London and the virtually unattainable mission: save the transatlantic unit | EUROtoday

Listen to the audio model of the article

On February 17 in Paris on the summit with European leaders, in a number of days in Washington for a gathering with Donald Trump: the British premier Keir Starmer claims to need to be “the bridge” between the EU and the USA, however it’s a position that’s at all times changing into harder. Downing Street has confirmed that Starmer will meet the American president subsequent week to “deepen the Special Relationship on trade, investments and security”. Meanwhile, nevertheless, the British Labor chief has deployed with the European allies, changing into the primary head of presidency to commit himself to sending Peacekeeping troops to Ukraine.

The node of navy expenditure

It is a decisive step but additionally an indication of continuity: from the second Russia invaded Ukraine nearly three years in the past London supported Kiev with out hesitation. Several premier have adopted each other however monetary help, navy assist and solidarity in direction of Ukraine have continued.

This is the “easy” facet of Starmer’s promise: he is aware of he can rely on the approval of public opinion and on the inexperienced mild of the deputies of (nearly) all events when there’s a vote in parliament on the sending of British troopers in Ukraine. Two different points, alternatively, are anticipated to be troublesome. The first downside is inner. Starmer promised to extend the bills for protection from 2.3% to 2.5% of GDP, however didn’t specify when. The navy leaders say it isn’t sufficient, whereas Trump asks for five%.

Even a rise at 2.5% would price about 6 billion kilos a yr extra in a part by which public accounts are in deep disaster. The authorities might be pressured to decide on between improve charges or drastically lower public spending, each choices that would make Labor lose their subsequent elections.

Military capability to the road

General Richard Dannatt, a former military chief of workers, mentioned that the British armed forces are “so badly” that they can’t be capable to make a major contribution to the upkeep of peace in Ukraine, the place “at least 100 thousand soldiers would be needed” .