EDF and contradictory injunctions | EUROtoday
EDF has by no means been a enterprise like some other. But the sequence that resulted, Friday, March 21, to interchange its CEO, Luc Rémont, will ask the query of what the general public electrical energy large. An organization which should guarantee its sustainability because of the advantages it provides off, or a administration with public service mission consisting in offering the most affordable vitality doable with the intention to facilitate the nation’s reindustrialisation and guarantee its vitality sovereignty? By thanking the boss of EDF, Emmanuel Macron gave his reply: a form of “at the same time”, which may be sensible in politics, however problematic within the enterprise world.
The eviction of Luc Rémont of the pinnacle of EDF comes after a little bit greater than two years in mandate, throughout which he managed to revive the corporate’s electrical energy manufacturing capability. This had been undermined by the multiplication of corrosion issues, which had led to stopping two thirds of the park of nuclear reactors within the midst of an vitality disaster. Since then, manufacturing has elevated by 30 %, permitting France to turn out to be a transparent exporter of electrical energy.
This return to higher fortune made it doable to stabilize the debt, to return to income and to pay attention now on two structuring topics for the way forward for the corporate. The first is to know at which EDF charge can promote its electrical energy, the second considerations the development of six new nuclear reactors, introduced in 2022 by the Head of State. Even if the 2 recordsdata should not a part of the identical temporality, they’re intimately linked, as a result of the capability of the corporate to spend money on the long run is dependent upon that to determine brief -term income.
The entire query is the place to put the cursor between the pursuits of EDF, which should assume a heavy funding program, and the protection of the competitiveness of French business because of reasonably priced vitality. This quadrature of the circle has brought on tensions which were crescendo in current months.

It is tough to reproach the CEO for piling up by guaranteeing the social curiosity of the corporate he directs. Being 100 % owned by the State, since 2023, doesn’t, nonetheless, make an administration held to favor the overall curiosity to the detriment of its financial viability.
It is simply as unusual as some so-called “electro-intensive” clients accuse Luc Rémont of getting performed “An arm of honor to French industry” By providing them a dearer pricing system than they paid thus far underneath the so -called “regulated access to historic nuclear electricity” (ARENH). In what title these corporations, that are all the time fast to defend free competitors and the market financial system for their very own circumstances, criticize EDF for pricing that solely respects the European regulation and competitors framework?
Asking EDF to promote its electrical energy at low costs is all of the much less audible since, on the similar time, the State presss the group to finance the revival of the French nuclear with a kind of EPR whose design just isn’t absolutely stopped, to rebuild a sector battered by the procrastination of Mr. Macron’s first mandate. The successor of Mr. Rémont, Bernard Fontana, present director basic of Framatome, will certainly must be extra diplomacy than him, however he won’t be able to make a miracle within the face of as many contradictory injunctions.
https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2025/03/25/edf-et-les-injonctions-contradictoires_6586001_3232.html