Maybrit Illner: When it involves working with the left, Dobrindt flees into clerk | EUROtoday

His election because the tenth Chancellor had been considerably bumpy. After Friedrich Merz was lacking his personal majority within the first vote on Tuesday, the black and purple factions wanted the consent of the left for a second poll from which the CDU chairman might efficiently emerge. “False start with consequences – how strong is Chancellor Merz?” Asked Maybrit Illner on Thursday, Federal Minister of the Interior Alexander Dobrindt (CSU), the group chief of the Greens, Katharina Dröge, political scientist Julia Reuschenbach and journalist Melanie Amann.

Friedrich Merz’s rejection within the first poll resulted in a “constitutional chaos”, Amann mentioned. It was a “sign of incompetence” and “lack of information” that neither the 18 deviators, which she characterised as “free radicals”, had been ready for the consequence. Katharina Dröge contradicted components. “If you vote with ‘no’ when choosing a chancellor, you know what you are doing”, she was satisfied. Those who needed to present their occasion a “significant memo”, which signifies that the coalition is now “on shaky legs”.

Alexander Dobrindt was deeply relaxed on the matter. It was even a “encouraging sign” that the black and purple alliance had succeeded find an answer proper from the beginning. “From a situation that you did not choose that you did not want to do that, which was not there so far, you have shown that you are able to work constructively, trustingly to solve a problem,” the Federal Minister of the Interior. “Explicitly” he consists of the Greens and the left, which had solely made a second poll potential.

Illner confronted the CSU politician with the CSU and CSU “incorporated” the left with the cooperation, which violated his personal incompatibility choice. But Dobrindt fled down into the tales. “If you want to achieve a two -thirds majority in the German Bundestag, you need other parties. There is the parliamentary group of the left. It is there. There is no other for us because we do not want to do any common elements with the AfD,” he mentioned. “I think it’s good that this has succeeded. It does not change the fact that we have severe political differences.”

“I will blame them for hypocrisy,” mentioned Amann. “You are looking for people in need who otherwise demonize and reject them. They rely on partners if it suits them and if they need it.” After Thorsten has not too long ago develop into open to cooperations with the left, there’s a dispute within the Union for dealing – “only not yet on the open stage”. It additionally doesn’t convey that Dobrindt declares it to be a type, in spite of everything, the coalition settlement accommodates one or the opposite mission, which requires a two -thirds majority. “They will also have to approach the left.”

For Julia Reuschenbach, the Union is neither thought by means of nor ready. The debates about migration, the debt brake, the particular fund and the chancellor election confirmed this. By consulting the left, the occasion no less than arrives “in the new reality of a very fragmented Bundestag”. Dobrindt relativized the cooperation in “procedural issues” once more, “indeed” introduced additional votes with the left if two -thirds majorities had been essential to then guarantee in a moody one: “I will not abolish capitalism in Germany with Ms. Reichinnk.”

It was a “positive development” that the Union had been sitting at a desk along with the SPD, the Greens and the left for the primary time. Merz has typically carried out a “dramatic development” for the reason that migration vote with the belief of AfD votes and his election marketing campaign. Nevertheless, after the classification of the safety of the structure “, his party” nonetheless closing “had to clarify her dealings with the AfD. There were currently two currents in the Union. “I don’t explicitly belief somebody like Jens Spahn,” she criticized, for example, with reference to his alleged fascination for Donald Trump.

Dobrindt replied. As a transatlantic, Spahn has numerous interlocutors. With the question of the AfD dealing, his contact with the Republicans has nothing to do. The CSU politician also made it clear that the constitutional protection report did not remain without consequences. It has a “new quality” that the party was classified as secured right -wing extremist. “I’ll positively not put this report in a file cupboard,” he promised. “The report will discover itself in court docket after which there will even be a call about it.”

Dominik Lippe studies recurrently for the world concerning the night political discuss reveals. The studied biologist is a graduate of the Axel Springer Freetech Academy.