New controversy within the Vatican: Cardinal Cipriani, punished after being accused of abuse, participates in acts previous to conclave | International | EUROtoday

The nation launched in 2018 an investigation of pedophilia within the Spanish Church and has a database Updated with all identified instances. If you understand any case that has not seen the sunshine, you’ll be able to write to: abusos@elpais.es. If it’s a case in Latin America, the handle is: abusosamerica@elpais.es.

───────────

The case of Cardinal Becciu – which on Tuesday, after ten days of pulse to the Holy See, resigned to enter the conclave that can select the brand new Pope -, within the Vatican, within the Vatican, one other battle is already raised on a brand new case of potential disobedience to Francisco. It is stars within the Peruvian cardinal Juan Luis Cipriani, the primary one which Opus Dei had in its historical past, which was separated and sanctioned in 2019 by Francisco after an accusation of abuse of minors.

At that point the legal principle remained secret, however was revealed by the nation final January. And among the many punishments imposed on Cipriani for the Pope was to not carry cardinal symbols. However, Cipriani, who after the publication of the article defended his innocence and criticized the Pope for punishing him “without hearing him”, has appeared nowadays in Rome wearing his cardinal habits. He visited the burning chapel of the Pontiff within the Basilica of San Pedro, additionally the tomb with the remainder of the glitter, and has participated within the basic congregations, in accordance with the pictures which have been made public in Peruvian media, such because the RPP chain.

In 2019, after receiving a letter from a sufferer, Pope Francis credible the accusations of abuse in opposition to Juan Luis Cipriani. After commissioning an investigation, he ordered the cardinal to depart the nation, depart from public life and never make statements, and prevented him from utilizing the symbols inherent within the place. In addition, he prohibited him from taking part within the conclave, however this concern is already overcome as a result of Cipriani is 81 years outdated and after the 80s that proper is misplaced. Cipriani signed and accepted the legal principle.

The query now in Rome is whether or not it’s breaking it and disobeying the pontiff, one thing that the Vatican doesn’t make clear; And, in that case, what measures are going to be taken. Cipriani, alternatively, already disobeyed the punishment when touring to Lima in January and receiving in a public act the gold medal of the town, by the mayor, Rafael López Aliaga, additionally a member of Opus Dei. And after El País article, a number of letters criticizing the Pope and denying the details. Victims of abuse within the Peruvian extremely -Catholic group of Christian life, which was not too long ago dissolved by Francisco, accuse him of getting disagree along with his complaints once they went to the archbishopric of Lima in 2011, with out acquiring any response.

This newspaper has requested Cardinal Cipriani about his scenario, via his secretary, the channel by which he has communicated with him to date, however has not obtained a solution after a wait for nearly 48 hours.

Cipriani’s pictures have already appeared on Peruvian tv. The director of the Vatican Press Room, Matteo Bruni, has needed to reply this Wednesday, for the third consecutive days, to the questions of the journalists in regards to the matter. On Tuesday he defined that it’s not clear whether or not Cipriani is disobeying or not the legal principle imposed by the Pope, as a result of the accessible info, which made public the press room itself in January after the article of this newspaper, “does not enter the details of the sanctions.” And, given the request to make clear these particulars, Bruni mentioned that in the intervening time there is no such thing as a extra info.

Bruni confirmed in his day that Cipriani was imposed “a criminal precept with some disciplinary measures regarding his public activity, the place of residence and the use of badges.” He added that the measure was nonetheless in pressure. Dead Pope Francis, in the course of the vacant headquarters, the authority to admonish or sanction Cipriani, if the case, is from the Dean of Cardinals, Giovanni Battista Re, and of the Camarlengo, Kevin Farrell, the 2 who’ve managed the Becciu case.

The Vatican Press Room has not answered the query of whether or not the Dean of the Cardinals College or the varsity itself are learning the problem, or if somebody has raised it nowadays within the discussions of the final congregations. For instance, it may do it the present archbishop of Lima, Cardinal Carlos Castillo, current in Rome and with the correct to vote within the conclave, who is aware of the issue effectively as a result of in January it was positioned on the facet of the victims and referred to as Cipriani to “abandon the vain justifications, the stubbornness and the rejection of the truth.” Bruni has responded that, if there have been information within the subsequent few days, it should talk. This Wednesday, on the every day assembly with the press, he repeated that there’s nothing extra so as to add.

In the Vatican, one of many best specialists within the pedophile scandal within the church, the Jesuit Hans Zollner, has already criticized this silence: “For me, if there are decisions against Cipriani the cardinals have to intervene,” he informed the Argentine newspaper The nation. “I do not know the sanctions, but if they exist and are disobeying them, I insist, the cardinals have to intervene, because it means that there is a problem of application of the sanctions and credibility of the sanctions.”

Asked about these phrases, Bruni has replicated Wednesday that the cardinals are conscious of the matter: “The case is known.” He recalled, then, that every one the sloping have the correct to take part within the basic congregations. “If there are no decisions, conclusions can be drawn,” he instructed, implying that if the Cardinal College has determined to not pronounce that’s already a solution.

The case and the way in which of ignoring it in the intervening time places on the desk the query of to what extent the victims of pederasty and the administration of the scandal are on the agenda of the conclave, or it’s about giving out that web page, which is the declare of part of the cardinals. During Francisco’s hold forth, regardless of his initiatives, a lot of the hierarchy and the Vatican equipment opposed resistance. They have been successful time and with the change of potatoes they hope to enter a much less combative section.

But there are extra instances of glitters concerned within the pedophilia scandal. The American cardinal Roger Mahony, Archbishop Emeritus of Los Angeles, has additionally been seen within the Vatican, accused of getting undercover 129 monks who had sexually attacked minors. And it has been seen very clearly as a result of the Holy See itself had no downside together with it among the many 9 cardinals in command of celebrating the ceremony of the closing of the Pope’s coffin. With 89 years he’ll now not vote within the conclave – one thing that was very controversial within the 2013 – however his presence has additionally been indicated by organizations that examine the abuses. On one other purple, the Frenchman Jean-Pierre Ricard, who in 2022 admitted abuses a few 14-year-old woman, there is no such thing as a information for now in Rome. In any case, he’s over 80 years outdated and wouldn’t enter the conclave.

“The inclusion of a cardinal with credible accusations in this week’s important meetings exposes the disconnection between the words and the actions of the Church in the field of abuse,” mentioned Bishops Accountability, a denunciation group of pedophilia within the church that maintains the most important database on the earth on identified instances. And he has additionally denounced Cipriani’s participation: “He mocks the Declaration of the Cardinals on the supposed importance of the subject of abuse. He guarantees to the abuse bishops the continuous support of his colleagues, while sending a worrying message to the victims of abuse. It is disturbing what Cipriani’s participation reveals on the dysfunction of the Vatican, even when he acts correctly (…) They must demonstrate that they are serious, and that means immediately prohibit the presence of Cipriani, Mahony and any other ecclesiastical leader guilty in the rest of their meetings. ”