Who of the bear or the person should depart the Pyrenees? | EUROtoday

On Mar 20, 2025

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

” HASU help! A bear is eating me! This sentence is the title of a book written by Mykle Hansen and published in 2014. Did a hunter in Ariège on November 20, 2021 near the Rocher de l’Aigle, at some 1,300 meters above sea level. During a boar hunt, the man found himself face to face with a bear and his two little ones. Affective and formidable situation at the same time, because the plantigrade, no doubt feeling his threatened little ones, would have attacked the one who will end up in the hospital evacuated urgently by helicopter.

The octogenarian defined: “She grabbed my left thigh, I panicked and I pulled a stroke of rifle. She fell backwards, she bypassed me and bit my right calf, I fell, she poured my leg, I rearmed my rifle and I pulled. She died five meters below. ” Impressive ! The type of story that’s solely believed to be reserved for movies shot within the Greater North American or within the Caucasus mountains.

The hunter prosecuted for “hunting in a prohibited area”

But again to Mykle Hansen’s ebook and this extract: “Do you think you have problems?” Me, I’m being devoured by a bear! […] And do you are worried in regards to the setting? So! Your setting has simply eaten a foot! I piss my blood in your setting. Or how from fiction to actuality through satire the place the creator wonders if the bear shouldn’t be turning into the way forward for man, there is just one imprint. An imprint and a trial wherein the attacked hunter in addition to 15 different folks practiced looking exercise appeared on March 18.

The Ariégeois was tried for “hunting in an prohibited area” and “destruction of protected species”. With, to remind him of his duties, at least 19 associations current on the Foix courtroom which went a civil occasion.

So a lot for the info. Now let’s discuss opinions. With, on the one hand, the environmentalists who denounce the loss of life of the caramel bear throughout a hunt deemed unlawful and, on the opposite, the federation of looking which, by means of the voice of its president, stated: “A bear is dead, a man is alive. It’s sad, but I prefer that this is what the opposite. »»

Read too These threats weighing on the bears of the Pyrenees

Let us pose the problem differently and imagine that, in place of the hunter, it is a mushroom collector or an unarmed hiker who could not have, de facto, neutralize the animal. Unless you know how to whisper in the Bear’s ear to explain to him that he had no intention of attacking his little ones, the quidam in question risked, you will agree, to finish in a Charpie. Another alternative, a hunter’s witness of the scene offers to intervene. What is the hiker doing? He declines the offer and is quietly shouting or accepts Providence which, for this occurrence, is in the form of a gunshot. Obviously, considering the situation, the answer seems to be found!

But there remains a difficult cohabitation between the bear and human activities, whether pastoral, tourist, economic hunting.

Read too The bear, the fallen king who regains the hair of the beast

In Italy, almost two years ago, a hiker was killed by a plantigrade less than 300 meters from his village on a forest track. In Romania, 14 people die each year after being attacked by a bear. In France, a report of the General Inspectorate of the Environment and Sustainable Development published at the end of 2023 estimated that the Ursine population could reach 350 individuals by 2030, against around a hundred currently in the Pyrenees. The Pyrenees where breeders fear the presence of the bear for their herds despite the systems put in place by the State up to 4.5 million euros provided for 2025.

How to ensure man protection?

Should we really reintroduce the bear in French natural areas? If so, how to ensure the protection of man and that of herds? Two alternatives: either it is necessary to completely prohibit access to certain perimeters, which would require a physical partition of the territory and would not be acceptable either for users of nature or for breeders. Either we must protect these same perimeters, which implies close protection and armed with these same users, knowing that the former roam the mountains for their leisure, while the latter practice a sedentary professional activity as old as the history of pastoralism.

The equation, since political ecology, in the 1990s, decided to reintegrate Slovenia bears in the Pyrenees, never ceases to be insoluble. And the fear, in terms of dramas and clashes that make the news between pro and anti-mons, is regularly reactivated.

Only certainty, in the end, no one is quiet, neither the animal defending his young nor those who fear his presence on the trails, in the forests, near the sheepfolds.

To uncover

The kangaroo of the day

Answer

So, within the Pyrenees, who of the bear or the person should go? Obviously, solely those that have at some point crossed the primary one very intently are actually empowered to precise themselves!

Former agricultural commerce unionist, Jean-Paul Pelras, journalist and creator of a number of works, has simply revealed Peasant sacrifice – in 20 years, French farmers can have disappearedby Erick Bonnier editions.

https://www.lepoint.fr/debats/qui-de-l-ours-ou-de-l-homme-doit-quitter-les-pyrenees-19-03-2025-2585193_2.php