New York man took Elon Musk at his phrase that Teslas might drive themselves. Then he hit a tree | EUROtoday

A suburban New York man says he determined to buy a Tesla after taking its billionaire chief government at his phrase that the corporate’s autos are capable of drive themselves, however as soon as the automobile’s much-touted autopilot function was activated, it promptly bought confused and collided with a tree.

Ashutosh Shankar is now suing the electrical carmaker in an effort to carry the corporate “and its representatives, including CEO Elon Musk, accountable for years of making misleading and deceptive statements” relating to Tesla’s supposed autonomous driving skills, in response to a lawsuit filed Wednesday in Westchester County Supreme Court.

In 2022, Shankar was induced by Musk’s daring claims to purchase a brand new Tesla Model Y efficiency sedan, the criticism states. Things appeared advantageous till the next 12 months, when the automobile – for which the worldwide finance and compliance government paid hundreds further for the marketed self-driving package deal – “failed to follow the road at a fork and instead drove directly into a tree down the driveway” of a house in Bedford, New York.

The wreck triggered Shankar “serious and severe” accidents to his neck and again, legal professional Robert Greenstein advised The Independent.

“Tesla misrepresented its full self-driving technology,” Greenstein stated. “My client was led to believe their self-driving technology was more advanced than it was. They promised full self-driving capability, but they didn’t deliver that.”

Tesla officers didn’t reply to a request for remark.

open image in gallery

Shankar purchased his Model Y in 2022, spending $5,000 above the automobile’s base value to get the so-called Enhanced Autopilot model of Tesla’s superior driver help system package deal, or, ADAS, in response to his criticism. The submitting notes he pulled the set off primarily based on Tesla and Musk’s public statements in regards to the expertise’s benefits.

However, the criticism goes on, Tesla has “deceptively and misleadingly marketed its ADAS technology as autonomous driving technology under various names, including ‘Autopilot,’ ‘Enhanced Autopilot,’ and ‘Full Self-Driving Capability,’ the latter two of which Tesla charges consumers thousands of additional dollars to add to their new vehicle.”

On September 30, 2023, Shankar was a passenger in his personal automobile whereas another person drove, the criticism states. But, it contends, after the automobile was set to full self-driving mode, it crashed.

The incident was triggered “wholly and solely by reason of [Tesla’s] negligence,” the criticism contends.

“Drivers have consistently found that Tesla’s Full Self-Driving software has a lot of problems, such as cars failing to make routine turns, running red lights, and steering directly into large objects and oncoming traffic,” it continues, “There have also been numerous collisions involving Tesla’s purportedly cutting-edge ADAS software, including Tesla vehicles plowing at high speeds into large stationary objects such as emergency vehicles and an overturned box truck.”

open image in gallery

The criticism provides that “[d]ozens of people have suffered fatal and other serious injuries as a result of these ADAS-related collisions,” which have resulted in “a host of investigations by state and federal regulators.”

“Tesla knew for years that its statements regarding its ADAS technology were deceptive and misleading, but the company made them anyway,” the criticism states, claiming the carnaker did so “to generate excitement about the company’s vehicles and thereby improve its financial condition by, among other things, attracting investment, increasing sales, avoiding bankruptcy, increasing Tesla’s stock price, and helping to establish Tesla as a dominant player in the electric vehicle market.”

Further, the criticism alleges, Tesla itself “has admitted” that the time period “full self-driving” is inaccurate. In fact, it says, full self-driving Teslas are not fully self-driving, as they still require a driver to steer, brake and accelerate “as needed.”

“In the meantime, Tesla and Elon Musk continued their deceptive marketing to consumers,” the complaint states.

This, according to the complaint, occurred on Tesla’s blog and website, earnings calls, podcasts, and on Musk’s X account. It says Musk and Co. “knew… or should have known” that their statements about full self-driving were “untrue, misleading, and likely to deceive the public.”

“On information and belief, Defendant is nowhere near being able to deliver fully self-driving vehicles,” the complaint argues.

open image in gallery

Last 12 months, the household of a California man who died on the wheel of a Tesla in “full self-driving” mode additionally sued over Tesla and Musk’s claims in regards to the expertise.

The household’s legal professional, Brett Schreiber, advised The Independent“This is yet another example of Tesla using our public roadways to perform research and development of its autonomous driving technology.”

In brief, Schreiber stated, Tesla’s self-driving function is “not really ready for primetime.”

Giovanni Mendoza, the driving force who perished in that incident, “saw, heard, and/or read many of Tesla or Musk’s deceptive claims on Twitter, Tesla’s official blog, or in the news media,” his household’s December 2024 criticism stated. “Giovanni believed those claims were true, and thus believed the ‘Autopilot’ feature with the ‘full self driving’ upgrade was safer than a human driver, and could be trusted to safely navigate public highways autonomously.”

Tesla’s self-driving claims have additionally led to class-action fits within the U.S., Australia and Europe. In 2020, a German court docket ordered Tesla to stop all promoting associated to self-driving.

Shankar’s lawsuit accuses Tesla of fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, negligence and unjust enrichment. He is searching for an unspecified cash judgment, together with punitive damages, in addition to attorneys’ charges.

Tesla now has roughly three weeks to formally reply to Shankar’s claims.