A survey ebook returns to the drapol drama | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.


“SAle sits ”. “I hope her children will be planted by an Arab. “Advice: take a look at how the traitors and collaborators ended on the finish of the 40 battle” … Here are some of the threats and insults received by the authors of the book One night in France (Grasset), released on March 19. Attacks denounced by the publisher, joined by the Association of the Judicial Press, in a press release.

Evening level

Every night from 6 p.m.

Receive the knowledge analyzed and deciphered by writing the purpose.

THANKS !
Your registration has been taken under consideration with the e-mail tackle:

To uncover all of our different newsletters, go right here: my account

By registering, you settle for the final circumstances of use and our privateness coverage.

The investigation of Jean-Michel Décugis, Pauline Guéna and Marc Leplongeon returns to the demise of Thomas, a 16-year-old rugby participant, killed on the finish of a village ball in Crépol (Drôme), on the evening of November 18 to 19, 2023, throughout a confrontation with younger individuals from a delicate district of Romans-sur-Isère. This flammable drama had shaken society and the French political class. He continues, greater than a yr later, to arouse epidermal reactions. For what ? Interview with one of many authors, Marc Leplongeon.

The level : The launch of your ebook has been controversial and launched a wave of cyberbulling towards you. What occurred and the way do you reside it?

Marc Leplongeon : Our ebook has been the topic of sturdy criticisms, notably on CNews, the place Pascal Praud devoted a number of sequel applications to us from the start of final week. Except that he had not learn the ebook, which solely went out on Wednesday. On his set, we had been violently taken to job individually, with criticisms which might be extra slander. This was accompanied by 1000’s of dwell feedback on social networks, concomitant to Pascal Praud’s applications.

We have acquired demise threats to our private social accounts. Admittedly, we now have a feather career, which exposes us to criticism, and that poses no downside. But it’s nonetheless crucial that they’re constructive and that the ebook has been learn. For instance, Pascal Praud invited the mayor of Romans-sur-Isère who stated he had not met us. Then, in Le Figarothree days later, she had discovered her reminiscence and stated the other. It makes us move for liars, and it’s insufferable.

Do you not contemplate having written a ebook “thesis” on the drapol drama?

No method ! We begin from the sphere and the investigation to write down a meticulous, factual story, the place nothing is hidden. A sure press tries to make our work the delirium of three “Islamo-leftists”. However, we clarify how, the day after the drama, there was an on the spot political restoration, aimed toward making the primary anti-white racist homicide in France, a “Francocide”.

Read too Is anti-white racism? And this, on the time, with out the slightest aspect of investigation on this sense, and whereas everybody known as for prudence, gendarmes and legal professional included. A couple of days after the drama, he indicated that he had no aspect accrediting an aggravating circumstance of “anti-white racism”. The query of the annoying circumstance could also be re-examined in the course of the judicial investigation or earlier than the Assize Court. But because it stands, this isn’t the case.

You denounce a “excitement” across the Crépol affair. What do you seek advice from?

The semantic battle begins from the beginning. In his first press launch, the Valence prosecutor speaks of “programmed” transport. For what ? Because younger individuals who got here to the Ball de Crépol are known as and carpool to achieve the night. From there, it was shortly concluded that it was a punitive expedition to “kill white”. However, the truth of the file, at the moment, doesn’t present it. Just like the truth that the suspects would have come on goal to “kill white”. In actuality, they inform the investigators all the time have the knives on them to chop their shit.

But you perceive that it shocks, that these younger individuals come armed at a village ball?

Obviously ! It is a large public safety downside. They are armed, they’re offenders, for some condemned by justice, and whose information of processing of judicial historical past point out many details of drug trafficking, theft with violence, harassment …

But all that, we’re speaking about it! If that they had been proven that that they had come on goal to kill, the investigation would have been opened for “assassination” and never “murder in an organized gang”. These younger individuals sleep all day, make the PlayStation all evening. When they go on the run, they inhale balloons, they plan to go to Morocco by forgetting their passports, they don’t understand the gravity of the details in any respect … They don’t have the profile of political activists. The prosecutor talks about “toads”, perceive, small strikes.

Certainly, however do not you have got the impression of minimizing the details?

No, at no time. We dwell badly this criticism. Certain interviews made on tv and radio haven’t been understood, they deserve improvement and nuance. This is why we wrote a ebook. We don’t decrease after we inform the provocative conduct of younger individuals on the ball, how they dance and are insistent with ladies, how a lot they denotes within the environment of the ball …

Nor is it minimizing to say that the causes of the final battle should not clearly established. The magistrates see there a number of potentialities: altercation towards a background of alcohol, the racist insults towards the Arabs, the racist insults towards the whites, the conduct of younger individuals of cash with ladies … We merely restore the chronology of details with the data of the investigators.

Does this drama have all of the substances to beat the straightforward information merchandise and turn into a truth of society?

Yes, undoubtedly. We see it with the talk on the existence of anti-white racism, which makes react to the highest of the federal government, with Bruno Retailleau, Gérald Darmanin…

On anti-white racism, we accuse you of this outing on the set of “C to you” (France 5), the place you say, in regards to the night in Crépol: “There have been anti-white racist insults, but anti-white racism is a concept of extreme right, in jurisprudence, that does not exist. What do you mean precisely?

I would like to clarify this intervention which I have been grieved and which is not in the book, like most of what we were criticized this week. Anti-white racism is indeed a concept theorized by the extreme right, which does not exist judicially, before the courts. I distinguish the systemic racism of racial hatreds which are used in our society. The first concerns the Arabs and blacks who, because of their name or their origin, find it difficult to find work or accommodation, for example. There is also a latent anti -Semitism in France, with an explosion of verbal and physical violence against the Jews.

And, moreover, fringes of the population are hostile to whites. Police who intervene in sensitive districts can testify! In the book, we show that there have been anti-white and anti-French insults during the ball. We make it an entire chapter and we even reveal the doubts of the gendarmes and magistrates on how to qualify the facts, to the point that the gendarmes, five days after the drama, wondered about “constituent components of aggravating circumstance” and concluded: “The authors of the details might have come to the Ball of Crépol to be able to kill individuals of white coloration. But the remainder of the investigation has not proven that it was an anti-white raid, any greater than the crime cellular.

Do you perceive that opinion will be shocked by the circumstances of the drama, its context and its authors, and doesn’t essentially linger on the cellular of the crime as such?

Of course, however it’s denying the work of the journalist and the investigator. There is a screaming separatism within the plaster case, that a part of the left might not need to see. We have younger individuals who don’t share the identical hobbies, who frequent the identical transport however don’t communicate to one another, and see one another as “the Arab of the class” or “the French of the class”. Questioned by the gendarmes on a possible anti-white act, considered one of them replied: “Not at all, I even have a white friend”, as Nadine Morano had stated: “I have a black friend”. Obviously, this can be a downside: integration didn’t work, some younger individuals from the forex have attended native rugby golf equipment, however come again. When they depart their metropolis, they are saying: “We go to Romans”, whereas they already dwell there …

Why does Crépol set off such eruptive reactions?

There is a dimension of which we communicate much less, nevertheless it’s vital: it’s the opposition between town and the countryside. When we speak about varied details, stab wounds, it typically occurs on the town. However, right here, we now have younger individuals who social gathering in a small village, with their traditions, after looking or rugby within the afternoon. Suddenly, they’re disturbed by “scum” of town. This is in that the case of crunch shocks. Moreover, it’s fascinating to notice that within the first days, it’s not all the time the picture of the village corridor of Crépol which illustrates the articles of sure media, which generally desire to publish the picture of the village church. We discover this opposition between a Christian, rural, peaceable France, and hordes of younger individuals from cities. On CNews, a columnist prophesies a “deep territorial aggressiveness” and strips of thugs which “will soon enter the houses”.Read too Death of Thomas to Crépol: the mayor of Romans-sur-Isère, once more threatened with demise, information a criticism

In the ebook, you point out specifically the circumstances of the prosecutor and the mayor of Romans-sur-Isère. What function did they play on this case?


To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

Answer



The two maintain virtually reverse roles. The prosecutor begins by saying the expression of “programmed expedition”. Then he’ll row, saying that he won’t ever be influenced by the commentators. He then refuses to offer the whole identification of the suspects when the TV units claimed it. He may be very current, however nonetheless on a thread in a case that smells of sulfur.

The mayor of Romans-sur-Isère, Marie-Hélène Thoraval, doesn’t solely stigmatize the suspects after the details, however the entire district of La Currency, which in line with her, comprises “dynasties of delinquents”. When we speak to her in regards to the unemployed price within the neighborhood, she has this reply: “Are they even employable?” ». The mayor additionally makes the hyperlink between the Crépol affair and Islam when it merely doesn’t exist. I discover that she too was threatened with demise for her talking. Which, no matter his opinions, stays unacceptable.


https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/rien-n-est-cache-un-livre-enquete-revient-sur-le-drame-de-crepol-24-03-2025-2585549_23.php