RBB publishes a brief model of investigation report on Causa yellow -haired | EUROtoday

The fee of the investigation, which has handled the wrong reporting of the Berlin-Brandenburg Radio (RBB) in regards to the inexperienced politician Stefan Gelbhaar, attests to critical journalistic errors and a problematic process for the editor-in-chief. This emerges from the abstract of the 96-page last report, which the RBB printed in Berlin on Thursday. According to its personal statements, the Commission has had discussions with 13 RBB staff, and evaluated emails, protocols, statements, video contributions, textual content articles, podcasts and radio contributions.

The report states that these concerned within the analysis had no expertise in investigative journalism. Despite the scope of the allegations, the editor -in -chief had solely “rudimentary” details about the analysis and the institution of the reporting.

The RBB had commissioned the advisory firm Deloitte and the previous head of the NDR investigative division, Stephan Wels, to take care of the occasions. For character and information safety causes, the report shouldn’t be totally printed, however the public is now accessible to a abstract of the outcomes.

“The author: Inside, serious journalistic mistakes have made; they have violated basic journalistic rules (…),” it says. The individuals had no earlier expertise with investigative analysis. “It is therefore not understandable that this team was entrusted with this topic,” continued the abstract. The similar applies to the supervising editor. The Justitiariat was additionally glad too rapidly with the data from the editorial staff. The editor-in-chief was additionally not sufficiently knowledgeable, though the scope of metoo instances is understood. In addition, the broadcaster in reporting solely step by step corrected and step by step corrected. Errors had been additionally made within the inside processing.

The auditor suggest that the broadcaster will solely perform this scope of this scope, together with investigative items. The editor -in -chief should guarantee a “minimum level of content, occupation and risk assessment”. To do that, it ought to be thought of to distribute the chief editor’s duties over a number of shoulders sooner or later. In addition, the broadcaster ought to provide coaching on suspicion reporting.

The RBB director Ulrike Demmer is optimistic in regards to the implementation of the suggestions: “According to the detailed report, we have now put together a package of measures with which the credibility of the reliable and independent reporting of the RBB can be restored.” The bundle stipulates that editorial rules are to be revised, together with position descriptions within the editorial workplaces. It is best to combine tips into on a regular basis life. The RBB additionally ensures obligatory coaching for suspected reporting. In addition, they wish to revise the editorial processes within the editor -in -chief.

At the top of 2024, the RBB reported on allegations towards yellow hair that he had rejected. After that, the broadcaster had granted “serious mistakes” in reporting and withdrawn a big a part of it.

As a consequence of incorrect reporting, the RBB in March introduced the obligatory involvement of investigative groups within the occasion of a corresponding analysis. Editor -in -chief David Biesinger and program director Katrin Günther laid her workplaces.

According to the abstract, the RBB has already made the primary mistake on the RBB in mid -December 2024 and thus two weeks earlier than the wrong analysis on yellow hair was launched by spreading a quote with allegations. Although this assertion was revoked shortly afterwards, the RBB continued to report on it for nearly an hour. In the additional course there have been different critical errors. In a problem of the “evening show”, the RBB had a dialog with the supposed witness “Anne K.” staged that there was no and couldn’t exist as a result of the individual didn’t exist. She turned out to be an invention. In this context, the Berlin public prosecutor’s workplace is investigating the previous inexperienced politician Shirin Kreße and towards unknown for defamation. Stefan Gelbhaar is suing the RBB for compensation of 1.7 million euros.