When Yves Boisset, the director of “Dupont Lajoie”, attacked Hollywood | EUROtoday

“There, I fall from my chair. I realize it’s really The price of danger. I’m going to find Alain Sussfeld, the boss of UGC and I said to him: “I went to see the Running Man, It’s precisely The worth of hazard. He replied: “Yes, yes, I know, it is we who distribute Running Man!”. I say: “Well, what are we doing?”. He stated to me: “You do what you want, we do nothing, because we have a framework agreement with Schwarzenegger. We have the next six films of Schwarzenegger, among which, indeed, Running Man ! “”.

When Yves Boisset then asks the boss of UGC if he realizes that Running Man Is “a plagiarism of the worth of hazard”, Alain Sussfeld retorts him: “Well, it’s indeniable, however we aren’t going to get indignant with Schwarzenegger on your lovely eyes. If you need to make a lawsuit, make a lawsuit, when you have the means to make a trial at Fox and Schwarzenegger, go forward! ».

Of which act: Yves Boisset drags the American studio in entrance of the TGI of Paris and, in October 1988, seven months after the French launch of Running Man (which totals round 800,000 entries to the tricolor field workplace), the courting agrees. Fox is condemned to pay him damages below the ethical and heritage injury.

But the machine will get carried away: the multinational appealed the judgment and, in July 1990, the court docket gave it purpose towards Yves Boisset. As the article of Firstthe decision stipulates that “the spirit of works, as well as evolution and outcome, are completely different” and “counterfeiting cannot result from the resumption of a general idea or an already known theme”.

Yves Boisset and the Flight crash TWA 800

One in every single place the ball within the middle? Than nenni for the reason that director of Danger worth Decides to convey the case earlier than the Court of Cassation … which, in May 1992, invalidated the judgment on attraction. The case was then referred on attraction and the process extends till May 1996, the date on which French justice definitively agreed on the substance to Yves Boisset, confirming the choice of the TGI of Paris. The legal professionals of the American studio, who misplaced the battle, can have deployed arguments to contest the quantity of the compensation to be paid to the director, notably emphasizing the complicity of UGC, which distributed Running Man In France.

To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

The complainant Boisset will nevertheless should take his ache in endurance resulting from a thoughts -blowing twist, within the type of an air tragedy. In June 1996, a letter notifying the choice of the Court of Appeal was despatched to the Americans. Their response, essential for the right completion of the file, was returned by aircraft in July 1996 … aboard the Flight TWA 800, which will likely be sprayed in the course of the flight of New York shortly after takeoff, after the unintentional explosion of its gasoline tank. Following this catastrophe, in accordance with the investigation process, the doc will stay blocked on the opposite aspect of the Atlantic. Long months will due to this fact nonetheless be flowing earlier than, in 1998, Yves Boisset acquired his allowances: “A million five hundred thousand francs” believes to recollect the filmmaker within the INA archive.

An unprofitable sum in view of the eleven years of fierce wrestle of the director, which can nevertheless declare the important: a “moral victory”. The limitless trial has lengthy earned the Danger worth and at Running Man To see their numerous “frozen” operations, on video as in tv. The first is at the moment seen on Ciné + OCS, it’s also out there on DVD/Blu-ray, similar to the second, which stays unplaceded for the second on our platforms … Pending a Hollywood remake introduced for the tip of 2025, directed by Edgar Wright.