Notes from an interview with Mario Vargas Llosa | Culture | EUROtoday

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

“Ok Vargas Llosa said. And we should do it as soon as possible. To put it in the number of February 5, before her speech at the Academy of France,” Belinda Saile, editor Chief of EPS wrote to me, on January 12, 2023. He had been exchanging messages along with her and Borja Echevarría, deputy director of El País. I went to my research, the place I remembered to have The fish within the waterChronicles of Vargas Llosa about his life, and browse it earlier than quoting with him. To an interview with such a man, who has lived all lives and written all books and studied to all authors, you need to go alone with what’s put. And I made a decision in just a few seconds, certainly remembering Juan Cruz, who doesn’t get uninterested in recommending it, that I might go along with the recent studying of The fish within the water.

I’ve the e book now with me with a number of marked pages. In one in every of them, Vargas speaks of the assaults obtained by an outdated buddy, José Rosas-lribeyro, utilized by the leftist authorities; Rosas-lribeyro was heading to the editor of Vargas, Patricia Pinilla: “Tell Mario to ignore the things I declare against him, because they are only Coyuntural”In one other, the definitive rupture, frost, together with his father, which days later he informed me within the interview:“ The beginning was not good: I discover that he is not dead [le habían hecho creer durante su infancia que sí]. He had the idea that all writers and poets were drunk or fags: he produced real horror. ”In these pages he remembers how, after publishing Aunt Julia and the authorduring which he portrays a father who acted similar to that of his violent father, he wrote a letter to thank him for Vargas who had been very extreme with him, “I have always loved you.” Time later, whereas speaking to his mom on the cellphone, the daddy wished to place himself on the cellphone to speak about Aunt Julia and the author. Vargas hung, and days later he obtained a impolite letter: Vargas had been a resentful slanderer, and an atheist to which divine punishment was ready for him. In addition, the daddy would flow into that letter between associates and acquaintances to learn the entire world, and that did: dozens, “perhaps hundreds of copies” circulated by way of Peru.

I bear in mind, whereas studying the e book, which immediately had a chilly sweat. A month earlier, on January 4, he had written a column about Vargas Llosa and Isabel Preysler during which he laughs with a information he had given ABC: It seems that Vargas Llosa had despatched him the manuscript of his newest e book to Preysler, and he had replied that he didn’t return house, that the break was complete. I interpreted it as a literary criticism, and fantasized about Isabel Preysler’s response: “So far we have arrived, this narrative is where to take it, I lose the thread, the syntax is crazy. Do not return here, Tamara is frightened.” That wrote a month earlier than the Nobel, his work and his heartbreak. And now he would have it in entrance of an excuse, his historic admission to the French Academy, and a fragile mission that he reserved for the tip, as a result of it’s true that there have been extra attention-grabbing issues than asking him: that he pronounced on his breakup.

When I arrived at his well-known flooring of Flora Street within the middle of Madrid, an enormous duplex stuffed with vegetation and light-weight from which he had learn within the magazines that had been “refugee” – and used the verb in my entradilla – after his exit from the preysler’s mansion, he approached me smiling and stated: “You have left a beard!”. We had by no means seen one another or, in fact, he knew something about me, nor did I write my identify each week on Google to test the way it was a beard. Simply, as I confirmed later for an additional undeniable fact that I do not bear in mind, I appeared to have confused myself with somebody. I waited for him to overlook the confusion or, in the end, that confusion didn’t hinder the discuss with tales of the kind “As you know, because we were together, something similar happened in Lima.” Nothing else occurred. Perhaps, a name that interrupted his recording and remark: “Ah, I didn’t know you had a child,” that he awoke my curiosity about who could be confused. The fact is that, seen now in perspective, there have been solely two courtly feedback of Mario Vargas Llosa to a nervous interviewer.

We sat in two armchairs, subsequent to one another, and an assistant supplied us to drink. “Water,” stated the Nobel. I hesitated, however I made a decision {that a} wine would take me out of the beautiful, as a result of the person who had forward, already hunched up by age, already skinny as a result of outdated age surrounded him because the lions encompass his prey, I had written novels that had left me face down (reminiscence The goat celebration A summer time in my city: I completed it and, pale, I began once more to search out out what had occurred, how I had written that).

“I open a bottle,” stated the assistant. “Do not open it, it is not necessary, I will drink water,” I stated frightened, it was solely essential to undo the Bodega to the Nobel. And the voice of Vargas Llosa, 87 joyful years, immediately: “Look, don’t bring me the water, open the bottle and serve two wines.” We drank two reds. Then we drank two extra. I bear in mind how a lot his age impressed and the truth that he continued writing books and columns, and enduring paparazzi on the portal, so I began the interview asking him about immortality. “Being immortal would seem bored. And in the following responses, intelligent, he settled his confusion with respect to me and with respect to other historical issues (two, no more) in which he was danced clearly. “What I hate is deterioration. Human ruins. It is one thing horrible, the worst factor that would occur to me. For instance, I’ve reminiscence issues now. I had all the time very lucid reminiscence. I remembered issues, and I discover the way it has been impoverished. Some names, for instance: I see the faces, however the names have been misplaced to me.” And he clarified that he had a prodigious memory for very specific facts, very precise adventures and, nevertheless, other stages of his life were kept in a rare nebula.

Vargas Llosa had the red cheeks (he spoke a lot, he made efforts to remember and used humor and sarcasm, or acting as a sniper, according to the theme that was presented to him) when he approached the heaviest moment for both of us. “How does one of many pink press tunnel machine come?” “Not making any assertion. I’ve not achieved any about Isabel.” I tried on the other hand, his essay The civilization of the showbut he cut with laughter: “I’m not going to speak about Isabel, in any respect.” He ended up saying something: “It was an impressive, however not literary expertise,” “There are two very completely different worlds, very separate, however nicely: the expertise was lived and that is it, I’m in my home once more, surrounded by my books [rio mucho aquí, según reviso en la grabación: rio con ganas]”,” I don’t remorse something, completely. “Although the morbidity took me on the other hand, and what I wanted to know was what Vargas never commented even in his private circle: What was the punch to García Márquez?” Women “, he just responded.

It was a pleasant conversation that continued years later by other media, already without him, thanks to my relationship with Juan Aren Madame Bovary of Flaubert with which the Nobel was photographed on the last day of 2022 on social networks). Of all of them there are images in the Hello! In Machu Picchu during a Nobel visit.

Arena, with which Vargas locked himself for a week until twice in the Leyre monastery (they sang the Gregorian songs, ate eggs with black pudding at the Landa hotel before entering), keep two shocking images of that holiday trip. One, when Vargas Llosa recited, before the Peruvian giant, the Machu Picchu’s heights, by Pablo Neruda. And in the midst of silence, those verses in their voice that begin with an immortal one: “Go up with me, brother.” And another, more descriptive, of the relationship of Mario Vargas Llosa with literature, the sick obsession with the letters. In Cuzco, a gardener who was rotting approached him, “with permission”, to debate a number of elements of Conversation within the cathedral: characters, plots, influences. Wisdom, blissful, the 2 spoke for half an hour of pure literature, of their rooting with actuality, of the super step left by the books within the lives and lives within the books, which doesn’t finish with loss of life, a lot much less, and that was the success, the true and most troublesome success of the author, Juan Arena thought watching the employee and the Nobel dropping the notion of time: to commit us all.

https://elpais.com/cultura/2025-04-14/notas-de-una-entrevista-a-mario-vargas-llosa.html