‘It’s actually not a giant deal’: Trump responds to newest spherical texts revealed in Signal textual content scandal | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

President Donald Trump has claimed it’s “not a big deal” {that a} journalist was added to a Signal group chat that high-level administration officers used to debate plans to strike Yemen.

The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffery Goldberg, who was inadvertently added to the group chat used to debate delicate army operations, revealed the messages on Wednesday after the White House and senior U.S. officers repeatedly claimed the chat didn’t include labeled info.

Trump responded to the leak throughout a Wednesday look on The Vince Show podcast by cognian win.

“There weren’t details, and there was nothing in there that compromised,” Trump mentioned. “And it had no impact on the attack, which was very successful.”

“A thing like that, maybe Goldberg found a way,” he added. “Maybe there’s a staffer, maybe there’s a very innocent staffer, but we’ll get, I think we’ll get to the bottom of it very quickly, and it’s really not a big deal.”

Trump claimed the messages about U.S. strikes on Yemen mistakenly shared with a journalist were ‘not a big deal’

Trump claimed the messages about U.S. strikes on Yemen mistakenly shared with a journalist have been ‘not a big deal’ (AP)

National Security Adviser Mike Waltz took full accountability for the snafu on Tuesday evening, telling Fox News’s Laura Ingraham {that a} staffer didn’t add Goldberg. The Atlantic reported Waltz added Goldberg to the chat.

“Well, look, a staffer wasn’t responsible,” Waltz mentioned. “Look, I take full responsibility. I built the group to make — my job is to make sure everything’s coordinated.”

He then went on to name Goldberg a “loser” who might have “deliberately” tricked somebody within the administration into gaining access to the chat.

Waltz, pictured, took ‘full responsibility’ for adding Goldberg to the group chat - but branded the editor a ‘loser’ anyway

Waltz, pictured, took ‘full responsibility’ for including Goldberg to the group chat – however branded the editor a ‘loser’ anyway (REUTERS)

The administration has dismissed Goldberg as a reporter who peddled in “hoaxes” hours earlier, regardless of a National Security Council spokesperson confirming the authenticity of the messages.

The messages from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, despatched on the day of the assault, March 15 however launched Wednesday, include an in depth timeline of when U.S. forces would strike Houthi targets in Yemen.

“Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME,” one of many messages Hegseth wrote that day mentioned.

Hegseth shared the plan roughly two hours earlier than the bombs dropped in Yemen, The Atlantic reported. Some 53 folks, together with kids, have been killed within the assaults.

Hegseth, pictured, sent a timeline of the planned strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen to the group chat

Hegseth, pictured, despatched a timeline of the deliberate strikes towards Houthi targets in Yemen to the group chat (Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)

Those featured within the chat included CIA director John Ratcliffe and Vice President JD Vance, who have been amongst these interacting with Hegseth when he shared the plans.

There have been 19 members within the chat group, in accordance with the screenshots revealed by The Atlantic. The outlet mentioned it has redacted the identify of a CIA official who is known as within the messages by Ratcliffe.

After the messages have been revealed, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt issued one other denial.

“The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT ‘war plans,’” she mentioned in a submit on X. “This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin.”

Hegseth additionally responded to the brand new report Wednesday, writing on X: So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic launched the so-called “war plans” and people “plans” embrace: No names. No targets. No areas. No models. No routes. No sources. No strategies. And no labeled info.”

“Those are some really s***** war plans. This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an “attack plan” (as he now calls it). Not even shut,” he added.

The Independent has contacted the White House for remark.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-waltz-yemen-signal-group-chat-b2722042.html