Trump and his crew battle to comprise the fallout from the unimaginable safety leakage | EUROtoday

Read too Trump lieutenants mistakenly added a journalist to their top secret discussion groupFaced with journalists, Donald Trump then defended “a improbable crew”, and believed that Waltz “didn’t apologize”. “From what I perceive, it was not labeled data,” continued the 47th President of the United States. Who accused the Democrats and the press “of constructing a mountain as a result of we had two excellent months”.

All day long, the Trump camp tackled the ranks. The White House spokesperson, who accused The Atlantic To “sensualize” the case, assures, as the defense secretary Pete Hegseth the day before, “that no warfare plan was mentioned” and that the conversation did not contain classified information. For the bedroom. Mike Johnson, accidentally adding a journalist constitutes “a severe error” but he “absolutely confidence” in Mike Waltz. The Politico site, however, ensures that the future of the national security advisor is uncertain. If he has, for the moment, the support of the American president, the former advisor to Dick Cheney, deemed too close to the neoconservatives, is not unanimous in the Trump galaxy. “Everyone within the White House can agree on one factor: Mike Waltz is a fucking fool,” attacks a source of politico.

The intelligence patron saint in difficulty

Two alleged members of this Signal group were in front of the Senate Intelligence Commission on Tuesday: the intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, and CIA chief John Ratcliffe. Gabbard refused to confirm that she was the person identified as “TG” in the cat but also sworn that discussions “didn’t embrace labeled data”. “If so, share [la retranscription] with the fee. You can not have butter and butter cash, “said Democrat Mark Warner. Who called Mike Waltz and the Pentagon chief in the process, Pete Hegseth.

His friend Mark Kelly is the responsibility: “In this dialogue, there was the point out of a goal in Yemen”, as stated The Atlantic. Response from Gabbard, after a 5 -second break: “I do not remember a mention of specific targets. “And generic targets?” Continues the Democratic senator. New long break. “I think there was a discussion on targets, in general. »»

Read too Secret conversation of the Trump administration: an alarm signal for Europeans
To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

According to The Atlanticat 11:44 am on March 15, two hours earlier than the American strikes, the protection secretary despatched a message containing “operational details on imminent strikes in Yemen, including information on targets, the weapons that the United States will deploy and the sequence of attacks”.

If it was confirmed, this might represent a severe sprain within the protocol in place, in line with which delicate data referring to nationwide protection ought to solely be communicated on protected authorities techniques. Even if the conversations on sign, encrypted from begin to end, are safer than emails or SMS, the danger is way from zero: in February, security researchers of Google Threat Intelligence Group revealed that Moscow had managed to compromise sign by way of the “associated devices” operate, which permits specifically to seek the advice of its messages on a pc by scaning a QR code with its smartphone. And in line with CBS, the emissary for Ukraine Steve Witkoff, who was a part of the group, was, on the time of the exchanges … on the Kremlin.