Faced with parliamentarians, Gabriel Attal defends his “rigorous conduct” | EUROtoday
Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
LE cleaning soap opera of steady deficit. This week, from Tuesday January 4 to six, 2025, the finance committee – endowed with the powers of a fee of inquiry – continues its hearings on the degradation of public funds between October 2023 and 2024. After the publication, on November 19 Report of the Senate data mission on the slip of the general public deficit, it’s the flip of the fee of inquiry chaired by Éric Coquerel (LFI), and whose rapporteurs are Éric Ciotti (UDR) and Mathieu Lefèvre (EPR ), to audition former members of the federal government on the good slide of the 12 months 2024.
After the listening to a month in the past, from Bruno Le Maire, former Minister of the Economy, and Thomas Cazenave, former Minister chargeable for public accounts, the Commission heard for the primary time, this Tuesday, Gabriel Attal, Former Prime Minister of France between January and September 2024. Will ensue in the course of the week Michel Barnier, former Prime Minister, Pierre Chabrol, Minister Advisor to Economic Affairs, in addition to Aurélien Rousseau, former director of Cabinet of Élisabeth Terminal. The fee’s goal is easy: understanding how the state deficit, initially deliberate at 4.4 %, was capable of attain the report determine of 6.1 %, in 2024.
Three hours of listening to
This Tuesday, confronted with parliamentarians, Gabriel Attal got here to clarify his motion and choices, as Prime Minister. In comparability together with his listening to, just a few months earlier within the Senate, the latter appeared extra serene and fewer on the defensive. For three hours, the previous Prime Minister sought to reveal level by level to what level his “energy” had been completely turned in direction of the “master’s degree in public finances”.
Read too A Senate report factors to the “budgetary irresponsibility” of the earlier governments“From the outset, I affirmed a rigorous line of conduct in budgetary matters,” he mentioned, itemizing, amongst different issues, the restoration of the electrical energy tax in January, the cancellation of the ten billion euros From budgetary credit for the State or the doubling of medical deductibles, three measures taken throughout its lease in Matignon. “Did the two electoral deadlines-early European and legislative elections-influence this calendar? », In particular asked him Éric Ciotti, rapporteur of the investigation. “I consider I’ve demonstrated that no, in any other case I can’t have made all these choices so unpopular,” replied Gabriel Attal, assured of his argument. If the current leader EPR in the Assembly recognizes that “every part has not been good”, he assures him, everything, under his action, has been put in place in order to limit the explosion of the deficit .
A more courteous tone than in the Senate
The macronist had also prepared an “announcement” during his hearing. In the preamble, he wanted to mention a note “quite little relayed within the public debate” of the INSEE. “State price range deficit in 2024 was decreased by 17 billion,” he proudly proclaims. A symbol of success, according to the former Prime Minister, which is however without knowing that a difference is between the state deficit and the public deficit … the public deficit being the sum of the deficits of the different branches of ‘Public administration, incorporating, among other things, the state deficit. Moreover, Gabriel Attal has, several times during these three hours, wanted to salute the “braveness” and the “professionalism” of his colleagues, in the lead Bruno Lemaire, former Minister of the Economy.
Faced with him, Éric Coquerel, a professional in his role as chairman of the commission, still tried to support the flaws of his colleague’s argument in the hemicycle. “From the moment everything showed that the recipes were not sufficient. Why did you not spend your time looking for superior recipes, “arrested the rebellious, recognizing in passing that the deficit is extra defined by a scarcity of income quite than a rise in bills.
“There is a political difference between us,” replied the present president of Renaissance. “When I try to reduce the deficit, I look at the expenses to be reduced, where you defend a reflex to increase taxes. Several times in substance on the substance, the two, however, hardly sought to stage their disagreements. Conversely of his hearing in the Senate last November, the tone between Gabriel Attal and the two rapporteurs was much more courteous.
Passing weapons with the RN
To uncover
The kangaroo of the day
Answer
Only Jean-Philippe Tanguy (RN) sought, throughout his talking, to assault the previous Prime Minister advert hominem. “It is difficult in 10 minutes to challenge so many lies,” he began to open a fast and confused passage of arms between the 2 thirties. “There are 67 billion additional expenses, who spent them, Michel Barnier?” “, Asks the first. “Mr. Tanguy, you should not have listened to the entire of my remarks,” replied the second to him dryly before engaging on a technical demonstration of public spending. “We usually are not in a debate Mr. Attal, I’ll go away you my quantity to prepare this,” ends up letting go of the lepenist. “I believe you’re chafouin of my reply,” smiles hearing. Atmosphere…
Aside from this altercation, if the atmosphere has remained cordial, it is not certain that Gabriel Attal, despite his usual insurance, managed to convince all of the deputies in front of him. In the last seconds of the hearing, Éric Coquerel has, again, sought to emphasize it. “All this leaves me a bit of dreamy […] I proceed to not be satisfied, ”concludes the president of the committee. Wednesday at 9 am, will Michel Barnier this Wednesday be extra convincing?
https://www.lepoint.fr/politique/degradation-du-deficit-face-aux-parlementaires-gabriel-attal-defend-sa-conduite-rigoureuse-04-02-2025-2581574_20.php