Movie villain has movie named after him – solely seems for 17 minutes | Films | Entertainment | EUROtoday

Cinema fanatics had been left gobsmacked to find {that a} legendary Hollywood horror determine graced the display screen for a mere 17 minutes in a movie named after him.

Despite this temporary look, the character’s impression was so profound it spawned an animated collection and a sequel movie years later.

The actor’s portrayal has grow to be a defining second in his profession, hailed as one in every of his most memorable performances regardless of how brief it was.

The revelation despatched shockwaves by way of the r/TodayILearned subreddit, the place film buffs shared their astonishment, prompting discussions in regards to the surprisingly restricted display screen time of different iconic villains.

The put up that sparked the dialog acknowledged: “TIL that Michael Keaton only had 17 minutes of screen time even though the movie was called Beetlejuice.”

This led to followers exchanging tales about Keaton’s involvement within the movie, together with hypothesis that the Batman star himself might have had one thing to do with the brevity of his presence.

One commenter claimed: “Supposedly one of his requirements to agree to do the sequel was to have the exact same screen time as the first movie. He knew that too much of that character would change the dynamic of the movie.”

Another added: “The thing about Beetlejuice is that it isn’t about Betelgeuse.

“It’s the story of a younger couple in a rustic city who put a variety of work into making the right house dying and being compelled to hang-out the home when it will get bought to New Yorkers who renovate it right into a ghastly postmodern museum. The factor about Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is it is not about something.”

A third user wrote: “17 minutes of pure gold. Keaton’s presence with that character was intense. Stoked to see the brand new one.” Keaton reprised his role as Beetlejuice in the follow-up film, which released last year.

Movie buffs have heaped accolades on another of Keaton’s films where his screen time was similarly brief. In his second outing as Batman in Batman Returns, Keaton graced the screen for a mere half-hour, despite the film’s star-studded cast.

One enthusiast commented: “Keaton had 32 minutes of display screen time in Batman Returns, too.” To which another responded: “Perfect quantity, imo. That film actually works as an amazing ensemble piece of Keaton, DeVito, Pfeiffer, and Walken.

“Despite the limited screen time, Keaton nails Batman and Bruce Wayne. I think Keaton’s more grounded, reclusive version of Bruce Wayne is the best portrayal of the character ever.”

While some argue that Keaton deserved extra display screen time in each Batman Returns and Beetlejuice, followers concede that the actor maximises each second he seems.

A fan expressed their opinion on-line, saying: “After a certain point, it’s not so much how much screen time you get as it is what you do with it. I do agree that the movie Beetlejuice could have benefitted from MORE Keaton scenes.”