Maggie Haberman Exposes Hypocrisy In Musk’s Reported New Trump Play | EUROtoday

The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman shone a lightweight on billionaire Elon Musk’s reported want to pump $100 million into what Haberman described as “entities that are controlled by” President Donald Trump’s political crew.

It could be “something very different” from what particular authorities worker Musk, the world’s richest particular person, has finished prior to now, Haberman instructed CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Wednesday. She famous that Musk gave nearly $300 million to spice up Trump and GOP causes through the 2024 elections however that was by way of his personal political motion committee.

And Haberman, a political analyst for CNN, advised Trump would not be completely satisfied if Democrats did this similar factor.

“It would be a different kind of approach,” Haberman stated of Musk’s transfer, which she and Times colleague Theodore Schleifer reported on first.

The backdrop, Haberman defined to Cooper, was the reportedly “very contentious Cabinet meeting” when Trump officers clashed with Musk over what they worry is his unchecked energy in his Trump-enabled position of gutting authorities. That was adopted by Musk’s presence at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort and on Air Force One, after which their Tesla-promoting stunt on the White House when Trump basically acted as a salesman on behalf of Musk’s electrical car firm.

Cooper requested, “How might somebody look at this? Is this Elon Musk worrying about his position vis-a-vis Trump after that contentious meeting which you and your colleagues reported on and broke that story? And this is a way to influence that or ensure that?”

Haberman stated it “absolutely helped solidify” Musk’s standing with Trump.

Musk seems to have “some sense of how to work with this president and what exactly he wants,” Haberman continued. “But in terms of the broader question, there’s just never been a situation where you have a part-time employee to the government working inside the White House complex and also making this kind of a donation to a president’s political apparatus.”

“It’s unprecedented,” she added. “It is also the kind of thing that, you know, I suspect that Donald Trump would have gotten very upset about had a Democrat done it.”