almost a 3rd of the articles censored by the Constitutional Council | EUROtoday

The Constitutional Council censored, Thursday, March 20, completely or partially, almost a 3rd of the articles of the agricultural orientation regulation, whose disputed precept of “Non-regression of food sovereignty”mirror of environmental non-regression already consecrated.

This regulation, lengthy -awaited to answer the agricultural anger motion and adopted at a cost in February earlier than the Agricultural Show, additionally devoted the “Good faith” alleged farmers throughout checks and predicts the character “Unintentional” From sure environmental injury, in two additionally censored provisions. The flagship precept of the regulation, which erects “Protection, valuation and development of agriculture” to the rank of“Major general interest”request from the FNSEA, a historic agricultural union, was not affected.

That of “Non-regression of food sovereignty” had been added by the senators, however elected officers and jurists doubted the scope of the system, the safety of the surroundings having a constitutional worth, whereas this “Major general interest” is registered in a easy regulation. In element, the Constitutional Council, of which that is the primary choice on a regulation because the arrival of Richard Ferrand to the presidency, utterly censorship fourteen articles and partially three articles of the agricultural orientation regulation for meals sovereignty and the renewal of generations in agriculture, after a referral by the deputies of the teams La France Insoumise (LFI) and environmentalist, in line with the choice.

A “necessary text”, in line with the Minister of Agriculture

Is additionally censored a provision which offered that the “Regulatory standards in agriculture cannot go beyond the minimum requirements of European standards, except when they are specially motivated and evaluated before their adoption and they are not likely to generate a situation of unfair competition”. She responded to farmers’ demand to cease the “Detransposition” European requirements, notably when it comes to phytosanitary merchandise and thresholds for farming buildings.

The exclusion of agricultural buildings of the assertion of soil artificialization throughout the framework of the zero -artificialization internet (ZAN) system, maintained by the Senate in opposition to the opinion of the federal government, was additionally censored. The article was tried “Cavalier”that’s to say with out ample hyperlink with the textual content.

A textual content ensuing from a joint joint committee settlement had been largely adopted by the Parliament in mid-February, with the macronist voices, the correct and the nationwide rally. While the Minister of Agriculture, Annie Genevard, had defended a “Strong response to requests[es] farmers ” and a “Text required”the left, the Ecologists in thoughts, had denounced a “Major environmental regression”.