The National Assembly is split on the strengthening of help for Ukraine | EUROtoday
Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
Un divided hemicycle. The National Assembly adopted, Wednesday, March 12, on the finish of lengthy hours of debate, a decision to strengthen Ukraine help, notably containing a name to grab Russian property. This textual content, adopted by 288 votes to 54, has primarily a symbolic worth. Only rebellious France voted towards, whereas the National Rally and the Allied group of Eric Ciotti abstained.
If the textual content, proposed by the Liot group, was voted by a big majority, the query of the seizure of Russian property was one of many culminated factors of the cleavage of the Assembly. This was notably defended by ex-Prime Minister Gabriel Attal (Together for the Republic), whereas the federal government is opposed, fearing that the monetary stability of Europe can be threatened.
RN and LFI deputies have additionally opposed this concept. The nationwide rally notably invoked “an interrogation on international law”, within the phrases of Matthias Renault, deputy from the far proper of the threee Railing of the Somme. “The decision obviously does not belong to the legislator […] But depends on decisions of foreign judges, “he justified on the 210 billion Russian banking property.
“The assets of the oligarchs, our group is totally favorable to their seizures, but we do not have the legislative tool which allows us,” stated, for his half, the rebellious Bastien Lachaud, citing the instance of Canada which he signifies that he has come up towards “the fundamental law of property”.
Read too War in Ukraine: why Paris and Berlin shield the frozen property of the KremlinIn a press launch, rebellious France explains “having chosen to vote against the European resolution relating to the war in Ukraine”, believing that the decision is “completely disconnected from the international situation”. “This resolution does not at any time call into question the alignment of France with the United States”, in keeping with them, as a result of the textual content “promotes a Europe of defense whose orders will gain the state industry of armament, to the detriment of our independence”.
Debates on the membership of Ukraine to the EU
The hemicycle was additionally divided, throughout generally stormy debates, on the query of the development of a Europe of protection or of help for the membership strategy of Ukraine to the European Union, throughout the RN, the rebellious, and even past. “Free movement would lead to disaster. We cannot forever produce the same mistakes, ”deplored the deputy for the ecological group François Ruffin.
“Yes, we are able to help Ukraine with out eager to systematically adhere to the European Union. I even wish to say, it’s as a result of we help his sovereignty, which we advise him to not be part of, “pleaded Laurent Jacobelli (national rally), deploring a” new interference “.
“We have the best to say that we don’t need, throughout the European Union, of a rustic the place the minimal wage is 200 euros,” said the rebellious Sophia Chikirou. “The bill for this enlargement can be nonetheless and all the time the French to must pay it,” abounded, for its part, Maxime Michelet (Union of Laws for the Republic). “It shouldn’t be this night that Parliament can be known as upon to vote for the membership of Ukraine to the EU, which is a really lengthy, very demanding course of,” reassured the Minister of Relations with Parliament, Patrick Mignola.
The vote of this text intervened in the middle of a geopolitical tumult, marked by the acceleration of peace talks. Donald Trump, who presses Putin to accept a truce proposal, even assured that US officials were on Wednesday evening to negotiate in Russia.
https://www.lepoint.fr/politique/l-assemblee-nationale-se-divise-sur-le-renforcement-du-soutien-a-l-ukraine-13-03-2025-2584627_20.php