“It is up to the government to manage this subject, not to the social partners” | EUROtoday
Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.
DShapeless spouts of the CGT and Force Ouvrière (FO), deep disagreements on the options to be offered, and a authorities backwards: the “conclave” of pensions, wished by François Bayrou to “restore” the very contested reform of Élisabeth Borne which should reach May, appears to the sting of failure.
Bertrand Martinot, economist and former social advisor to Nicolas Sarkozy, deciphers the bounds of those negotiations and the challenges of an explosive file.
The level: Why are these negotiations between social companions so chaotic?
Bertrand Martinot: It is at all times good to debate, however, on this case, they don’t have the capability to completely take care of the topic. Pensions signify 1 / 4 of our public spending. I have no idea a single nation which refers to interprofessional negotiations the destiny of 25 % of whole public spending.
Read too 30 million French folks stay public cash: a political lifeless finish? As the federal government has no majority, it has given the social companions an important topic because it inextricably mixes taxation, the final trajectory of our public funds and the query of pension plans for the general public sector that they can’t take care of … It is as much as the federal government to handle this topic general: it’s all the identical he who will negotiate in Brussels and who should persuade the monetary markets collectively. It is as in the event that they have been requested to resolve the query of medical insurance.
Can these discussions result in concrete measures?
The Medef and the CFDT wish to play the sport and present that they can compromise and arrive at an settlement. At least on some important ideas and a roadmap for the longer term for the longer term, there could also be the potential of reaching one thing.
On the opposite hand, the social companions can agree on the precept of return to steadiness with out rising the obligatory levies now that the CGT and FO, which want to improve them to fill the deficit, have come out of the sport.
What topic? Hardness, for instance?
They can outline important tips on this topic, however the very best is to refer it to department negotiations: they’re extra capable of apprehend this topic of arduousness, which is linked to the specificity of the trades. At the interprofessional degree, what will be performed greatest is the gasoline manufacturing facility of the purpose -based level account system that has not labored thus far …
On the opposite hand, the social companions can agree on the precept of return to steadiness with out rising the obligatory samples now that the CGT and FO, which want to improve them to fill the deficit, have come out of the sport. But it is going to undoubtedly be inadequate for the numerous parliamentarians who wish to return to 64 years …Read too Retirement at 60: how was born “the great French stupidity”
To uncover
The kangaroo of the day
Answer
The MEDEF needs to placed on the desk the financing of all social safety and pushes for social VAT. Is it related?
It is related in absolute phrases, however I’m not positive that the negotiation of pensions is the place to determine on the strategies of financing medical insurance or the household department, that are the 2 topics on which there can be actual margins to make such a change to VAT. And it’s unlikely that there’s an settlement with the unions on such an operation.
https://www.lepoint.fr/economie/retraites-c-est-au-gouvernement-de-gerer-ce-sujet-pas-aux-partenaires-sociaux-02-04-2025-2586390_28.php
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
French
German
Hungarian
Italian
Norwegian
Portuguese
Spanish
Swedish
Ukrainian