calling a probable unconditional discharge probably the most “viable solution.” But he wrote in a current ruling that it was within the curiosity of justice to conclude the sentencing listening to to deliver “finality to this matter.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/samuel-alito-trump-phone-call-hush-money_n_677f18abe4b018662a3bc7e7