“Chatgpt is the antithesis of Ghibli’s values” | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.


DEtuis on March 25, it solely takes a number of phrases seized in Chatgpt to deliver out dreamlike landscapes, skies with pastel shades and spherical faces with massive expressive eyes. This visible magic is predicated on a brand new picture technology operate, doped on the newest model of the AI ​​language mannequin, GPT-4O. Very rapidly, Internet customers seized it to divert the device and recreate-or somewhat a pasticher-the graphic universe of the Ghibli studio, well-known for the animated masterpieces of Hayao Miyazaki.

In a flash, an aesthetic has imposed itself: that of the Ghibli studio, with its bucolic hills, its delicate clouds like cotton, its misplaced youngsters in excessive herbs. According to the American website Know Your Even, it’s an American engineer, Grant Slatton, who would have kicked off this style by posting a easy household photograph “to Ghibli” on the networks. The picture has gone world wide. The relaxation adopted: celebrities, influencers, politicians … Until Emmanuel Macron himself, who lent himself to the sport of “Ghibization”.Read too The internet ignites for chatgpt which imitates Miyazaki, for higher and for worse

Enthusiasm was speedy. But, as usually, marvel rapidly gave technique to questions. Pillage or tribute? And at what value? To speak about it, The level met the filmmaker Léo Favier, writer of the documentary Miyazaki, the enchanterwhich was broadcast on Arte. Intimate connoisseur of the Japanese grasp’s work – he notably met his son Goro Miyazaki, in addition to Toshio Suzuki, emblematic producer and lifelong pal -, he returns to this surge of “Ghibli IA” with a double cap: that of the director and that of the nervous thinker within the face of the algorithmic standardization of our creativeness.

The level: What was your response by discovering all these photographs circulating on the web, impressed by the type of Miyazaki?

Léo Favier :: At first, I actually questioned if there was a partnership with the Ghibli studio. I stated to myself: “It is not possible, they agreed! ? ». And then I dug a little, and I understood that not. I was both surprised and curious. There is a real excitement around these images. We want to try, to see what it gives. So I got started too – and I must admit that it is quite fun. But very quickly, a question crossed me: “Why is that so clearly evokes the movies of the Ghibli studio, and never these of Makoto Shinkai, Satoshi Kon, and even Dragon Ball ? »»

ThatWho struck you on this specific type?

In the take a look at I did, it was the sky. There is one thing very pictorial, the clouds are luxurious. And then the colours, the shapes of the eyes, the hair … all this instantly evokes Ghibli. We really feel {that a} type has been absorbed, digested, to extract instantly recognizable visible codes.

Yet Ghibli, this nis just not solely Miyazaki.

No, after all. There can be Takahata, Goro Miyazaki, Yonebayashi, Kondo … And that is exactly what I discover attention-grabbing: these AI draw from a collective creativeness, however they don’t restore the richness of the sensitivities that coexist throughout the studio. They reproduce just one side, a simplified synthesis.

This degree of element and artisanal perfection is one thing that AI can not reproduce, as a result of it’s primarily based on a human intention, on a novel inventive imaginative and prescient.

Llarge use of the Ghibli type, particularly by theIA, is she not prone to empty him of his singularity, to erode him till he loses his energy inEnchantment?

I do not suppose. It’s a style, like PlayStation 2 filters on Tiktok: now we have enjoyable, then we transfer on. These photographs generated by AI are a floor impact, not an actual inventive strategy. The power of Ghibli’s movies is just not primarily based solely on their aesthetics. What makes them distinctive are their wealthy universes, their deep themes, their complicated characters and their intimate relationship to nature.

These are deeply humanist, ecological and poetic works, which have an effect on the very essence of our humanity. And then there’s technical know-how, which is totally exceptional. Take Princess Mononokéfor instance: that is in all probability the final massive movie nearly completely animated by hand.

Even if the pc has been used for colorization, the animation itself stays unbelievable. Movements, fights, gestures … every thing is mastered to the millimeter. This degree of element and artisanal perfection is one thing that AI can not reproduce, as a result of it’s primarily based on a human intention, on a novel inventive imaginative and prescient.

LCould IA attain such a degree in the future?

Maybe technically, sure. As Martin Scorsese stated about Marvel movies: it is like themed parks, however for him it isn’t cinema. It is just not artwork. What makes the films of the studio Ghibli singular is that they’re works of writer. Miyazaki, Takahata and their producer Suzuki have all the time defended a powerful concept: making writer cinema in animation.

Do you suppose that tomorrow, a “Ghibli film generated by IA” might seduce the general public?

Artificial intelligence, in essence, digests information mountains to spit out an anticipated end result, an usually easy synthesis, modeled on what has already been executed. An strategy that opposes that of Hayao Miyazaki. He is the apology of the sudden, the cult of novelty. The proof? He by no means gave in to the temptation of the implications. Not Totoro 2not Return from Ponyo.

Each work is a novel creation, born from its need to offer life to new characters and to inform new tales. Returning on tales already explored doesn’t curiosity him, as a result of it will lead him to boredom. As a creator, he refuses rehearsal. Design one thing new requires immense vitality, however it’s exactly this problem that makes the method so fascinating and enriching.

Read too The 7 movies of the Ghibli studio to see completely on NetflixSo for you, AI and inventive creation, are these two reverse steps?

Completely. AI reproduced. Miyazaki invents. There is an unpredictability, sensitivity, poetry that the machine can’t be simulated.

Do you see in these photographs a tribute or a looting?

Clearly a looting. These corporations use photographs with out authorization, with out dialogue with the authors. There is not any recognition or respect for copyright. It is an actual downside, each moral and authorized.

Creation rests, in line with Miyazaki, on an unshakable confidence in our skill to suppose and draw, to offer life to concepts by effort and intention. Tap three phrases in a machine and watch for a picture to come up? This has nothing to do with the act of creation.

Do you suppose the Ghibli type can resist this algorithmic standardization?

I believe sure. Because it’s primarily based on one thing else. Not only a type, not simply an aesthetic. These are deeply human works. Not manufactured objects.

CChatgpt is paradoxical to breed type DA studio DAnimation that has all the time valued an nearly artisanal know-how.

Absolutely. Chatgpt represents the full antithesis of the values ​​defended by Miyazaki and the Ghibli studio. Miyazaki himself spoke publicly in opposition to using AI within the inventive discipline, denouncing his absence of soul, sensitivity and true inventive intention.

Hayao Miyazaki has all the time expressed visceral mistrust of latest applied sciences. What would he say once they see these photographs generated by synthetic intelligence?

This jogs my memory of an animation demonstration by the IA that had been offered to him a number of years in the past. His response had been last: “I’m deeply disgusted. If you actually need to do these appalling issues, do not deprive your self. But I don’t need to combine this know-how into my work. It is an insult to life itself. “At the end of this demonstration, while continuing to draw, he added:” I’ve the sensation that we’re approaching the tip of time. We people have misplaced religion in ourselves. »»

Read too Miyazaki, our good geniusFor Miyazaki, creating is a deeply human act. It is to take cost of a pencil, and draw. It is to place the creativeness and the mind in movement, in an intimate dialogue between the spirit and the gesture. Creation is predicated, in line with him, on an unshakable confidence in our skill to suppose and draw, to offer life to concepts by effort and intention. Tap three phrases in a machine and watch for a picture to come up? This has nothing to do with the act of creation. However, everybody can draw. Not in the identical method, after all, however the essence of this act, this hyperlink between the hand and the thoughts, is common …

What do you consider the truth that public figures, like Emmanuel Macron, use the pictures impressed by Ghibli generated by Chatgpt?

I discover it fairly distressing. These instruments contain apparent copyright violations, an unlikely financial and ecological mannequin. One might hope that individuals able of energy are extra conscious of those main points.

Miyazaki offers off a type of pessimism within the face of modernity, theindustrialization, conflict and destruction of thesurroundings. Do you suppose his movies are a response to present crises?

Yes, I believe. His movies are usually not solely inventive works, but in addition deep reflections on the crises we’re going via. They remind us of the significance of preserving nature, cultivating hope and enhancing solidarity. In a world the place ecological, social and political crises worsen, Miyazaki’s works invite us to rethink our relationship to dwelling and think about extra human and lasting options. These are common themes, however approached with poetry and accessibility that make them deeply touching.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7JZ4QHTWQA

ThatWho marked you essentially the most by making a documentary on the work of Miyazaki?

What struck me above all was its distinctive skill to seize the very essence of humanity. His movies are of obvious simplicity, however of exceptional depth. They are accessible to everybody, whereas being imbued with emotional and philosophical complexity. They remind us of what’s actually important: nature, human relationships and hope.


To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

Answer



Hayao Miyazaki has a deeply private strategy in his creations. Having grown up in a Japan ravaged by the Second World War, it was marked by destruction and despair, but in addition by the resilience and the capability of humanity to stand up. Despite his pessimism on the way forward for the world, he has all the time needed to create youngsters’s movies to be able to supply them a glimmer of hope and present them that, even in adversity, there’s magnificence and causes to consider in a greater future.

His works are an enchanting combination of sunshine and shade, despair and optimism. It is that this duality, this refined distinction, which makes his movies so distinctive, so common and so timeless.



https://www.lepoint.fr/pop-culture/pour-le-cineaste-leo-favier-chatgpt-c-est-l-antithese-des-valeurs-de-ghibli-01-04-2025-2586298_2920.php