Luc Le Vaillant, final Mohican of a lacking left | EUROtoday

On Apr 19, 2025

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

LE time passes, even for libertarians. Impromptu phenomenon: Daniel Cohn-Bendit has simply celebrated his eighty years. When Luke the valiant noticed the everlasting teenager on the finish of March to plant his portrait in “last” of Libertyhe took a success. “Here he is very gaillarly old man,” he wrote, mid-amuse, half -lancolic, about this “big brother” in concepts as in ethos. From the age of 66, the journalist, a claimed “social libertarian”, a follower of the provocover as a lot as an allegic to authority, needed to face the details: the hourglass does his work.

“I had never thought that I would feel old one day, and then it catches up with you,” he blows, posed on a settee from the editorial workers of the Point. The portrait painter of Release,, entered in 1990 within the progressive every day, printed on this spring a set of his chronicles within the type of “will” addressed to future generations. “And too bad if they are counterfeit,” he wrote, in his (falsely?) Style disillusioned.

A UFO in his personal newspaper

Because the sixty-something man, a bit dandy in his tweed jacket, is aware of he’s within the overhang with the time. Anticlerical in a time when respect for religions takes priority over the liberty to blaspheme. Antimilitarist in a world the place the Empires are rearior. Assumed supporter of the legalization of all medication, whereas the wind blows to the suitable. A UFO, subsequently. Even inside his personal newspaper, on the coronary heart of a media left nourished with ethical progressivism, he posted the tunes of the final of the Mohicans. Capable of denouncing, in the identical columns as Daniel Schneidermann, a “wokism” who “improvises himself censor”, or to explain himself as “pouffeur of priests, imams and rabbis” as a lot as “breeder of the new ecofeministic prostrations before Gaïa”. While claiming to be once more and at all times on the left: “I think I am the only one on the left and that all the others are on the right. The bug in the machine.

Read too Behind the myth of Edwy Plenel, the flaws of a combat journalismHe, the insolent, heir to Cavanna, Bizot or Serge July, wonders about young feathers too concerned about their “status” and aspiring above all to be “widespread within the college courtyard” of the Parisian journalistic husband. Like his criticisms against a “Puritan” left which now seems so foreign to him. “We can now not be impolite and Rabelaisien,” he said, a rebellious wick across the front, before meditating on “wokism, a Trumpism that has not succeeded”.

Not a little too easy? Is everything really to sweep away from the hand in the progressive youth he meets? “Sometimes we make bullshit with good intentions …” Audiard, when you hold us. It must be said that rounding the corners, it’s not too much your thing. The valiant Luke loves the fight, the Vannes, defends the idea of being able to portray “everybody”, even the “craples”. It is without problem that Liberty “have to be the newspaper of all of the left”, but on condition of leaving a little room for his. And can’t stand the “that’s not performed” heard at a editorial conference.

“My picture? Be liked? I do not care.

He laughs at their prudence, this decorum which bridles the feathers. He has by no means feared dirtying his shirt. “I don’t care to be popular,” he mentioned, as we slam a door. Hence, generally, this writing minimize with a hammer. Conflictuality doesn’t scare it, quite the opposite: it feeds on it. He likes texts that rub, readers who rumble, the begrows in good standing. What he fears is anonymity. Or worse: the criticisms launched within the again, within the again.

Crowned by an Albert-London prize in 1998, he claims to make enjoyable of the validation of his friends. “My image? Be loved? I don’t care, ”he says. “I self -criticize myself fairly little,” to justify all of this. However, he recognized a dead angle: a criticism sometimes too supported towards feminism, and a lack of place given to this movement in its texts. “Yes, generally I used to be too essential,” he admits, before working on a nod: “It can also be as a result of I’m libertarian. »»

Read too “Balance your pork”: the court docket of enchantment provides cause to Sandra MullerIn passing, he slipped to having enjoyable writing the portrait of Sandra Muller, founding father of #balancetonporc, than that of Eric Brion, the primary determine splashed by the motion, which then crossed a interval of melancholy. True to his rebellious temperament, he claims to “defend gender equality” whereas claiming a “total” criticism of “neo-feminism”, even when it means isolating himself. Example: this chronicle titled “Force to you, violent woman”, by which he defended the concept girls should have the ability to applicable historically male registers similar to ambition or violence.

He mentioned that, for the primary time in forty years of profession, he was refused. Not to say censorship, he accepts the choice however chooses to broadcast his textual content on his social networks. An episode which, based on him, illustrates the stiffening of a left identification inclined to freeze the sexes in waterproof roles. Even if it means surprising, he claims that “never men and women have been as close to equality” as earlier than 2017. Since then, he has noticed a return to “identity logics” assigning girls to sweetness and males with violence-a “bullshit nevertheless maximum”, he says.

Glucksmanno-Ruffinist

This criticism of latest feminism is a part of him in a bigger reflection on the present drifts of progressive fights. And leads us to a query: the place to find the comrade Le Vaillant politically? Between a sure tenderness for Ruffin and a curiosity for Glucksmann, the veteran of Liberty struggling to discover a clear embodiment of his left. He sees within the first a trajectory in the direction of the social democracy which he deems laborious, elevated by a very radical entourage. In the second, he perceives a pressure between his private convictions and his father’s Atlanticist inheritance, tough to reconcile.

Read too In Montreuil, François Ruffin advances round 2027His left, the one he liked, is now not present in Mélenchon’s positions, particularly on Islamism, which he considers “deep errors”. However, he had voted for Mélenchon in 2017. Today, he formally excludes him – besides towards Marine Le Pen, the place he acknowledges that he would block. A default, reluctantly, devoted to its line: by no means give in, besides to keep away from the worst.

To uncover

The kangaroo of the day

Answer

Behind the provocative posture and the sharp tone, could also be hiding one thing else. Is it on function to do some an excessive amount of? “I have little guilt, I read too much Nietzsche for that, I know how it works,” he mentioned. And but, in his silences, his suspended sentences, his cascade indignation, we understand one thing else: the options of a libertarian little one, sincerely upset by his personal, mainly extra disoriented than Aigri.

After the assaults of Charliehe dyed his hair. His method of resisting the passing time and the time he sees scrolling. Wouldn’t he really feel no higher there, at Pointnewspaper that’s not very suspicious of connections with this new left which he abhorred? “No, I believe right here I might be ultra-woke. The spirit of contradiction, at all times.

https://www.lepoint.fr/debats/luc-le-vaillant-dernier-mohican-d-une-gauche-disparue-19-04-2025-2587736_2.php