“No one will be able to deny the double speech of the Muslim Brotherhood” | EUROtoday

Yes, however the doc says later that the reform of the entire firm is critical! “The believer does not seek to reform himself, but he must reform his relatives and his society. This is a way of illustrating the principle of tadaroujwhich refers to the idea of ​​progressiveness in the application of religious rules, obligations or reforms, whether individual or collective.

I note that in the minority context the document insists on the family. It must play the leading role of indoctrination and the most discreet too, which is why the brotherhood formally prohibits “its talents” the marriage with people of the book (Jews and Christians), which the Koran nevertheless allows. The underlying model here is that of the conquest of Medina by the prophet Mohammed who established a pact with the other religious minorities. Let us understand here that it is not a question of converting individuals one by one to bring them to become Muslims, but of creating a society governed by Sharia law which will include Christians and Jews, but subject to Islamic law. Of the Dhimmis, in a word.

Some will then convert “their own free will” because the status of dhimmi is painful, humiliating and expensive. All this cannot be written black on white, because then the brotherhood could be accused of conspiracy against the state or provocation or incitement to revolt or violence, which would fall under the law.

It is a question of creating a society governed by Sharia law which will include Christians and Jews, but subject to Islamic law. Dhimmis, in a word.Florence Bergeaud-Blackler

When the individual has absorbed this preparatory teaching of two or three years, he will be able to receive subsequent lessons, in particular political training to learn very concretely how to transform society and use techniques of influence, entrism and infiltration.

His literature is amazing: all the revelations of the Koran should be taken at the foot of the letter, even the most dated or the most poetic. How to format your brain to follow this dogma while participating in current French public life?

The document explains it very well, Islam is the only celestial religion, which comes directly from God, while other religions are only human manufacturing. As such, one cannot change the divine word. However, it is made to apply to everyone and solve all the problems, of all eras, if it is applied with discipline, as a law is applied: “Islam is the solution to the great evils of modern society: individualism, racism, injustice, the monitoring of power by some. Islam is, for the brothers, integralist. There cannot be any limits between politics and the religious.

The gap with the public speech held by Mr. Lasfar on his alleged date of editorial staff (“We only have Sharia law, the laws of the Republic”, in Bourget in 2016) is gigantic.

In reality, Mr. Lasfar makes no gap with this document. You have to have your ear broken with the double speech of the brothers to spot it. He did not speak of the French Republic, he has in mind the “Islamic” Republic! Isn’t Iran an Islamic Republic? He plays on words.

You are a specialist. Have you learned something by reading it?

Everything I have read in the “VIP” triptych that I described in Frery and its networks : a imaginative and prescient, an identification, a plan. The programmatic dimension of the plan which has been systematically excluded from the analyzes of most of my colleagues who work on the Muslim Brotherhood seems right here clearly. The institution of the caliphate is the supreme goal, as a result of it appeals to Allah that the land is Muslim. This achievement should be finished methodically. Each act of every Muslim should search to attain this aim, that is what’s implicitly taught among the many brothers and who distinguishes this motion from different Salafisms. The precept of gradualism adopted by the brothers explains that the brains see nothing, as a result of this transformation is completed in a really progressive means. But the senses see it. We now not stay in the identical world as 30 years in the past.

I used to be entitled to unfounded accusations of conspiracy for analyzing what this doc exhibits very clearly.Florence Bergeaud-Blackler

One may assume that intelligence was conscious of this handbook earlier than The level And expressed it to the competent authorities. Why so many procrastination in political decision-makers with regard to those fundamentalists?

Indeed, this doc might be recognized to the DGSI, however it isn’t in its energy to make its sources recognized or the analyzes it has been conducting for years. It can solely check with the president, who decides or to not make its content material public. As on your query on procrastination, I used to say {that a} choice maker doesn’t like to speak concerning the issues of which he doesn’t discover the options. Except if you’re at struggle. So there, the choice maker can mobilize his troops and distribute the weapons. Here they might be mental. Millions of French folks have understood what’s going on, however nobody involves validate their experiences. On the opposite, most media, politicians and choice -makers really feel them responsible by telling them that they’re Islamophobic or racist, and thus disarming them. They eliminate the issue. But that can’t final.

To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

You have been accused of conspiracy for denouncing the everlasting double discourse of the brothers. What to consider these accusations with this textual content in entrance of them?

Indeed, I used to be entitled to unfounded accusations of conspiracy on the a part of a few of your colleagues from Worldof Release or The cross For having analyzed what this doc exhibits very clearly. The most ironic is that these journalists interviewed teachers near the Frérists to disqualify me! As lengthy as journalists, choice -makers and even teachers are usually not educated, specifically what they’re speaking about, they may play the helpful idiots of frequency subversion. I may give my conferences nearly all over the place, besides at college; I now not have entry to college students, it worries me lots.