Mario Vargas Llosa, a person made from literature | Culture | EUROtoday

Several of the prepositions of the Spanish language might be utilized within the lengthy existence of Mario Vargas Llosa: of at literaturefrom to literature, between to literature, towards literature. And above all, to literature and by literature. He died this Sunday, April 13, 2025 in Lima, accompanied by his personal, after having lived 89 years (he turned them final March). Álvaro, Gonzalo and Morgana, the three kids he had with Patricia Llosa, with whom he lived a wedding of a long time, introduced him in his networks: “With deep pain, we make public that our father, Mario Vargas Llosa, has died today in Lima, surrounded by his family and peace.” That household tribe – avoltous, touring, difficult, enjoyable, stable – surrounded it to the top. It is curious, however it’s above all a feat, {that a} man with a childhood just like the one he had shaped such a household.

He was born in Arequipa in 1936, however didn’t meet his father till he was ten years outdated. During all that point, they didn’t inform him that he had deserted them however was useless. But when he was that age, the person reappeared and led him to dwell with him to Lima, the place he forbade him to go to the household, write – he thoughtful that it was one thing of drunkards and shellfish ” -, and he was overwhelmed. Vargas Llosa described all that in his guide The fish within the waterin a chapter referred to as ‘That man who was my dad’, a title that explains the connection – the no relationship – that he had with that man. However, in an interview I did for the complement Babelia In 2013, he mentioned: “I have always thought that if it had not been for my father, if my father had not had so much disgust at the idea that I dedicated myself to writing, perhaps I would not have had the character to persevere in a vocation that had no social seat in Peru. No one could think of being a writer, that was inconceivable in Peru of the fifties.”

It is dangerous to make a linear studying – son opposes a father and turns into one of many best authors on the planet – however the reality is {that a} chronological overview by the work of Vargas Llos The metropolis and canine (1963) was dazzling, in 1969 the cross to the jaw of Conversation within the cathedral; That adopted the 2 large novels stuffed with sagacity, narrative sources and humor which are Pantaleon and guestsof 1973, and Aunt Julia and the authorof 1977; That was nonetheless, in 1981, the genius of THE WAR OF THE END OF THE WORLD. One blow after one other, a writing that department in the direction of theater and non -fiction, and a life that did the identical: turned from the left in the direction of liberalism, he was a candidate for president for his nation, he acted within the theater, traveled as a journalist to threat areas corresponding to Iraq and Congo.

Of all authors of increasehe was one of many solely ones – the opposite was Gabriel García Márquez – who, even when he had already achieved huge recognition along with his fictional work, didn’t abandon the commerce of telling actual tales. “I think that at least half of the books I have written owe experiences, stories ideas,” he mentioned in that interview for Babelia-. Journalism has additionally been a technique to have one foot on the road. One foot in non -literary life. I don’t like the author’s concept solely. It appears to me that you just lose the sense of actuality. Undoubtedly, literature is what I like most and I dedicate most of my time to that, however the concept of ​​a life devoted to books … that phrase of Borges, ‘many issues I’ve learn and few have lived’, no, I do not like that. “That phrase could explain many of the things that happened before, and some of which happened later.

I did not use the self -reference – I did not say “in my guide such”, or “as a result of my work” – nor did he put as an example – he liked to laugh at himself – and did not boast what he had done, nor did he talk about what he was doing unless he was asked. Even so, it derived the conversation to things that he considered more interesting, such as the book of Fulano de Tal, generally a very young writer or writer whose name, in a very likely way, would end generously mentioned in his column of this newspaper, Touchstonewhich made until 2023.

In 2010 he won the Nobel Prize. In 2013 his eldest son, Álvaro, told me: “After the Nobel gave him, I said: ‘Why aren’t we going to see the Niagara cataracts on the Canadian side?’ Humility.

It was tremendously funny and educated and cultured and fun and contradictory and hedonistic and curious but, above all, someone made of literature. There are two phrases that perhaps have all their attitude towards life, which is like saying before Scripture. In the 1990s, in an interview with the Paris ReviewHe said: “I refuse to confess the chance that my finest years have been left behind, and I might not admit it even when they confronted me with proof.” In 2010, when the Nobel received, he said: “This award won’t make me a statue. I’ve many initiatives forward.” And he had them. Maybe he was so nice as a result of he spent his life writing as if he simply began writing: with the identical enthusiasm, the identical tremor, the identical need.