Prince Harry’s six shock sentences on the BBC | EUROtoday

On May 3, 2025

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Lhe Prince Harry spoke in an interview with the BBC on the potential for returning to the United Kingdom, his tense household relations and his anger after the lack of his police safety outdoors the United States.

This lengthy interview intervenes shortly after his authorized defeat towards the British authorities regarding his safety – a call which, in accordance with him, exposes him to severe threats. After leaving the United Kingdom in 2020, the youngest son of Charles III and his spouse Meghan misplaced the systematic safety offered for lively members of the royal household. From now on, the Interior Ministry assesses the necessity for defense of the 40 -year -old prince on a case -by -case foundation when he goes to the nation. Harry has been dismissed from his request on enchantment, the justice contemplating that such a safety can’t be granted as a result of the prince is not an lively member of the royal household.

Here are six highlights of its upkeep.

“I cannot introduce my native country to my children. »»

Prince Harry told the BBC that any return to the United Kingdom with his wife Meghan and their children-Archie, 5, and Lilibet, 3 years old-was now “impossible”. Installed in the United States since 2020, the Duke of Sussex said he was inconceivable to him, “at this stage”, to bring his family back to the United Kingdom. “What are they going to miss?” Absolutely everything, ”he deplored. “I like my country, I always liked it, despite what some people were able to do it,” he added, visibly moved. “I miss the United Kingdom, some things there are deeply there. And it’s really sad not to be able to introduce my native country to my children, ”he deplored.

“It would be good that we find a path to reconciliation. »»

Prince Harry also claimed that in the royal family the tensions had been numerous but that the dispute which now persisted concerned its security – a subject which, according to him, has “always been the main point of friction”. “Life is too short to stay in the permanent conflict,” he said, calling for turning the page.

The Duke of Sussex also mentioned the health of his father, King Charles III, currently treated for cancer. “I don’t know how long he has left,” he said, before adding: “He doesn’t want to talk to me because of these security issues, but I would like us to be reconciled. »Returning to the publication of his memories, SpareHarry recognizes that “some family members do not [lui] will never forgive ”. “It can be good that we discover a path to reconciliation now. But, if they do not need it, it is their selection, “he concluded.

“I can only go to the United Kingdom if I am invited. »»

Prince Harry believes that the removal of his close protection in 2020 was used as a “lever” against him when he decided to withdraw from his royal functions and settle in the United States with Meghan. In this interview with the BBC, he believes that his safety could serve as a pressure instrument, preventing them from “main a distinct life”. Since his departure, the Prince has claimed to have returned to the United Kingdom only to attend funeral, appear in court or fulfill certain charities-benefiting from complete protection only during official visits. “I can solely go to the United Kingdom in full security if I’m invited … My father has loads of energy and means,” he said.

To the question of whether he was waiting for a gesture of King Charles III to restore his security, Harry replied: “I by no means requested him to intervene. I solely requested him to let the professionals do their job. According to him, this resolution to take away the safety to forestall them, Meghan and he, from leaving the royal fold. “Basically, it’s a household battle. And it’s deeply unhappy to be there once more, 5 years later, with a call which, I’m satisfied, was taken to carry us again, “he deplored.

“My status has not changed. I am who I am. »»

According to him, whether he is an active member of the royal family or not, threats to his safety remain – and have even intensified over the years. The Duke of Sussex says that his public status permanently makes him vulnerable. “My status has not changed. He cannot change. I am who I am, he sums up. I am part of a set from which I cannot escape. My situation will always remain the same. »»

Recalling his military commitment and his attachment to the United Kingdom, Harry underlines: “I gave thirty-five years of service to my country, including two missions in Afghanistan. The risks linked to my birth have always existed – they have only growed. »»

“I used to be advised that it was previous stroke of the institution. »»

Harry strongly criticized the security committee of royal relations, the Ravec (Royal and VIP Executive Committee), accusing him of an absence of transparency and independence within the administration of his file.

He mentioned he fell from the clouds by discovering {that a} consultant of the royal home sat inside the Ravec committee, which, in accordance with him, would permit the crown to affect who, inside the household, advantages from what safety. He claims that Sir Richard Mottram, then chairman of the committee, would have given up an in -depth evaluation after exchanges with the royal home.

“I was told, once the facts were known, that it was a good old coup mounted from the establishment,” mentioned the prince, summarizing a sense of deep injustice within the face of what he perceives as a political remedy disguised as an administrative resolution.

“I ask the Prime Minister to intervene. »»

Harry says he renounces his enchantment towards the British authorities to the Supreme Court, the final choice after his authorized defeat within the case linked to his safety within the United Kingdom. “This decision shows that there is no way to win by courts,” he mentioned, earlier than including: “I don’t want to extend the battles. There are already too many suffering and conflicts in the world. »»

To uncover

The kangaroo of the day

Answer

Despite this judicial renunciation, the Duke of Sussex urged the authorities to evaluation the functioning of the Ravec committee, which he accuses of performing with out actual authorized supervision. He launched a direct enchantment to the federal government: “I ask the Prime Minister to intervene. I ask Yvette Cooper, the Minister of the Interior, to look at this case very intently. »»

Following these declarations, Buckingham Palace reacted by making certain that “all these questions were examined several times and carefully by the courts, which have reached the same conclusion each time”.

https://www.lepoint.fr/monde/retour-impossible-les-six-phrases-chocs-du-prince-harry-a-la-bbc-03-05-2025-2588759_24.php