Lucy Letby’s attorneys urge evaluate of case after medical consultants declare infants weren’t murdered | EUROtoday
Child serial killer Lucy Letby didn’t homicide seven infants at a hospital neonatal unit, a panel of consultants has claimed, after a report discovered every toddler had died from pure causes and poor medical care.
Dr Shoo Lee, who assembled a panel of 14 consultants together with world-leading neonatologists in a evaluate of the medical proof within the case, concluded “we did not find any murders” as her authorized group submitted their findings to the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
The former nurse, 35, is serving 15 whole-life orders for the homicide of seven infants and tried homicide of seven others between June 2015 and June 2016 on the Countess of Chester Hospital, however has continued to protest her innocence.
Dr Lee, the president of the Canadian Neonatal Foundation, convened the group of consultants amid issues over the medical proof utilized in her trial.
The panel reviewed the seven murders and tried murders and, in every case, discovered demise or damage was as a result of pure causes or errors in medical care.

He offered the bombshell findings at a press convention led by Letby’s attorneys and MP Sir David Davis, who described her convictions as “one of the major injustices of modern times”.
Dr Lee stated: “In summary, ladies and gentleman, we did not find any murders. In all cases death or injury were deemed to be natural causes or just bad medical care.”
Letby’s lawyer, Mark McDonald, stated: “The reason why Lucy Letby was convicted was because of the medical evidence that was presented to the jury. That today has been demolished.”
He known as for her case to be urgently referred to the Court of Appeal, including: “There is overwhelming evidence that the conviction is unsafe. If Dr Shoo Lee is correct then no crime was committed.”
Retired medic Dr Lee, who co-authored a 1989 tutorial paper on air embolism in infants which was cited within the trial however the analysis has since been outdated, advised the press convention “we are here to tell the truth”.
Speaking of the sufferer’s households, he stated: “We understand their stress and their anguish, and our work is not meant to cause more distress.

“Rather, it’s meant to present them consolation and assurance in figuring out the reality about what actually occurred.”
Dr Lee questioned the reason for demise for every of the infants killed by Letby, who was stated to have focused the infants in a wide range of methods together with injecting air into their intravenous traces.
In the case of Baby 1, he argued the toddler died from a blood clot or thrombosis, and there was no proof of air embolism.
Similarly for Baby 4, who was stated to have been steady earlier than Letby injected air into her IV line, the panel declare there was no proof of air embolism and the toddler died of systemic sepsis and pneumonia after medics didn’t deal with the mom with antibiotics when she was pregnant.
In one other case, the place Letby was accused of injecting insulin into the child’s infusion bag, the consultants stated the toddler suffered extended hypoglycaemia due to sepsis.
Dr Lee was additionally vital of the care supplied at Countess of Chester Hospital, claiming that if it had been in Canada – the place he lives – it might have been shut down.
The panel additionally included the previous president of the British Medical Association, Professor Neena Modi, who stated there have been “very, very plausible reasons” for every of the deaths, together with delayed prognosis and “inappropriate or absent treatment”.

Letby misplaced two bids final 12 months to problem her convictions on the Court of Appeal – in May for seven murders and 7 tried murders, and in October for the tried homicide of a child woman which she was convicted of by a special jury at a retrial.
At the primary of these appeals, a bid to confess recent proof from Dr Lee was rejected as three senior judges concluded there had been no prosecution knowledgeable proof diagnosing air embolus solely on the idea of pores and skin discolouration.
Dr Lee stated he has lately up to date his tutorial paper and located no instances of pores and skin discolouration linked to air embolism by the venous system.
In December, Letby’s barrister Mark McDonald stated – that individually from the CCRC utility – he would additionally search permission from the Court of Appeal to use to reopen her case on the grounds that Dr Dewi Evans, the lead prosecution medical knowledgeable at her trial, was “not reliable”.
Retired guide paediatrician Dr Evans stated issues relating to his proof had been “unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate”.
Following the surprising findings, the prime minister’s spokesman stated the case was “horrendous” and “shocked the nation”, however stated it was as much as the impartial CCRC to evaluate her utility.
A CCRC spokesperson stated: “We are aware that there has been a great deal of speculation and commentary surrounding Lucy Letby’s case, much of it from parties with only a partial view of the evidence.

“We ask that everybody remembers the households affected by occasions on the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016.
“We have obtained a preliminary utility in relation to Ms Letby’s case, and work has begun to evaluate the appliance. We anticipate additional submissions being made to us.”
The spokesman warned it isn’t potential to find out how lengthy it can take to evaluate this utility, including {that a} “significant volume of complicated evidence” was offered at trial.
A public inquiry into how the nurse dedicated her crimes can also be below means, and detectives from Cheshire Constabulary are persevering with their evaluate of the care of some 4,000 infants admitted to hospital whereas Letby labored as a neonatal nurse.
A CPS spokesman stated: “Two juries and three appeal court judges have reviewed a multitude of different strands of evidence against Lucy Letby. She has been convicted on 15 separate counts following two separate jury trials.
“In May 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed Letby’s leave to appeal on all grounds – rejecting her argument that expert prosecution evidence was flawed.”
A spokesperson on the Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust stated: “Due to the Thirlwall Inquiry and the ongoing police investigations, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/lucy-letby-appeal-ccrc-medical-evidence-b2691998.html